Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Yesterday, 06:52 PM
irideti irideti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 216
Best Rim Inner Width for XC

I've been running 2.25 tires on my hardtail for decades but might try 2.40 in the future. What's the optimal inner width for these tires? I just had spokes cut off on my old wheelset since the rear Stans Crest Mk3 have crack around nipples. These rims have 23mm inner with. I'm planning to reuse those lovely CK hubs. My wheel builder told me to get a wider inner since wider 'pinches' tire less for more optimal shape. Should I go for 24, 25 or even wider inner?

I know this forum loves BTLOS but I'm still debating between BTLOS and Lightbicycle.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 07:45 PM
Buzz Killington Buzz Killington is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Rosendale NY
Posts: 406
Question

30mm
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Yesterday, 07:47 PM
dddd dddd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,289
Are you regularly testing the limits of your current setup's pinching tendencies?

If not, then the width change might be little more than theoretical and debatable.

Do you ride in low-traction regions having hard-pack surfaces covered with loose soil? I do myself, and for my riding I prefer a wider rim to spread out the tread cap flatter, since I can't lean aggressively on the slippery surfaces.
At low pressure, the flatter tread cap gets pulled under the rim (in a favorable way) under cornering loads and off-camber surfaces anyway.

At some point, a much-wider rim will increase pinching tendencies (from my own limited experience using very wide rims with 2.3 and 2.4" tires), but you seem to be homing in on a narrower range of much narrower rim widths than I've used.

Carbon rims will allow you to increase rim width and depth at little cost in added weight, so some modest increase in rim width makes sense to me.

For XC racing, take note of what other XC riders are using in your geographical area.

Last edited by dddd; Yesterday at 07:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Yesterday, 08:51 PM
yarbsr02 yarbsr02 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 379
2nd vote for 30mm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Yesterday, 09:17 PM
EB EB is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: This is a no biking trail, California
Posts: 2,837
28 to 30mm.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Yesterday, 09:18 PM
Jaybee Jaybee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: 303
Posts: 4,408
My XC bike has a set of 25mm wide alloy rims and some 30mm carbons. Maybe placebo, but for the same tires in widths from 2.25 to 2.4, the sidewall support through corners and grip feels much more secure on the wider rims. The 25s are fine and I can't remember the last time I pinched, but the 30s are just more fun.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Yesterday, 10:04 PM
catchourbreath catchourbreath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 723
29mm ID on 2.4s riding NYC area trails feels pretty supported and haven't had any problems
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Yesterday, 11:21 PM
irideti irideti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 216
Is 2.25 tire going be much wider on 30mm inner? Or a non-issue for MTB since tire is already much wider than the rim. I'm concerning about clearance.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Yesterday, 11:52 PM
Rev Bob Dobbs Rev Bob Dobbs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 7
29-30mm. I write 29mm because Enve M5’s (which I ride and race) spec as 29mm. With that said, 30mm historically is my preferred width. However, I don’t think 1mm makes a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Today, 05:36 AM
Hilltopperny's Avatar
Hilltopperny Hilltopperny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Lassellsville NY
Posts: 10,436
I'm running 27 id on my cross country bikes with 2.25-2.4" tires with no regrets! They feel great for their intended purpose with zero wheel flop when aired down and set up tubeless.

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Today, 06:00 AM
nspace nspace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Milton, ON
Posts: 179
Same with experience 27mm here. A set of WeAreOne Faction 29er rims and 2.35” Schwalbes. It’s a fantastic setup and great warranty should I need it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Today, 06:03 AM
KonaSS KonaSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,122
I ride 30s. Think anything in the 27-30 range works well.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Today, 07:22 AM
Applesauce's Avatar
Applesauce Applesauce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Rocky Canadian mountains
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by nspace View Post
Same with experience 27mm here. A set of WeAreOne Faction 29er rims and 2.35” Schwalbes. It’s a fantastic setup and great warranty should I need it.
I run Factions on both my “big” bike and my XC race bike. They’re simply the best, and from the best manufacturer. I’ve ridden wider (and lord knows, we’ve all ridden narrower), and I don’t like how it squares off a tire. This is especially true on tires with minimal side knobs, like XC racing tires. Maybe less of an issue on the free ride tires most folks seem to run these days.

OP, if you’re considering carbon - and I would only be considering carbon - I would only consider rims with a lifetime “warranty” (actually a replacement policy, I would call it). I can’t remember the last time I pinched a tire on my XC bike, but I can definitely remember the last time I cracked a rim, or hit the rim hard enough to destroy aluminum.

Last edited by Applesauce; Today at 07:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Today, 07:39 AM
nspace nspace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Milton, ON
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Applesauce View Post
I run Factions on both my “big” bike and my XC race bike. They’re simply the best, and from the best manufacturer. I’ve ridden wider (and lord knows, we’ve all ridden narrower), and I don’t like how it squares off a tire. This is especially true on tires with minimal side knobs, like XC racing tires. Maybe less of an issue on the free ride tires most folks seem to run these days.

OP, if you’re considering carbon - and I would only be considering carbon - I would only consider rims with a lifetime “warranty” (actually a replacement policy, I would call it). I can’t remember the last time I pinched a tire on my XC bike, but I can definitely remember the last time I cracked a rim, or hit the rim hard enough to destroy aluminum.
+1 to the warranty and the tire profile! Keep an eye out for any promos around the holdidays. This is when I bought my rims, and got them for $340 CAD ($244 usd) each. I wish I bought another set.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Today, 07:57 AM
eri eri is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 19
I ride 2.35 to 2.6 on light bicycle ‘930s’ that have 30mm internal width. The 2.35 (maxxis dhf exo) are much more controlled.than the same tire on a 24mm internal width tire. I’d no idea how unnatural the narrow rimmed wheel behaved.

The other thing wide carbon rims allow is an asymmetrical spoke bed. Spoke length and tension were just about perfect left to right with that rim (and ck hubs.)

I’m skeptical about the value of lifetime rims. The ones I’ve seen don’t include rebuilding. Aluminum rims dent and ‘wear out’ but I’ve never broken a carbon rim so I’m happy to just stay in the lower price end of the market.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_0715.jpeg (39.5 KB, 77 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.