Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-07-2018, 05:33 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCfixie View Post
Try lower tire pressures first and ride it some more. If it still feels too stiff, than it is no matter what anybody else tells you.

I ordered a new Seven mid-reach brake road bike about 18 months ago and something got lost in translation between the store and Seven so the seat stays were too big. I tried almost everything to make it feel less stiff: changed from Shimano C35 to C24 wheels, wider tires, lower pressure, more comfortable seat, and even more padded shorts but it was too stiff and my back was killing me.

Seven took the bike back, stripped it, welded in thinner stays (and a new seat tube so no weld marks would show, built it again, and gave it back. Others may claim chainstays should not make a difference but that is the only other thing that was changed and to me it did make a huge change and the bike was amazing after that.

Try everything you can and then make a decision.

Life is to short to ride uncomfortable bikes.
Thanks man. That's a great and thoughtful response.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-07-2018, 05:36 PM
ultraman6970 ultraman6970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22,852
Op do you have a picture of the bike in question?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-07-2018, 05:56 PM
NYCfixie NYCfixie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 10065
Posts: 932
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikmcconnell View Post
Thanks man. That's a great and thoughtful response.
And, like you I ride small frames (53.5 ETT) so things like stiffness can be amplified. Even custom butted 16mm stays will give a harsher ride on a 53.5 bike then say a 58.5 bike.

I think one of the worst things you can do for small bikes is the tapered headtube/headset. Smaller frames do not need more stiffness in the front or back. By their nature (geometry, physics, etc.) they are stiffer than a larger frame built with the same tube thicknesses. Thankfully some production bikes are using tapered headtubes in 1.25 on their smaller frames and 1.5 on their larger frames.

Feel free to PM me if you want to discuss offline.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:04 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikmcconnell View Post
Hi,

I've got a Indy Fab Ti Crown Jewel Disc. Had it for five years but haven't been doing much riding (babies).

I'm now getting back on it and am thinking that it might be too stiff. It just kills me on longer rides - I can feel absolutely everything on the road - to the point I think I can feel a wheel pulsing that's a fraction of a millimetre out of true.

It was built with oversized tubes (down tube, head tube and BB), and I'm only a little guy (53.7cm TT - I'm 168cm and about 65kg). It's a stunning bike, but I think might not be right for my purposes.

I'm thinking I might have a great crit bike for racing on perfect tarmac (which we don't have here in NZ) but a not so great other purposes bike.

Thoughts?
Haven’t read all the responses but bigger tires and less psi in ’em.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:06 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraman6970 View Post
Op do you have a picture of the bike in question?
Here is the frameset: http://www.ifrider.com/titanium-crown-jewel-special/
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:08 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Of the things discussed so far:

1. Carbon bars. Yes, those might be stiffer than the alloy bars they replaced. Carbon bars aren't built for flex, they are built to resist damage. Probably not a big deal, though.

2. Fork. I doubt you'll find a soft riding disc fork, especially one with the tapered head tube.

3. Frame. I disagree with Peter's post - despite the general shape of diamond bike frames, many do ride softer than others.

4. Wheels. Sure, some ride softer, but softer riding wheels don't necessarily last as long as reasonably stiff wheels. Maybe not such a great place to put a ton of flex into.

5. Tires. This is kind of key, because the only time we really need to worry about the stiffness of forks, frames or bars is when we are using low volume tires. I won't say that the line is at 28c or 32c, but once the tire volume gets large enough it simply doesn't matter what the rest of the bike is doing. I guarantee that a Homer Hilson would also beat most of us up with 23c tires. 23 and 25c tires are for rim brake racing bikes with forks and stays designed to absorb vibration and bumps, not handle braking stresses.


For the kind of bike the OP has, I don't see any reason not to just put some larger volume tires on it and solve all the issues in one go. It isn't a racing bike and should be equipped in a way that matches its design.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:11 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikmcconnell View Post
Yup, that's "oversize" for Ti, especially in a small size. Once tubes get large enough it doesn't matter what the material is.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:12 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCfixie View Post
And, like you I ride small frames (53.5 ETT) so things like stiffness can be amplified. Even custom butted 16mm stays will give a harsher ride on a 53.5 bike then say a 58.5 bike.

I think one of the worst things you can do for small bikes is the tapered headtube/headset. Smaller frames do not need more stiffness in the front or back. By their nature (geometry, physics, etc.) they are stiffer than a larger frame built with the same tube thicknesses. Thankfully some production bikes are using tapered headtubes in 1.25 on their smaller frames and 1.5 on their larger frames.

Feel free to PM me if you want to discuss offline.
Yeah, will message.

I can't remember the taper on the fork. I think it's 1.25 to 1.125 - I'm pretty sure it's not 1.5 (I don't think they did them back in 2012 when it was built)

I've just gone back and looked at the build sheet and it's specified "44mm head tube, oversized tubing all around."

Would be an epic crit bike.

I'll see what I can do to get it to settle down and I've just tee'd up a test ride on a 'Dale from the LBS just in case.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:13 PM
Bob Ross's Avatar
Bob Ross Bob Ross is offline
Registered (ab)User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikmcconnell View Post
These tyres: 25mm GP 4000s, 25mm

These pressures: 65 front 70 rear
Holy crap, I got nothing. 25c tires at 70psi or lower would feel like wading in jello to me.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:15 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
Yup, that's "oversize" for Ti, especially in a small size. Once tubes get large enough it doesn't matter what the material is.
Yeah, this is all rather obvious in retrospect.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:16 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Ross View Post
Holy crap, I got nothing. 25c tires at 70psi or lower would feel like wading in jello to me.
You need some wheelworks wheels ;-)

Those rims and those tyres at those pressures on that bike are way harder than 110 psi on Kinlins on my C40
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:20 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
Of the things discussed so far:

1. Carbon bars. Yes, those might be stiffer than the alloy bars they replaced. Carbon bars aren't built for flex, they are built to resist damage. Probably not a big deal, though.

2. Fork. I doubt you'll find a soft riding disc fork, especially one with the tapered head tube.

3. Frame. I disagree with Peter's post - despite the general shape of diamond bike frames, many do ride softer than others.

4. Wheels. Sure, some ride softer, but softer riding wheels don't necessarily last as long as reasonably stiff wheels. Maybe not such a great place to put a ton of flex into.

5. Tires. This is kind of key, because the only time we really need to worry about the stiffness of forks, frames or bars is when we are using low volume tires. I won't say that the line is at 28c or 32c, but once the tire volume gets large enough it simply doesn't matter what the rest of the bike is doing. I guarantee that a Homer Hilson would also beat most of us up with 23c tires. 23 and 25c tires are for rim brake racing bikes with forks and stays designed to absorb vibration and bumps, not handle braking stresses.


For the kind of bike the OP has, I don't see any reason not to just put some larger volume tires on it and solve all the issues in one go. It isn't a racing bike and should be equipped in a way that matches its design.
LBS is going to call when the 28s are in and I'll throw them on and see how they go. Clearance will be my next issue.

No one was thinking of putting 28s on bikes back in 2012. It's got the ENVE 1.0 Road Disc Fork which I'm told will take 28s (but only just - ENVE only say it'll take 25s apparently).

Being told that and just doing a cursory visual inspection, I'm more concerned about the chainstay clearance.

We'll see. If they don't fit on the IF they'll be good on the Ritchey.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:21 PM
John H. John H. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,641
IF Ti

I also had an IF ti that I thought was too stiff. It was a hardtail mtb.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:23 PM
mikmcconnell mikmcconnell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H. View Post
I also had an IF ti that I thought was too stiff. It was a hardtail mtb.
Hmmm, that's telling. When was it built?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-07-2018, 06:31 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H. View Post
I also had an IF ti that I thought was too stiff. It was a hardtail mtb.
What does a too-stiff bike with 2" tires feel like?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.