#91
|
||||
|
||||
Hang in there, OP. If you’re not feeling it, take a break as your bike can wait and it’s important to place family first. FWIW, I’ve been injured more on the trail than on the road...go figure.
__________________
what’s so funny about peace, love and understanding? |
#92
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think the only safety that comes with a group is that a group is a lot easier to see for cars coming up from behind. But that's about all I can think of. |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not suggesting that riding with random strangers is safer than going solo, I'm talking about the group of guys I have been riding with for over a decade. Big difference IMO.
|
#94
|
||||
|
||||
Agreed that is a big difference. And I think you mentioned before too a good point and that is in the event of a crash there are people who can immediately help.
|
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Been riding with one other buddy lately, on very specific roads. Also doing the big weekend rides on gravel. All good here. Enjoy the week, all! |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
I think generally riding in a group is more dangerous than riding solo. The group I normally ride with has been riding together over 10 years. All experienced alert riders. Close to same ability. Recently there was a crash, one of them ran into other, and several went down. Broken ribs, clavicle, etc.
Someone made a mistake. Wasn't looking up when he needed to. Just happened. Kinda like a NASCAR crash. I think stuff more likely to happen in a group. |
#97
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Colnagi Seven Sampson Hot Tubes LiteSpeed SpeshFatboy |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On the other note, I don't think there was anything particularly untoward in the responses. No name calling or transgressing boundaries. That's what makes a response uncivil. One of the most egregious offenders has (perhaps) been escorted off the site. And that's a good thing. Here's another interesting thread on the subject of cycling risks and parenthood. Some of the responses were very illuminating. In all kinds of ways. https://forums.thepaceline.net/showt...t+mouth&page=2 Last edited by XXtwindad; 07-09-2020 at 11:36 AM. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There are two types of group rides really and they are vastly different: - Organized ride set up by a team/club/shop that is publicly advertised, gets a pretty big draw, and has a constantly rotating cast of characters - Totally private "group" ride organized by long term friends or team members. The first is super dangerous IMO, the 2nd type I am totally fine with saying could be safer/same/only a teeny bit more dangerous than riding solo. The people I know the best and have rode with for years/decades who have 20+ years of experience and ride thousands of miles each year, racing experience, tons of pack/paceline experience, etc.. I feel very safe riding with those people. But anything organized with a rotating cast no way... we have one shop here that are absolute safety Nazis, or at least try to be, and their rides can still be really dangerous. Some places don't try at all. The club I was in years ago had to work incredibly hard to rein in behavior on our advertised weekly ride that was open to other clubs to keep behavior safe. The rides that were only open to team members were 100x safer, though I still remember a crash on one of those. The slow club/shop rides can be dangerous because there are totally new riders on them.. the pace can be super slow and it can still be dangerous. Riders don't know the rules/laws of the road, don't know pack etiquette, are still wobbly. The fast rides are dangerous because someone is going to start pretending it's a race inevitably, and you can have random riders who are fast enough to be on the ride but are too new, too stupid, etc.. to know how to behave. Last edited by benb; 07-09-2020 at 11:43 AM. |
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I know what you're saying about needing to ride. I get it. I need to do something, and for most of my life it's been riding. Makes me an all around better person! But there was also a point in my life when I was into racquetball in a big way, so I guess my mind wanders to other possible past times. But yeah....being intentional about gravel, trails, riding with friends on lesser-traveled roads probably further lessens the overall risk. |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
In fact, the table confirms this - women are twice as safe as men. They must be much more cautious while riding a bicycle. Interesting, I don't believe this applies to motor vehicles where they are about equally safe. IIRC, men have more fatalities, but drive more miles by about the same fraction. On the other hand, the Chicago study should only be taken as one data point. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Veggie did you ride today?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#104
|
||||
|
||||
I see no reason to be overly concerned about riding/safety, at least not in first-world countries where most traffic participants obey rules. Yes cycling has a slightly higher risk but its still not hazardous, far from it.
If one feels uncomfortable on the road, there are ways to avoid them- one can still do gravel or MTB.
__________________
Jeremy Clarksons bike-riding cousin |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
All these posts reinforce what I’ve been puzzled about for years.
Why are cycling clothing manufacturers researching ways to make clothing more protective??? Other than advancements in helmets and reflectivity in clothing, NOTHING (that I can tell) has been done to advance the protective qualities of the fabric. Nothing in terms of lightweight, breathable fabric designed with abrasion protection. Nothing in terms of technically advanced, strategically placed crash padding. I believe there is a mentality in pro cycling that crashing is not only part of the Job, but almost a badge of honor, part of the mystic of suffering. I believe this de-emphasizes any incentives for the industry to look into more protective clothing. This directly impacts the end users. This will remain so until enough cyclists demand better, more protective gear. But that’s not going to happen because 99.9% of cyclists have never given this a second thought. Including, I bet, 99.9% here. Yes, technically advanced materials designed to resist abrasion will not keep a rider from being hit by a car, but might very well greatly reduce the extent of injuries. |
|
|