Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2004, 09:36 PM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,541
Now I need carbon handlebar help!

Hi Folks,

As some of you undoubtedly are aware, I have purchased a Modolo Curvissima handlebar for use with my new bike. Before anyone chides me for jumping on the bandwagon, let me justify my purchase by saying that I bought them not to save weight, but rather because these bars have a unique shape. They seem to be fairly similar to the old Cinelli 65s, though that is not really the case because they had more reach.

Anyway, my new ride will arrive shortly and I must decide on a stem. I am a bit nervous here. I do not know what length I will need, other than to say that it will be at least a 13 cm, but that is not really the question here.

The reason I am posting this is that I REALLY to not want to damage the bars on the first installation. They were ridiculously expensive!!

A poster earlier said that I need to have a closed faceplate stem. But on the fine print on the bar it merely says that the handlebar and stem must not be "perforated". I take this to mean that it should not have holes cut into it for cables. Well, I ain't gonna do that. It has good grooves already.

Anyway, good advice is given that the stem needs to have rounded edges, and there may be no cuts to the carbon, etc. All good advice.

Now I want your advice. Are there any tips on how to install this thing? I do not want to crush it, but I don't want it to slip either. Is 2-bolt or 4-bolt better? The Easton stem is ugly, but it appears that the bolts do not screw right into the stem, but rather into a nut. Is this a good choice?

Any tips?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2004, 09:21 AM
lithiapark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
stem for a carbon bar

ITM Millenium works well with Easton EC90 bar. The ITM has a two bolt face plate. It is accurately made, there is full contact of the face plate with the bar, so no focal pressure points around the circumference of the bar. The ends of the face plate are curved so the edge contact is spread over a larger area. All of this will minimize the development of stress risers. Some argue that 4 bolt face plates are more rigid, and hence are more likely to have increased stress at the edges of the face plate-a little flex will allow pressure to spread over a larger area.

After I was sure I had the stem I wanted, I took some small rasps and emery cloth to the edges of the handlebar hole in the stem. I made a small radius and then polished it very smooth, in an effort to reduce stress risers.

The Easton bar has a gritty material in the epoxy at the stem contact point which seems to assist nicely with holding the bar securely, don't have to tighten the clamp much and the bar is very secure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2004, 03:00 PM
zap zap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,122
Thomson is a great choice. A little heavy, 120@200g but is a clean solid design. Wide 4 bolt handlebar clamp. Fantastic precise machining. Follow the torque directions and your carbon bars will be fine. My Thomson stem has been kinder to the Easton Carbon bar than the Deda Newton.

See post on ITM Uniko. Maybe the future for carbon bar & stems?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.