#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Op do you have a picture of the bike in question?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
And, like you I ride small frames (53.5 ETT) so things like stiffness can be amplified. Even custom butted 16mm stays will give a harsher ride on a 53.5 bike then say a 58.5 bike.
I think one of the worst things you can do for small bikes is the tapered headtube/headset. Smaller frames do not need more stiffness in the front or back. By their nature (geometry, physics, etc.) they are stiffer than a larger frame built with the same tube thicknesses. Thankfully some production bikes are using tapered headtubes in 1.25 on their smaller frames and 1.5 on their larger frames. Feel free to PM me if you want to discuss offline. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Here is the frameset: http://www.ifrider.com/titanium-crown-jewel-special/
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Of the things discussed so far:
1. Carbon bars. Yes, those might be stiffer than the alloy bars they replaced. Carbon bars aren't built for flex, they are built to resist damage. Probably not a big deal, though. 2. Fork. I doubt you'll find a soft riding disc fork, especially one with the tapered head tube. 3. Frame. I disagree with Peter's post - despite the general shape of diamond bike frames, many do ride softer than others. 4. Wheels. Sure, some ride softer, but softer riding wheels don't necessarily last as long as reasonably stiff wheels. Maybe not such a great place to put a ton of flex into. 5. Tires. This is kind of key, because the only time we really need to worry about the stiffness of forks, frames or bars is when we are using low volume tires. I won't say that the line is at 28c or 32c, but once the tire volume gets large enough it simply doesn't matter what the rest of the bike is doing. I guarantee that a Homer Hilson would also beat most of us up with 23c tires. 23 and 25c tires are for rim brake racing bikes with forks and stays designed to absorb vibration and bumps, not handle braking stresses. For the kind of bike the OP has, I don't see any reason not to just put some larger volume tires on it and solve all the issues in one go. It isn't a racing bike and should be equipped in a way that matches its design. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I can't remember the taper on the fork. I think it's 1.25 to 1.125 - I'm pretty sure it's not 1.5 (I don't think they did them back in 2012 when it was built) I've just gone back and looked at the build sheet and it's specified "44mm head tube, oversized tubing all around." Would be an epic crit bike. I'll see what I can do to get it to settle down and I've just tee'd up a test ride on a 'Dale from the LBS just in case. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Holy crap, I got nothing. 25c tires at 70psi or lower would feel like wading in jello to me.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, this is all rather obvious in retrospect.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Those rims and those tyres at those pressures on that bike are way harder than 110 psi on Kinlins on my C40 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
No one was thinking of putting 28s on bikes back in 2012. It's got the ENVE 1.0 Road Disc Fork which I'm told will take 28s (but only just - ENVE only say it'll take 25s apparently). Being told that and just doing a cursory visual inspection, I'm more concerned about the chainstay clearance. We'll see. If they don't fit on the IF they'll be good on the Ritchey. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
IF Ti
I also had an IF ti that I thought was too stiff. It was a hardtail mtb.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm, that's telling. When was it built?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
What does a too-stiff bike with 2" tires feel like?
|
|
|