Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:19 PM
jckid's Avatar
jckid jckid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 218
Check out my Moots & reassure me!

Here's my long awaited Moots Rigormootis! UPS finally found it! They managed to lose the fork after that, but as you see, it finally arrived too. I am amazed by the quality of the frame. The tubes are larger diameter than I expected--larger than most other ti frames I've seen--and I like it. Looks good to have oversized tubing on a mountain bike.

Anyway, here's where the needing reassurance part comes in. I carefully studied the geometry of the frame on the Moots website before I bought it. Normally I would ride a 15" mountain frame. Moots makes this frame in 14" and 16". I was afraid the 14" might be a tad small. I decided the 16" frame with curved top tube would work best, because the top tube length was correct and the standover was right. Also, it listed the seat tube as 15" center to top (even though it's a 16" frame), so it seemed perfect.

When the frame arrived, it looked a little bigger than I expected. I took all the measurements, and everything matched up to the Moots geometry chart except for one thing--the seat tube measurement. Turns out it's actually 15" center to center, not center to top. The center to top measurement is 16". So the seat tube is 1" longer than I expected. That means that I will have 1" less seatpost showing than I planned on.

I set up the frame on blocks last night (not the picture below) to get an idea of the true standover. If my measurements were right, I should have about 2.5" of clearance at the midpoint. The picture below shows the seatpost at the position it will be at (give or take a 1/2cm). So here's where I need reassurance. Does this setup look aesthetically good (i.e. enough seatpost showing)? I attached pictures from two different angles. Thanks in advance for checking out my post.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Moots1.jpg (131.6 KB, 492 views)
File Type: jpg Moots2.jpg (102.8 KB, 488 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:22 PM
justinf's Avatar
justinf justinf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,458
looks sweet to me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:37 PM
gasman's Avatar
gasman gasman is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: eugene,oregon
Posts: 7,198
Build it. Ride the s#it out of it.

Sweet
__________________
Life is short-enjoy every day.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:39 PM
Steve Hampsten's Avatar
Steve Hampsten Steve Hampsten is offline
modulated
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,060
It looks awesome and you should be smacked for scaring yourself so easily. Really, I think you picked the right size and the look will be perfect. But this is a roady forum, so what do we know?

Sweet rig.

Write back and let us know how it rides.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:45 PM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 4,269
Looks good to me.

Very nice frame. I have always lusted after a Moots. Still don't have one though. Anyway, I think the amount of post is just right. On so many mtb's today it looks as if there is too much post sticking out. So much that they would seem more likely to bend/break. Build that baby and forget about it. Matt.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:46 PM
DfCas DfCas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,626
Perfect

Perfect
__________________
No signature
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2007, 09:56 PM
Louis Louis is offline
Boeuf Chaîne
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 25,462
I bet after you build it up and ride it you'll have completely forgotten about this issue.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2007, 10:07 PM
ti_boi's Avatar
ti_boi ti_boi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In My Mind
Posts: 2,347
...aesthetically....the MOOTS logo and those delicious tubes are sublime....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2007, 10:21 PM
swoop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
nice bike. you're a lovely man and you have nice teeth.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-27-2007, 10:28 PM
Lifelover's Avatar
Lifelover Lifelover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 3,540
How much stem will you end up with?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-27-2007, 10:51 PM
Ginger's Avatar
Ginger Ginger is offline
Is this roundtrip?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,112
Looks like you're in the ball park depending on the stem...standover sounds fine. If you're worried about that - pad the top tube 'cause standover on a mtb really only matters when you get off the bike in an unexpected manner.

Only way to tell is to ride it.

It may ride "bigger" than bikes you've ridden before, but you get used to things like that.

congratulations. I really like moots mtbs.

nice bike!
__________________
Box? What box? There's a box?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:08 PM
jckid's Avatar
jckid jckid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifelover
How much stem will you end up with?
I planned on a 10CM stem based on the frame's geometry chart, and the actual top tube length is the same as stated in the chart. I am probably going to use a cheap stem to start, that way if I'm wrong, I won't be out too much money. I doubt I will need any longer than 10CM, and definitely no shorter than 9CM. I know a lot of forumites here like longer stems on their road bikes, but a couple of builders recommended that for a mountain bike I should go with a little longer top tube and shorter stem. I hope that was good advice.

When I decided on the frame size, I also thought that one advantage might be that I won't have to use so many spacers to get the bars at the right level. Obviously I won't know exactly how this is going to work until I get it built and ride it, but I'm feeling better since everyone so far thinks that it looks normal with the seatpost in position. Parts will start trickeling in next week, and I am getting anxious to get this built. I am anxious to decide on a wheelset, because if I can some wheels under it, I will have a much better idea of the exact standover.

Thanks for all the comments thus far. I know most of you guys are more into road bikes. I could have posted this on a mountain bike forum, but I trust the opinions of Serotta forumites more. You guys are great!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:19 PM
Lifelover's Avatar
Lifelover Lifelover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 3,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by jckid
I planned on a 10CM stem based on the frame's geometry chart, and the actual top tube length is the same as stated in the chart. I am probably going to use a cheap stem to start, that way if I'm wrong, I won't be out too much money. I doubt I will need any longer than 10CM, and definitely no shorter than 9CM. I know a lot of forumites here like longer stems on their road bikes, but a couple of builders recommended that for a mountain bike I should go with a little longer top tube and shorter stem. I hope that was good advice.

When I decided on the frame size, I also thought that one advantage might be that I won't have to use so many spacers to get the bars at the right level. Obviously I won't know exactly how this is going to work until I get it built and ride it, but I'm feeling better since everyone so far thinks that it looks normal with the seatpost in position. Parts will start trickeling in next week, and I am getting anxious to get this built. I am anxious to decide on a wheelset, because if I can some wheels under it, I will have a much better idea of the exact standover.

Thanks for all the comments thus far. I know most of you guys are more into road bikes. I could have posted this on a mountain bike forum, but I trust the opinions of Serotta forumites more. You guys are great!
If the change doesn't impact how it rides than forget about it. It's a freaking Moots. It will look great no matter what you do.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:25 PM
Ginger's Avatar
Ginger Ginger is offline
Is this roundtrip?
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,112
If it's within specs, 9 or 10 should be fine.

If you find yourself shorter than 9 that's when you'll probably start seeing some screwy handling issues crop up.

Good luck!
__________________
Box? What box? There's a box?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:19 AM
ti_boi's Avatar
ti_boi ti_boi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In My Mind
Posts: 2,347
I don't want to speak out of turn but I have noticed a range of taste on this forum which tells me that amost everyone on this board loves bikes of all kinds.

We respect companies who build innovative and traditional bikes, like the Moots....

I can tell you that I built my MTB up about two years ago and only recently rode the thing like it was designed to be ridden. It was an epiphany! Totally enjoyable and challenging. I hope to do it again soon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.