Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2017, 08:20 PM
Tommasini53 Tommasini53 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Posts: 418
Garmin 520 vs 820

Question for experienced Garmin users:. 520 vs 820

Is it worth the extra $ for the 820? It appears the difference is a touch screen and interactive mapping as opposed to a present route. Any other features.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2017, 08:23 PM
rnhood rnhood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ormond Beach
Posts: 4,118
It's generally never worth paying more than what you need, or will need in the future. So first determine your needs and then you'll have your answer. Having said that, sometimes extra features only cost a little. Still, I recommend only buying what you need. And mapping might be the best determinant.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-25-2017, 11:58 PM
bitpuddle bitpuddle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 251
If you want navigation (and really want a Garmin), yes. Otherwise, probably no.

But Garmin software is quite bad. Take a look at Wahoo’s Bolt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2017, 05:22 AM
simonov simonov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 711
820 if realtime GPS mapping is something you want. Otherwise the 520 is the way to go between those two. Buttons are better than touch screens IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-26-2017, 05:53 AM
quickfeet quickfeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,307
The touch screen buttons are not always perfect on the 820, but I personally was annoyed all the time with the 520 not being touch screen since the 510 did have them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-26-2017, 07:03 AM
Jere Jere is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Pencil Tuckey south
Posts: 71
Hi

I have both and in the cold or wet weather the 520 is on the bike.
The buttons are better to me (Gloves and rain drops doesn’t like touch screen’s)
Summer or traveling the 820 is great.
I,m a Garmin / Apple fan so what do I know.
Jere B
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-26-2017, 09:24 AM
Gummee Gummee is offline
Old, Fat & Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NoVA for now
Posts: 5,448
One other difference that I didn't know about was Trek's Ion light that connect to your computer won't be controllable with a 520, Evidently, they only designed them to work with the touch screen computers.

I have had a 500, then a 510, and now a 520. Of the 3, I like the 520 best. Picks up satellites VERY fast. The buttons work better than a touch screen. Picks up both power meters, all 3 HR straps, and anything else you can think of without having to program what bike they belong to.

Unlike some, I've never had problems with the software.

So... if you don't need mapping, get the 520

M
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2018, 09:00 PM
jgarrett jgarrett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 71
i just ordered a wahoo element to replace my 520. I have heard from several people that the 820 touch screen is not reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2018, 12:39 AM
sooshi sooshi is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 388
I'd go with the 520 because I'd much prefer the buttons. I have the 820 and not terribly impressed with the touch screen.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.