Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2022, 03:57 PM
d_douglas d_douglas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 10,090
converting SUspension fork to rigid fork - details?

Hi all,

I am in process of ridding my son of the worn old suspension fork on his commuter bike to make it more commuter friendly and I need some help.

It is a 10+ yr old RockShox Reba or Judy that has leaks and work stanchions. I think the travel is either 80-100mm. I have locked it out so at least it isnt bouncing.

The frame is a 16" Norco hardtail (name escapes me, but its a decent alloy one about 10yrs old).

If I replace the fork with a rigid equivalent, how long should the A-C be? It is for conmmuting so I dont want it to be a sled. The frame takes a straight steerer and uses disc brakes only.

Am I looking at a 425-440mm rigid fork? One shop I called suggested a 460mm, but that sounds too tall for this purpose.

I guess secondly, does anyone have one for sale that is affordable?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2022, 04:01 PM
AngryScientist's Avatar
AngryScientist AngryScientist is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northeast NJ
Posts: 34,146
What does the current fork's AC measure in it's current locked out state?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2022, 04:03 PM
p nut p nut is offline
n - 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,818
Assuming this is a 26” mountain bike w v-brakes? And 1 1/8” HT?

I’d stick to ~420mm.

Surly Troll fork is currently available. May be able to find one used here or eBay.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2022, 04:05 PM
nmrt nmrt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,121
I think for suspension forks, the a-c to keep in mind would be the actual a-c minus 10-15% sag. This should be the a-c for the rigid fork.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2022, 04:19 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,202
If I did a conversion like this I would probably choose a fork that would trade a bit of steering quickness for more stability for a commuter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2022, 04:49 PM
Alistair Alistair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,092
What wheel size? 26, 650/27.5, or 29er?

What headtube? 1.125" or tapered?

QR or TA?

Assuming 26 wheels, straight head tube, and QR, you're best bet is finding a used Kona P2 from that era. Swap/replace crown race, install fork, and you're done.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2024, 08:41 AM
Veloo's Avatar
Veloo Veloo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,413
I'm going through this process for my 1997 Quadra 21R forks. I think the elastomers finally crapped out this year. I have been noticing slight discomfort in my commutes lately.

Rebuild kit would be about $70 USD but I was hoping to save some weight wih a rigid fork and not sure if the plastic parts of my fork would survive a disassembly/reassembly.

Urbane has this which is the right price but only 0.6 lbs lighter and the A-C is 395. Supposedly my A-C is 408.
https://www.ucycle.com/fork-26-threa...-w-bosses.html

Bit of a(nother) crazy thought entered my head: what if I just 3D print some rigid elastomers. Don't care about suspension since this MTB is a commuter now and the 3D parts so far seem to be fine in compression, just not so much in tension.

So some food for thought. If you want to try this crazy idea, I'd be happy to print some rigid elastomers for you.

So regret not getting that $100 carbon rigid 26 canti fork from Nashbar many years ago.

Last edited by Veloo; 10-13-2024 at 08:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2024, 09:16 AM
Spoker Spoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 462
I would go as low as you can go with your BB height . The steeper HA will be OK but having your feet close to the ground is safer and nicer.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-13-2024, 09:24 AM
coffeecherrypie coffeecherrypie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veloo View Post
So regret not getting that $100 carbon rigid 26 canti fork from Nashbar many years ago.
I had that fork, pretty sure it was "carbon" in name only. Very heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-13-2024, 11:26 AM
Veloo's Avatar
Veloo Veloo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,413
Here's another option if you're up for it and can find polyurethane rod.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LY2jA0sILms
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-13-2024, 11:28 AM
mstateglfr's Avatar
mstateglfr mstateglfr is online now
Sunshine
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Des Moines IA
Posts: 1,990
Look at Carver fork. They come in multiple A-C options and are simple but solid. One is in the 420mm range.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-13-2024, 11:53 AM
litcrazy litcrazy is offline
litcrazy
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 430
I imagine it’s quick release and if 10 years old is possibly 29er.
If 29er you’ll be happy with 468mm axle to crown. If 26” likely 440.

I love salsa quick release cro moto forks but they are getting harder to find. The soma range steel ones are supposed to be similarly more supple than surly forks. I have the soma/potts collaboration is 420 and it’s wonderful. A nice steel fork should feel a lot better than the old shock and is less worry when locking a commute than carbon in my mind. Carbon is more vulnerable to the person next to you whacking it by accident as they lock up.

Soma has been having lots of 15-30% off sales. If you can’t find the right length in a salsa form, I’d sign up for the soma email list and get a tange form at the next sale. The should have the right length. I think they do 425, 445, 468, 480 still.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-13-2024, 01:47 PM
PacNW2Ford PacNW2Ford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,408
My build sheet for a 2007 IF Steel Deluxe built for a 80mm travel suspension corrected rigid fork shows a 430mm A-C dimension.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-13-2024, 01:48 PM
PacNW2Ford PacNW2Ford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,408
^ for 26” wheel.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-13-2024, 05:20 PM
KonaSS KonaSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,134
It is entirely possible to overthink this. I would take the axle to crown measurement of the current fork and subtract ~20mm for sag, and then look for something close-ish to that. 15-20mm either way isn't going to matter.

Put another way, in the last 10 years I have ridden XC mtbs with head angles that range from 72-66 and all of them would have worked just fine as a commuter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.