Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2018, 09:09 PM
thoreau thoreau is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 70
Best lightweight crank/chainset?

Hello, once again soliciting some ideas from the great minds at PL. Have found myself with a hand me down frameset from one of my riding buddies. Looking for recommendations for a lightweight crankset for a project climbing bike.

So far i have looked at FSA SL-K Light and SRAM Etap. Wondering if there are others that would be more cost effective without a significant weight penalty?

Looking at something 170 50/34 or 52/36.

Thank you kindly.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2018, 10:28 PM
bikinchris bikinchris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,330
Dollar for dollar, you have good choices listed.
__________________
Forgive me for posting dumb stuff.
Chris
Little Rock, AR
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2018, 04:38 AM
R3awak3n's Avatar
R3awak3n R3awak3n is offline
aka RAEKWON
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC // Catskills, NY
Posts: 14,688
The new praxis zayante carbon seems awesome

If your frame is bb30 you cannot go wrong witha hollowgram (not cheap new but there has been some crazy good deals here on PL lately)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2018, 06:34 AM
kramnnim kramnnim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Woodleaf, NC
Posts: 6,945
Hollowgram or SWorks if BB30/PF30
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2018, 07:26 AM
Bob Ross's Avatar
Bob Ross Bob Ross is offline
Registered (ab)User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by kramnnim View Post
Hollowgram
Came in to post ^^^this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2018, 12:47 PM
yinzerniner yinzerniner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,202
Can't go wrong with SRAM ETAP / Exogram

Although crankset performance is very dependent on the bottom bracket design. The Dura Ace cranksets are awesome, but they're not best suited for narrow applications.

Cannondale Hollowgram is pretty awesome, but the tools and setup is pretty complicated. Very proprietary.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2018, 01:08 PM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,020
If I can hijack this thread -

I'm also consider a lightweight hill climb bike. This bike would be targeted for hill climb races, so lightweight is more important than ride quality, or even durability. I'm considering starting with a Trek Emonda SLR frame, which is very light (640 grams for a size 56cm). But it comes with Trek's proprietary BB90 bottom bracket, which uses 37mm OD bearings press fit directly into the BB shell. Many lightweight cranks use 30mm spindles, which just won't fit into the bearings this small, so crank choices are limited to cranks which use smaller spindles (such as Shimano's Hollowtech 24mm spindles, SRAM's GXP 24mm/22mm spindles, or Campagnolo's Ultra-Torque 25mm spindles).

So my question is: What are the lightest sub-compact cranks that will fit into a BB90 bottom bracket?

(I know that this is asking too much, but my ideal crank for this project would be a single or double chainring crank that could take a chainring as small as 22 teeth, and would have a narrow Q-factor of no greater than 150mm, and would weigh something in the region of 500 grams. This probably doesn't exist, however.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2018, 08:49 PM
madsciencenow's Avatar
madsciencenow madsciencenow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N. Chicago area.
Posts: 4,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
If I can hijack this thread -



I'm also consider a lightweight hill climb bike. This bike would be targeted for hill climb races, so lightweight is more important than ride quality, or even durability. I'm considering starting with a Trek Emonda SLR frame, which is very light (640 grams for a size 56cm). But it comes with Trek's proprietary BB90 bottom bracket, which uses 37mm OD bearings press fit directly into the BB shell. Many lightweight cranks use 30mm spindles, which just won't fit into the bearings this small, so crank choices are limited to cranks which use smaller spindles (such as Shimano's Hollowtech 24mm spindles, SRAM's GXP 24mm/22mm spindles, or Campagnolo's Ultra-Torque 25mm spindles).



So my question is: What are the lightest sub-compact cranks that will fit into a BB90 bottom bracket?



(I know that this is asking too much, but my ideal crank for this project would be a single or double chainring crank that could take a chainring as small as 22 teeth, and would have a narrow Q-factor of no greater than 150mm, and would weigh something in the region of 500 grams. This probably doesn't exist, however.)


Just get a supersix evo for not much more weight and you can run the sisl2 crankset which is pretty awesome.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kirk JKS & MRB, Alliance G-road, & Top Fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-08-2018, 09:08 PM
kramnnim kramnnim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Woodleaf, NC
Posts: 6,945
Friend had a sub 700g Emonda SLR and it cracked. The replacement they sent was ~100g heavier iirc...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2018, 12:43 PM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsciencenow View Post
Just get a supersix evo for not much more weight and you can run the sisl2 crankset which is pretty awesome.
The Supersix EVO Hi-Mod looks like a viable alternative from spec. point of view. The frame+fork weight is about 1/4 lb. more than the Emonda SLR, but much of that can be made up with an ultra-light crank (the BB30 pressfit give many more options on cranks).

But it appears that the SuperSix EVO is not available as a frame only, and the least expensive complete bike is $6500 (as compared to $3000 for the Emonda SLR frameset). I've already got most of the lightweight components/wheels I'd be using, so if I got the complete bike, I'd end up selling off most of the components. That would make up some of the difference in price, but probably not most of it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-09-2018, 01:31 PM
m4rk540 m4rk540 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 772
Price to weight to durability to practicality, nothing comes close to a Red crankset.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-09-2018, 05:03 PM
Waldo's Avatar
Waldo Waldo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 94618
Posts: 1,781
I am very happy with Lightning cranks on my weight weenie Rob English.

https://www.lightningbikes.com/cranks/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2018, 07:00 PM
mdeth1313's Avatar
mdeth1313 mdeth1313 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Dutchess County, NY (southeast corner)
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waldo View Post
I am very happy with Lightning cranks on my weight weenie Rob English.

https://www.lightningbikes.com/cranks/
I was just going to mention lightning crankset. You can also switch out spiders and they have BB's for just about any "standard".
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-09-2018, 08:24 PM
Tony Tony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 2,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by m4rk540 View Post
Price to weight to durability to practicality, nothing comes close to a Red crankset.
This
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-10-2018, 01:48 PM
thoreau thoreau is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 70
Should have mentioned the frame is BBRight. I am leaning towards FSA because of price. Hologram would be great but they all seem to be exorbitantly expensive for what they are.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.