Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:33 AM
andy mac andy mac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Where ever I lay my Giro, that's my home
Posts: 905
OT: High Def camcorders

help.

overwhelmed...!!!

any tips on what to look for, recommendations for an HD camcorder? (i'm assuming HD beats the older technology.)

price wise - less is good.

any advice much appreciated.



andy
__________________
Olympic hopefull 2008/2112/2116/2020/2024
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:49 AM
jhcakilmer's Avatar
jhcakilmer jhcakilmer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 973
Yes, the Hi def is absolutely higher quality, I've been lusting for some time now.....just can't afford one on a students budget.

How much do you want to spend?
__________________
______________

"Common sense is not so common!"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-13-2009, 06:53 AM
andy mac andy mac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Where ever I lay my Giro, that's my home
Posts: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhcakilmer
Yes, the Hi def is absolutely higher quality, I've been lusting for some time now.....just can't afford one on a students budget.

How much do you want to spend?
Seems like there are a lot between $500 and $1000 at Amazon for instance.

http://www.amazon.com/s/qid=12369464...ort=reviewrank

Cheers,

Andy
__________________
Olympic hopefull 2008/2112/2116/2020/2024
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2009, 09:22 AM
jbrainin jbrainin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Any of the affordable HD camcorders use massive compression in order to fit the much greater amount of data per video frame onto a mini-dv tape. (1920 x 1280 uses more than 7x the memory than 720 x 480--standard def--does.) The HD video world is still rather young and in a state of constant, and frequent, upheaval. There have recently been some significant new technologies to hit the market (Panasonic's new AVCHD technology) that should make their way down to lower priced consumer models within a couple of years.

For now, I'd save my money and get a cheap, decent SD mini-DV camcorder from any of the major makers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2009, 09:39 AM
slowgoing slowgoing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,021
generally, you're gonna need a fast computer and a separate video editing software package (not included with many camcorders) and HUGE AMOUNTS of disk space (I had to buy an external hard drive because the editing process took up all of my remaining internal hard drive space) and time to edit and burn DVDs. Plus you may need a blu-ray disk player in order to play the high def DVDs. Much harder and more time consuming to burn videos to DVDs than it used to be on the DVR I have hooked up to my TV.

Last edited by slowgoing; 03-13-2009 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-13-2009, 09:49 AM
Lifelover's Avatar
Lifelover Lifelover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 3,540
Before going the HD route really research what it requires from a comuter stand point.

A friend with a decent computer and a HD camera is claiming it takes him 2 hrs + of computer time to to translate every hour of video. As mentioned before, the storage requried is crazy.

He is considering getting one of the top of the line Mac Pro's and is still predicting problems.

I think the camera tech is out pacing computer tech.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2009, 09:56 AM
Jawn P Jawn P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 429
If you want to stick with a SD camera, I've got a nice 3chip I'm selling for not much

That being said, the points many people have been bringing up are valid. Unless you're shooting to P2 or Sony XDCam, there is going to be a level of compression. While it may be a big deal to some, I feel that you get a reasonable image quality and do not have to deal with the constraints (namely file size and render times) of an uncompressed format.

If you're looking for a consumer camera, the Canon HV20 is nice and relatively inexpensive.

On the prosumer level, my experiences with a Panasonic HVX200 and Sony EX1 have both been positive. If you're so interested I can expand into that a bit more.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:03 AM
jbrainin jbrainin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifelover
Before going the HD route really research what it requires from a comuter stand point.

A friend with a decent computer and a HD camera is claiming it takes him 2 hrs + of computer time to to translate every hour of video. As mentioned before, the storage requried is crazy.

He is considering getting one of the top of the line Mac Pro's and is still predicting problems.

I think the camera tech is out pacing computer tech.
I've recently acquired a Panasonic HMC-150 ACVHD cam. It is the little brother to their P2 cameras. Like them, it shoots to solid state media--in this instance, SDHC cards. The SDHC cards can easily be had for ~$50 for a 16gb card that will store 90 minutes of the highest quality video. It takes almost no time to transfer the files from the SDHC card to the hard drive on my MacBookPro and Final Cut recognizes them immediately. Problem is the going rate on this camera is about $3700.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:29 AM
Jawn P Jawn P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 429
Oh, also OP do you plan on editing on a PC or a Mac?

If it's the latter and you have any questions, let me know. Apple Product Professional at your service
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:28 AM
Lifelover's Avatar
Lifelover Lifelover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 3,540
Op Ot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawn P
Oh, also OP do you plan on editing on a PC or a Mac?

If it's the latter and you have any questions, let me know. Apple Product Professional at your service

Why is it such a struggle to get Verizon mail to work in Mac mail with the newest OS?

I was setting up my parents new Imac with thier new Verizon DSL and it took me forever to get MAC mail to work with outgoing server. My friend that I talked about above still has not got his primary email account to work on his new macBook. I tested it on my OLD imac (half basketball kind) and got the accounts to work on the first go around.

I got it to work on the new one after hours of struggle and don't know what I did to make it work. There is a fair amount of talk of the problem online but no one seems to be able to nail it down.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:14 PM
andy mac andy mac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Where ever I lay my Giro, that's my home
Posts: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawn P
Oh, also OP do you plan on editing on a PC or a Mac?

If it's the latter and you have any questions, let me know. Apple Product Professional at your service

Mac all the way baby!!!

__________________
Olympic hopefull 2008/2112/2116/2020/2024
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.