Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2611  
Old 01-20-2019, 10:26 PM
LJohnny's Avatar
LJohnny LJohnny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,406
I guess I am old enough to remember the Parcel Patriots of the 90s. I lived in Worcester MA at the time and the atmosphere surrounding the team at the time was 180 degrees of what’s now.
They fought to win tonight, so good on them to be on the big bowl!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Reply With Quote
  #2612  
Old 01-20-2019, 10:52 PM
Matthew Matthew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 4,269
Nope. Unitas existed. But nine Super Bowls is just ridiculous. Especially with the way the game and the athletes have changed over time. He's gone to more Super Bowls than most teams ever will in their entire existence a hundred years from now. I know, I'm a Lions fan.
Reply With Quote
  #2613  
Old 01-20-2019, 11:03 PM
72gmc 72gmc is offline
what's a little rust?
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the home of the Huskies
Posts: 5,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtakeda View Post
I’ve been watching the patriots go to the Super Bowl for nearly 1/3 of my life and I can’t help but root for them to lose—but at the same time you have to respect the greatness.

If anything it really shows me what it’s like to be a warriors fan and see how the rest of the country view them.

What Tom Brady is doing is beyond Joe Montana. It’s a truly unbelievable accomplishment—he’s the true GOAT

I guess go rams
reminder: Montana won 4 SBs for 2 coaches. He then went to a different team, different conference, different coach, and led them to the playoffs 2 years in a row. That team hadn't won in the playoffs for two decades, but joe took them to the afc title game. This after 2 years lost to injury. He played with a relatively famous/gross sac of fluid dangling from his elbow. quarterbacks were mauled back then.

Brady's success is remarkable. He's also been in a remarkably stable system in a qb centric league. It's a different game now.
Reply With Quote
  #2614  
Old 01-21-2019, 01:39 AM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew View Post
Nope. Unitas existed. But nine Super Bowls is just ridiculous. Especially with the way the game and the athletes have changed over time. He's gone to more Super Bowls than most teams ever will in their entire existence a hundred years from now. I know, I'm a Lions fan.
And plays in an era where QBs are given unprecedented protection due to the rules. No way Tommy Boy is playing today if he dealt with the kind of punishment Unitas and basically anyone else had to deal with.

So does that make Bart Start the second greatest QB ever if we're talking title game appearances?
Reply With Quote
  #2615  
Old 01-21-2019, 05:39 AM
Bruce K's Avatar
Bruce K Bruce K is offline
Peter Pan Oath adherent
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,176
Not just SB appearances.

Overall performance - yards, touchdowns, winning percentage, playoff performances.

Agreed it’s a different era but you have to agree that players are bigger, faster, stronger now

I wonder how some of the older players would fare in today’s league.... probably not as well as they did back then

So we can only compare each in their time and no one has done it better than TB12

BK
__________________
HED Wheel afficianado

Age is a case of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it don't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #2616  
Old 01-21-2019, 05:43 AM
superbowlpats's Avatar
superbowlpats superbowlpats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 1,060
Great game to watch. With the way the Pats have played on the road this year I gave them no chance in Arrowhead. But the Pats had a game plan and executed it. Looked like Andy Reid simply took out his game plan that he uses each week and hoped Mahomes would bail him out. The athleticism that kid has is off the charts.
Reply With Quote
  #2617  
Old 01-21-2019, 05:48 AM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,958
The refs didn't exactly cover themselves in glory yesterday. Especially giving the Rams the win with that no-call. But the blow to the head call against KC was pretty egregious too.

I was definitely pulling for KC, I feel like the SB is going to be a reprise of the Pats vs. the Chargers.
Reply With Quote
  #2618  
Old 01-21-2019, 07:23 AM
dancinkozmo's Avatar
dancinkozmo dancinkozmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
So we're all just assuming Johnny Unitas never existed?
johnny unitas ...theres a haircut you could set your watch by...

Reply With Quote
  #2619  
Old 01-21-2019, 07:33 AM
jamesdak jamesdak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spdntrxi View Post
GOAT no doubts... guy is amazing


- cowboy fan
Oh please, he's a freakin' chump. His success is a product of how silly the NFL has become at protecting the QB. Go watch the 70's and watch how those QB's got the crap beat out of them and still produced. My man, Terry Bradshaw, comes to mind. We've all seen how time and again when a team starts pounding on Brady he folds and goes away for that game. There is no way he would have made it back in the day when QBs could actually be hit. Brady is not even close to being the greatest and never will be.

Brady can
Reply With Quote
  #2620  
Old 01-21-2019, 07:43 AM
djg21 djg21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 5,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
The refs didn't exactly cover themselves in glory yesterday. Especially giving the Rams the win with that no-call. But the blow to the head call against KC was pretty egregious too.

I was definitely pulling for KC, I feel like the SB is going to be a reprise of the Pats vs. the Chargers.
And the Pats receivers were being mugged on almost every play. I understanding “letting them play,” but it sure looked to me like the Officials had decided that the Pats had won too often and it was KC’s turn.
Reply With Quote
  #2621  
Old 01-21-2019, 07:56 AM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,958
we tend to see what we want to see, I'm sure the pats defense was manhandling the KC receivers too. They have been allowing this all season. I suspect it is in reaction to the safety-based rules changes that have given offenses a big advantage. I think "defensive holding" now means "threw the receiver to the ground"
Attached Images
File Type: jpg letthemplay.jpg (124.8 KB, 106 views)

Last edited by unterhausen; 01-21-2019 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2622  
Old 01-21-2019, 08:42 AM
William's Avatar
William William is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Herding nomads won't
Posts: 30,044
People are funny…

“Brady is not the best, he sucks, he couldn’t play in the old league, he would get mauled, ripped apart, beat to crap and he would suck….he just couldn’t compete…”

How many times have we had threads here where people complain about hard hits, wearing helmets, increased safety, concussions and TBI, etc….. The rules changed for a reason…players have become bigger, stronger, and faster. Let the current crop of linemen and linebackers (take them back in time or today) play by the old rules and how many QB’s do you think would last without getting annihilated? Just about none of them. The old school guys were mean, but no where near the athleticism of current players. By today’s standards going to practice, partying drinking Miller lite, eating steak, and going to practice just doesn’t cut it anymore. Rules changed for a reason.

So, like them or not, in the present, within the current timeline that exists, by the stats, Brady is the GOAT. Belllacheck…Likely another GOAT. The Patriots, one of the best franchises in the NFL to date.

NFL dynasties come and go, but B&B&P has had a longer run than most. You can hate them for it, but that doesn’t change the fact that they got it done when they needed to get it done.






W.
__________________
Custom Frame Builders List
Support our vendors!
Reply With Quote
  #2623  
Old 01-21-2019, 09:01 AM
MattTuck's Avatar
MattTuck MattTuck is offline
Classics Fan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grantham, NH
Posts: 12,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesdak View Post
Oh please, he's a freakin' chump. His success is a product of how silly the NFL has become at protecting the QB. Go watch the 70's and watch how those QB's got the crap beat out of them and still produced. My man, Terry Bradshaw, comes to mind. We've all seen how time and again when a team starts pounding on Brady he folds and goes away for that game. There is no way he would have made it back in the day when QBs could actually be hit. Brady is not even close to being the greatest and never will be.

Brady can
No doubt that QBs (and frankly, other positions as well) are more protected in today's game. But, I am not sure how you use that premise to conclude that his success is the result of keeping QBs safer.

For one, he himself missed a season due to a low hit. And many QBs in the modern era have been injured and missed all or significant portions of seasons. Aaron Rogers and Dashaun Watson come to mind.

And, more to the point, every other QB (maybe with the exception of Cam Newton) is enjoying the same benefit of the rules -- and Brady is consistently among the best performers at his position. I don't see 31 other QBs making it to the conference title game every year.

I can subscribe to the notion that comparing great players across time is problematic. Hey, how would Eddy Merckx fair in the peloton today? But if you are trying to argue that he isn't atleast the greatest player of the modern era, you are looking at the world through blinders.

The only argument that I can see on the more favorable rules, is that he has been able to player longer, gain more experience, and thus be more prepared for games (so he has an edge) and accumulate more statistics along the way. Which is surely true. So you'd have to apply the same view on records set by Peyton Manning and Drew Brees through their careers. If you wanted to argue that, you could standardize the comparisons, and discount wins late in careers. Just look at the first 4 seasons when Brady was leading the Patriots. 3 super bowl wins. So, the early years were actually the most successful -- undercutting the "experience gained by longevity thanks to the more favorable rules" argument.
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones
Reply With Quote
  #2624  
Old 01-21-2019, 09:04 AM
rwsaunders's Avatar
rwsaunders rwsaunders is offline
Everything is connected
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seaburgh
Posts: 11,205
NE should send a check to the KC lineman who was called for a neutral zone infraction and the roughing the passer call on Jones? Maybe because it was Brady. Even an amateur football follower would have to agree that the refs had real influence over the outcome of yesterday’s two games. As for the blown PI call on the Rams defender, it’s hard to feel sorry for Sean Payton...the call just happened to go against his team.

Last edited by rwsaunders; 01-21-2019 at 09:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2625  
Old 01-21-2019, 09:08 AM
jamesdak jamesdak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
People are funny…

“Brady is not the best, he sucks, he couldn’t play in the old league, he would get mauled, ripped apart, beat to crap and he would suck….he just couldn’t compete…”

How many times have we had threads here where people complain about hard hits, wearing helmets, increased safety, concussions and TBI, etc….. The rules changed for a reason…players have become bigger, stronger, and faster. Let the current crop of linemen and linebackers (take them back in time or today) play by the old rules and how many QB’s do you think would last without getting annihilated? Just about none of them. The old school guys were mean, but no where near the athleticism of current players. By today’s standards going to practice, partying drinking Miller lite, eating steak, and going to practice just doesn’t cut it anymore. Rules changed for a reason.

So, like them or not, in the present, within the current timeline that exists, by the stats, Brady is the GOAT. Belllacheck…Likely another GOAT. The Patriots, one of the best franchises in the NFL to date.

NFL dynasties come and go, but B&B&P has had a longer run than most. You can hate them for it, but that doesn’t change the fact that they got it done when they needed to get it done.

W.
I see the Pats a bit like Lance Armstrong. They just manage to cheat better than everyone else and get away with it. There's just been too many questionable things by this team. Oh and I stand by my comments. Brady cannot and couldn't take the beating that many truly great GB's have. He has never exhibited that sort of mental and physical toughness. He's just been protected by the rules and has thrived in the protected environment. He's only the GOAT if that stand for Greatest Overhyped All Time.

Official Patriot hater and PROUD OF IT!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.