|
|
|
|
#1
02-16-2016, 06:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
MX-L Geometry question
I have a motorola MX-L with the below geometry. Does anyone know if this is the standard century geometry? It looks like the TT is a bit short for the size of the ST.
All c-c TT - 56.5 ST - 58 HT - 15.5 
|
|
#2
02-16-2016, 06:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That seat tube measurement could be center to top and not center to center. I think for a center to top measurement, it's reasonable. And if it's center to top, is it the top of the top tube or the end of the seat tube. It can vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.
Try to find out how Merckx's are spec'd.
__________________
http://hubbardpark.blogspot.com/
|
|
#3
02-16-2016, 06:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
02-16-2016, 06:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Could this be Freuler geometry?
Does anyone have a Freuler geometry chart. It is definitely not century. Below is a century chart from GITA.
|
|
#6
02-16-2016, 06:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
02-16-2016, 07:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is definitely not Freuler geometry, since that adds additional height above the top tube for both the seat tube and the headtube. Your headtube is far too short for Freuler, in fact it is pretty short for a 58 c-c ST, so I am guessing it is a custom.
|
|
#9
02-16-2016, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is it a team bike by chance? When I was doing research on the yellow one, I found that some people report custom geometries.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
