Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2020, 04:02 PM
fmradio516 fmradio516 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,573
Campy Q: H11 crank on non-disc bike

I know the cranks are pushed out by 2.5mm or whatever to maintain a good chain line with wider axle bikes.

Would it be not ideal to run these with normal axle width(100/135)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2020, 04:57 PM
tomato coupe tomato coupe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmradio516 View Post
I know the cranks are pushed out by 2.5mm or whatever to maintain a good chain line with wider axle bikes.

Would it be not ideal to run these with normal axle width(100/135)?
I have also read that H11 cranks are pushed out by 2.5 mm. I measured a set, however, and they were exactly the same as a 'regular' set of cranks. Go figure ...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2020, 05:21 PM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomato coupe View Post
I have also read that H11 cranks are pushed out by 2.5 mm. I measured a set, however, and they were exactly the same as a 'regular' set of cranks. Go figure ...
Yeah, something about claims for the H11 crank didn't add up. They say that it has a 2.5mm wider chainline, while keeping the same narrow 145.5mm Q factor. But there is very little clearance between front derailleur cage and the backside of the crankarm on a standard 11spd crank. There's no way they could have pushed the chainline out without the derailleur cage interfering with the crank arm.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2020, 05:32 PM
tuscanyswe tuscanyswe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,971
I dunno its kinda hard to believe campy designed a new crank for discbrakes and thus wider rear hubs to accomodate a better chainline without actually doing it.

I have not measured or tested so i will take your words for it but seems odd..

The q factor is measured to the pedals tho right so the crank arm could be arched right? To achieve same low q factor but more clearance for fd and the wider chainline perhaps and also could be slimmer arm in general as well i guess or a combo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2020, 11:56 PM
flying flying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmradio516 View Post

Would it be not ideal to run these with normal axle width(100/135)?
I have often read reviews at sites selling it & they say no problem at all with normal width
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2020, 06:25 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmradio516 View Post
I know the cranks are pushed out by 2.5mm or whatever to maintain a good chain line with wider axle bikes.

Would it be not ideal to run these with normal axle width(100/135)?
They would work fine on a 'non' disc brake, 135mm rear end.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2020, 06:49 AM
fmradio516 fmradio516 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,573
Thanks all!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.