Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:17 PM
jberenyi's Avatar
jberenyi jberenyi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 846
Anti-Seize vs. Teflon Tape On A Ti Frame

Well after two years of riding my Lynskey Level 3 Custom it finally developed a cyclic creak in the bottom bracket so I removed it last night. I remember when I put it together with a Record Ultra Torque Compact crank setup I only greased the threads on the frame and cups. I was too excited to put it together so I opted for synthetic grease instead of using a copper or nickel based anti-seize compound. I understand that some have been using a Teflon tape in place of seize compound and some even use tape with grease. I have availabe, some Lock-tite Nickel based anti-seize or I can use the Teflon tape method. I fear using the Teflon tape only because the interface of the threads between frame and cups are snug enough that three wraps of Teflon may cause excessive tightness while wrenching them down. What would you guys use?
__________________
In a world of compromise, some men don't.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:22 PM
RBaker2778 RBaker2778 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 190
I have an Eriksen ti frame with record UT cups, and I have found that the Park Anti Seize compound works very well. I have used teflon on some BB's that were extra noisy, but I limited it to a single wrap on the cup threads. I have never had to use more than the anti-seize on my Eriksen, so I would give that try first.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:34 PM
false_Aest's Avatar
false_Aest false_Aest is offline
Princess Sweat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,002
I was taught 1 wrap of teflon tape and a good bit of anti-seize.

T
__________________
IG: elysianbikeco
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:47 PM
dave thompson dave thompson is offline
You still here?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spokane, Washington
Posts: 10,192
IMO it's not an either/or answer, I use both grease or anti-seize and teflon tape on a bottom bracket installation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:57 PM
rockdude rockdude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Republic Boulder
Posts: 1,571
Anti-seize has worked well with me over the years. Every once-in-a-while, I will get a little noise and I just take it a part, clean it and re-apply. I have used Teflon tape on one MTB that always creaked, it seemed to work but its easier just to apply Anti-seize.
__________________
Bouldercyclingcoach.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:16 PM
derosa_guy derosa_guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 186
I've only used tape when there was some sort of damage to either the cups or the BB threads. For example, if the BB worked its way loose and was slightly damaged. The tape helps fill the gap where the threads were damages. One any new BB anti seize is enough.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:21 PM
lemonlaug lemonlaug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 96
Just pull the teflon tape a little as you stretch one layer over the threads, you'll see how thin it gets. I usually give it a light rub with my finger, which makes the tape sort of stick in the threads and you'll see how the shape of the threads really shows through.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:38 PM
znfdl's Avatar
znfdl znfdl is offline
powered by red
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: in the wine cellar, under the stairs
Posts: 2,461
Camyp prefers that Blue Lock Tite is used and not grease or tape......

Just my $.02
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:51 PM
jberenyi's Avatar
jberenyi jberenyi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 846
Interesting how Campy makes a blanket statement on this issue. I wonder if the same applies to Ti frames. I only say this because even the blue Loc-Tite is very difficult to remove on Ti. I would hate to remove my cups later after using this stuff!
__________________
In a world of compromise, some men don't.

Last edited by jberenyi; 09-02-2012 at 10:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2009, 04:15 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,349
Anti-sieze for certain. Don't pay for park or cycling stuff - just go to the local auto supply store and get good 'ole anti-sieze (you obviously don't need the high temp type - just the copper colored kind. I like it in a chap stick like tube - makes it easy to apply and works great.)

Ti-prep, park, etc... all are the same chit you pay 1/4 the price for at your local Advance Auto or Pep Boys... if you want to you can certainly pay the premium to have park written on the container... but if you look at what the LBS is using I'll bet they bought theirs from the auto parts store. As far as tape - I use both. Campy does mention blue loctite (or green) for chain ring bolts... but I am not sure I would be willing to have my Ti frame sieze using just loctite for the BB... for me its teflon tape and copper anti-sieze. Never hurts to remove your BB every year or so - just to be sure...



Haven't had any issues with the 3 Ti frames I have owned - but did find that teflon tape cures the annoying Ti creak that otherwise seems to be common with Ti frames.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2009, 04:37 PM
rickbb rickbb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 372
Another vote for anti-seize. No issues with a couple of Ti bikes.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-06-2009, 05:38 PM
dvs cycles dvs cycles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: OC CALIFORNIA
Posts: 927
Almost 15 years and 95000 miles on my Legend Ti and my best results have come from a mix of Phil Wood grease and some anti sieze combined with plenty of torque.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:09 PM
derosa_guy derosa_guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by znfdl
Camyp prefers that Blue Lock Tite is used and not grease or tape......

Just my $.02
For what it's worth Loctite 222 is purple, not blue. The blue stuff is 242 and has a stronger bond.

With that said I used the 222 per Campys instructions on a steel bike I built earlier in the year. When I went to swap the crank and BB I had a heck of a time getting the BB out. No way would I use it on an Aluminium frame. On my Moots I used anti-seize, 1000 miles in no issues with it coming loose or creeking. I do use it on the crank bolt however.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:16 PM
C5 Snowboarder's Avatar
C5 Snowboarder C5 Snowboarder is offline
AKA C5 Golfer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 488
LOCTITE 2432 -- I think it mentions it is for titanium type sensitive metals.
__________________
Sex at 90 is like trying to shoot pool with a rope! - G Burns
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:44 PM
frannek frannek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,018
Loctite 243 is the oil resitant version of 242. I personally would not use that based on my experiences. Like derosa_guy mentioned, the times I have used 222 per Campy's instructions have resulted in quite a bit of torque to remove the cups later. I prefer anti-seize and teflon tape as a back up only. I also use DuPont Krytox teflon grease as well, but it is ultra expensive.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.