Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2017, 07:50 PM
cd_davis cd_davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Newburyport , MA
Posts: 525
OT - Title Insurance - Yes or No?

New 10-month-old grandson starting to crawl, so wife wants a new house less vertical in MA.
Offer on new place in the works, but I'd like opinions on buying title insurance. For every property I've bought I always wrestle with the cost of title insurance and the real need to buy it.
Love to hear your opinions....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2017, 07:55 PM
josephr's Avatar
josephr josephr is offline
coffee consumer
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: traveler
Posts: 2,655
yes....its pretty cheap, and takes care of things in case of past history which may people may not have been disclosed. Last thing you want is to pay on a house for 20 years only to learn someone sold it 20 years ago who didn't have the right to sell it. Most mortgage companies also have it as a non-negotiable requirement.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2017, 08:24 PM
93legendti 93legendti is offline
Adam/SerottaFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11,871
Yes.
__________________
Atmsao
(according to my semi anonymous opinion)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2017, 08:26 PM
abguff abguff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sonoma, CA
Posts: 29
for the low cost of the insurance and the HUGE dollar value risk I wouldn't buy a home without title insurance. It may be a one in a million chance of a problem but a problem would be devastating.

In fact I when bought out my sister's interest in a home my parents owned since 1957 I took out title insurance. You never know if some clown may have decided they have acquired a few feet of land on your side of the property line.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2017, 08:29 PM
austex austex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO USA
Posts: 368
Most mortgage companies won't fund you without it.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2017, 09:04 PM
batman1425 batman1425 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,274
^^^ This. Never been an option to go with out on any mortgage that I or my folks have had. IMO its necessary, even if your lender doesn't require it. Especially with old properties in metro areas that may have changed hands dozens of times over the years. It is surprisingly easy for title searches to miss something, again particularly so with older property where the records were still maintained on paper. I've even heard of cases of fraud where previous transfers of title were void because of missing or invalid paperwork. As the current owner, the buck stops at you for payment if an unsatisfied lean is discovered. The $1000-1500 you spend for the insurance could literally save you hundreds of K's. No brainer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2017, 09:13 PM
Anarchist Anarchist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,177
My brother in law bought a condo in Orlando (I do not control his taste!), on his second time heading down to use it he found it occupied by another group of people who had changed the locks.

It turned out they had bought through a sale by the HOA related to unpaid levies from prior owner.

My BIL had title insurance from his buy. It took two and a half years and six figures of legal fees for him to get possession of the unit he had bought. The title insurance paid - eventually - all of his costs, including rentals for when he was in Orlando and unable to occupy “his” place.

The lesson I took from this is that all of the stories you hear about Florida legal and real estate markets are true.

And also, Title Insurance should be purchased.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2017, 09:18 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarchist View Post
My brother in law bought a condo in Orlando (I do not control his taste!), on his second time heading down to use it he found it occupied by another group of people who had changed the locks.

It turned out they had bought through a sale by the HOA related to unpaid levies from prior owner.

My BIL had title insurance from his buy. It took two and a half years and six figures of legal fees for him to get possession of the unit he had bought. The title insurance paid - eventually - all of his costs, including rentals for when he was in Orlando and unable to occupy “his” place.

The lesson I took from this is that all of the stories you hear about Florida legal and real estate markets are true.
A lot of title agencies do only very limited investigation of potential title problems before issuing insurance. I have seen properties with very serious boundary and encroachment issues, that were noted on recorded survey maps, be issued title insurance because all available maps had not been pulled. Yes, if you take out a mortgage you should absolutely have title insurance, no, it does not guarantee you will not have major issues.
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2017, 09:40 PM
jghall jghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,828
As mentioned, your lender will more than likely require. By chance not, absolutely should you purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2017, 10:18 PM
54ny77 54ny77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,988
yes, without question. it would be 1) an incredibly bad decision to not do so, and 2) see #1.

if you're paying cash, you buy an owners' policy. if you have a mortgage, you don't have an option on that. it'll be a requirement. consider: if the banks require one, so should you.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-21-2017, 10:52 PM
19wisconsin64 19wisconsin64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,089
For 18 years I was a mortgage originator / loan officer based in MA, but did business in a lot of other states. Over the years I helped thousands of people, and got a lot of business from other professional's referrals such as accountants, attorneys, professional associations, and interestingly enough-a lot of title examiners.

Of the very few times I heard of clients stating their nightmare "I didn't buy the owner's policy" stories the worst by far was from a title examiner. The title examiner was pretty experienced, and felt they had researched the property they purchased, and they purchased it with all cash that was obtained from an inheritance. Well, the property they purchased was built on land that was never to be developed, and they lost the house and did not get a penny. The utter shame, dejection, and failure in that person's voice as they told me the story was pretty intense. They were forcefully evicted, the house torn down, the developer was bankrupt. To hear in person how someone lost the money a relative worked their entire life to earn due to one's foolishness........there are life lessons and then there are big life lessons.

So, In my opinion, yes, buy the owner's title insurance policy. You may have a little wiggle room with the price of it, if you do get to choose your conveyance / closing / title / escrow attorney.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-21-2017, 11:20 PM
54ny77 54ny77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,988
I might also recommend a good attorney to assist.

When we bought our place, our lawyer found an unfinished permit from about 60 years prior via physical search of local records. It should have prevented a C of O. Title co. missed it, not just for us but for the seller when they bought it years prior!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-21-2017, 11:51 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by 54ny77 View Post
I might also recommend a good attorney to assist.

When we bought our place, our lawyer found an unfinished permit from about 60 years prior via physical search of local records. It should have prevented a C of O. Title co. missed it, not just for us but for the seller when they bought it years prior!
This is a good reason to buy TI. Something missed years ago like a mechanic's lien will be defended/paid off by the TI Company. The cost per dollar of protection is pretty cheap. Do check what kind of policy you are buying. In Ca. we have CLTA and ALTA policies. One only covers items of record and the other covers encroachments and boundary issues.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-22-2017, 04:05 AM
ripvanrando ripvanrando is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,493
Buying title insurance is easy. Getting the TI company to pay is entirely different can of worms. Back RE taxes were not paid on a home I purchased and the TI would not cover.

I did not purchase TI on my current home but did buy it on previous ones.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-22-2017, 04:15 AM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,931
As someone who lives in a jurisdiction where ownership of land is conferred by actual physical possession of paper deeds, and where there is incomplete registration of land titles, I am curious about the cost of this title insurance. What kind of premium are we talking about? What would it cost to get it for a $500K house/land purchase, for instance?
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.