#1
|
||||
|
||||
The jury selection process is in love with me
3rd time being selected in less than 12 months; 11th time in 7 years.
WTH do I need to do to get out of this continuous cycle? Probably nothing short of committing a serious crime, and I'm not going down that road, so I'm probably screwed. Lived in this town/county for 18 years. I work with people in their 50's/60's who've lived this county their entire lives, no run-ins with the law, and would like to serve and experience the process (I know that last one doesn't factor into selection, obviously) and never been called. Would be nice if there was a process available to have someone serve in your place, if you didn't want to/couldn't serve and could find someone to stand in. I could easily find several. Also, the wife's been summoned twice this calendar year. Random selection? My a$$. Last edited by Red Tornado; 09-14-2024 at 05:27 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I have always said they should take the jury duty list directly off the unemployment list. The gov is already paying people who are unemployed, may as well make them do something...
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Excellent suggestion.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My experience has been is that once summoned and you show up, you’re off the list for I think 3 years, whether you’re selected or not. That’s in Virginia.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
According to the summons; in the county where I live (central Texas), the only previous jury service-based exemption you can claim is if you have been both summoned and served on jury during the previous 3 years prior to the date on your current summons. I vaguely recall being able to opt out on just the summons, many years ago, if you showed up when last summoned inside of 3 years. It's probably been changed to benefit the court system.
Last edited by Red Tornado; 09-14-2024 at 05:56 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah I thought it was every three years as well. That's how Jersey does it. I got selected three years to the day last time which I thought was hilarious and very annoying.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Down here is 1 year for County courts and 2 years for Federal courts.
They should pay retired people, students or people that like that stuff..... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I've found that being really old exempts you.
It works for me. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Guessing late 50's isn't quite old enough...
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
We’re all the jury summons from the same jurisdiction/courthouse? Around here, it could be the county court, county grand jury, or federal. All separate process, AFAIK. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It’s a jury of your peers for a reason. Seems to work reasonably well (or at least, less worse than other options). |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Jury service is something I have no interest in doing, for a few reasons I don't have time to go into right now. If picked however, I would serve and try to be as impartial as possible. The irritating thing is the constant, and closely-spaced summons I keep getting. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I have lived in California for 10 years and haven't been called for jury duty once.
I wouldn't mind if I were. It's important, even if it's not how I'd prefer to spend my time.
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I've served on two juries, both were interesting experiences.
the first was a murder case...an 82-yo man strangled his 79-yo landlady with her kitchen apron. apparently some sort of jealous rage over her attentions paid to another tenant. go figure... unfortunately for me, the day before the trial started I had a quasi-serious bike crash and had an acre or road rash on one side that extended from shoulder to ankle. I was bandaged up and once we were in court, was having a very difficult time sitting comfortably in the jury box. the judge became annoyed with my constant fidgeting and stopped testimony to ask me if there was a problem. I really wanted to see how things unfolded, so told His Honor that I was ok and would take care to not interrupt the proceedings. oof, the trial lasted 6 days...was pretty miserable, but the case was fascinating so worth the discomfort. the other was an embezzlement case...during voir dire, they asked us if we knew any of the parties involved. I didn't really recognize anyone and said 'no'...turns out it involved the father of one of my high school buddies and I'd actually been to their house a few times. oops. it was a pretty open/shut deal, so knowing the plaintiff didn't really matter in the long run. anyhoo, my point is that jury is something to do to be a good citizen, but getting called repeatedly is a bit of a PITA. Last edited by Seramount; 09-14-2024 at 06:46 PM. |
|
|