Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 12-29-2017, 10:42 AM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
One of my gripes is to call anything 'BB' or 'axle' a 'standard'...a lot of this 'stuff, I'm glad to be away from..I don't have to
as the saying goes, the nice thing about standards is that everyone can have their own. The ever proliferating axle standard progression is really annoying. I had just bought TA dummy axles and then Boost came along and 12mm road front TA. Those $100 sets of dummy axles for each variant really start to add up. Why the road guys didn't just go with 100mm 15mm TA, I am choosing to not understand.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-30-2017, 01:46 PM
m_moses's Avatar
m_moses m_moses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Posts: 908
I thought this video by Raoul Luescher about BB30/PF30 was interesting. He makes some valid points about tolerances in production environments that lead to less than ideal installations.

https://youtu.be/RFa5HBfRhnE


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Mick

My blog and Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-30-2017, 01:49 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
as the saying goes, the nice thing about standards is that everyone can have their own. The ever proliferating axle standard progression is really annoying. I had just bought TA dummy axles and then Boost came along and 12mm road front TA. Those $100 sets of dummy axles for each variant really start to add up. Why the road guys didn't just go with 100mm 15mm TA, I am choosing to not understand.
15mm vs 12mm is so heavy and un-aero, duh, and everybody knows it....

->

That’s why when I crimp my cable condoms I do it fore-aft direction, for aero ness. Geeez don you know nuthin?
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-30-2017, 03:24 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_moses View Post
I thought this video by Raoul Luescher about BB30/PF30 was interesting. He makes some valid points about tolerances in production environments that lead to less than ideal installations.

https://youtu.be/RFa5HBfRhnE


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It's funny how the press fit BBs of the '80s had excellent reputations but bike companies today can't manage to make a straight how to press bearings into.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-30-2017, 04:53 PM
Black Dog's Avatar
Black Dog Black Dog is offline
Riding Along
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rockwood ON, Canada
Posts: 6,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
It's funny how the press fit BBs of the '80s had excellent reputations but bike companies today can't manage to make a straight how to press bearings into.
In the 80's they were machining steel (edit: I meant to say metal here) BB shells for the bearings to press into. Molding a high tolerance opening with carbon fibre is a different beast. The molds may be perfect but the thing coming out of them rarely is. Look at the rear triangle alignment of many high end CF production frames.
__________________
Cheers...Daryl
Life is too important to be taken seriously

Last edited by Black Dog; 12-31-2017 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-30-2017, 07:06 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Dog View Post
In the 80's they were machining steel BB shells for the bearings to press into. Molding a high tolerance opening with carbon fibre is a different beast. The molds may be perfect but the thing coming out of them rarely is. Look at the rear triangle alignment of many high end CF production frames.
Steel, aluminum and titanium. I had thought many of the issues where with aluminum Cannondales and aluminum shells in carbon. Does anyone make a carbon BB30 shell with the circlips?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12-31-2017, 07:04 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
It's funny how the press fit BBs of the '80s had excellent reputations but bike companies today can't manage to make a straight how to press bearings into.
Merlin, Klein..I guess except when you wanted to change a crank or find the merlin tool kit..They worked pretty well but were no fun to work on.

And didn't Merlin offer a freebie, convert to threaded BB shell, once upon a time?
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 12-31-2017, 07:30 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
And didn't Merlin offer a freebie, convert to threaded BB shell, once upon a time?
Yes they did have a program to swap BB shells. This involved cutting out the orginal shell, and welding in a new shell (joints with the downtube, seat tube and chainstay rewelded). I know at least one person who had his frame converted. My recollection was that the service was reasonably priced (a few hundred dollars), but it definitely not free.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12-31-2017, 11:30 AM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
I'm surprised they didn't just sleeve it - I recall the shell was fairly thick if they were to bore it out.

Otherwise, there's just enough material to just thread it Italian.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 12-31-2017, 11:33 AM
Cicli Cicli is offline
Lanterne rouge
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oro Valley Az.
Posts: 7,194
Well, four pages and I an still glad I jave a threaded bottom bracket on everything. Even if this Roubaix is lower end.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 12-31-2017, 11:57 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
I'm surprised they didn't just sleeve it - I recall the shell was fairly thick if they were to bore it out.

Otherwise, there's just enough material to just thread it Italian.
Merlin pressed in BBs used cartridge bearings with a 30mm OD. The OD of the shell wasn't much bigger than the 1.37" (34.8mm) ISO thread diameter, so there wasn't enough metal to ream out the BB and cut threads. On the plus side, the small original BB shell meant that the frame tubes had a little extra length, so they could be cut and mitered for the larger threaded shell.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12-31-2017, 12:19 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Merlin pressed in BBs used cartridge bearings with a 30mm OD. The OD of the shell wasn't much bigger than the 1.37" (34.8mm) ISO thread diameter, so there wasn't enough metal to ream out the BB and cut threads. On the plus side, the small original BB shell meant that the frame tubes had a little extra length, so they could be cut and mitered for the larger threaded shell.
I just had a brain freeze - I was thinking Klein, not Merlin. Yeah, the Merlin's where too small AND thin walled to screw with.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.