#46
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
No, it would mean the used cassette wore the chain faster though ...
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
__________________
This foot tastes terrible! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
thats the same thing i said right?
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
This foot tastes terrible! |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
(for both 11-zz and 12-zz cassettes, whereas previous years brochures show both "F" and "R" spacers for 11-speed cassettes), incorrect then? Edit: and here is the page from the Campagnolo 2013 11-speed cassette brochure, showing both "F" (2.2mm) and "R" (2.3mm) spacers. Last edited by Dino Suegiù; 02-21-2020 at 07:28 PM. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Guess i need to take off the cassette and check all the spacers!
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
The 'G' spacer has little 'feet' that are installed 'into' the cogset spider..These can break, I have them, BTW-
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Dino Suegiù;2661566]So is this Campagnolo 2017 11-speed cassette brochure, showing only "F" (2.2mm) spacers
(for both 11-zz and 12-zz cassettes, whereas previous years brochures show both "F" and "R" spacers for 11-speed cassettes), incorrect then? OK, a correction..2017 Centaur from 2017 uses all 'F' spacers..all the others use "F" and "G".. so Quote:
The OPs cogset is SR...
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo Last edited by oldpotatoe; 02-22-2020 at 06:45 AM. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Will take it apart today. hoping im wrong. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
The R/SR cassettes do have more material machined from the m'blocs.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
So I swapped a friend's cassette on the bike and it works fine.
Upon taking the cassette apart, I noticed something about the spacers. They are labeled 2.2 but also numbered 1-4. I broke one of the spacers (#3) and sometime from the forum was nice enough to send me one. The one they sent was a #2. So I have 1,2,2,4. Does this matter? I assume they are all the same but why would they number them? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Worst case: the difference between a 2.2 and a 2.3 mm spacer is the width of a hair.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The single digit numbers with no decimal following (ie just 1, 2, 4) are of no import at all to the end user; they only identify (for Campagnolo qc apparently) the mold number of a multi-impression mold machine. You can disregard those numbers. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|