Transgender woman wins UCI track championship

[velomateo]

Here you go....

https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/10/...omens-cycling/

[livingminimal]

cool, congrats to her!

[jtbadge]

The language in that linked story is hateful and gross.

Congratulations to her.

[Aaron O]

I don't know how to feel about this. I don't want to challenge/attack transgender...but I think it's also unfair competition.

[William]

Originally Posted by Aaron O

I don't know how to feel about this. I don't want to challenge/attack transgender...but I think it's also unfair competition.

Just questioning something doesn't equate to attacking.






William

[William]

This topic can go off the rails very quickly. Short leash here so if you want to discuss without getting out of line...do so. Otherwise....







William

[mktng]

i dont know enough about this whole topic to really have a view on it.

i know alot of women who race locally, that i've asked, have no issues with racing against transgender women. its not like they are showing up and ripping legs off other women.

good for her.
being WC. just brings more light to the subject.

[echappist]

Originally Posted by mktng

i dont know enough about this whole topic to really have a view on it.

i know alot of women who race locally, that i've asked, have no issues with racing against transgender women. its not like they are showing up and ripping legs off other women.

good for her.
being WC. just brings more light to the subject.

In her case, it actually is, at least when it doesnt involve aerobic efforts. Her physiological advantages are real and solely due to having been beneficiary of formerly high testosterone levels.

Having her compete is fine, but we should not pretend that she’d be where she is right now had she transitioned in her teens (cf. as someone in her 30s). Morally, she did not cheat, but physiologically, it’s as if she’s been on T for more than a decade, all without the negative consequences that comes with an e tended regimen of T

[nooneline]

Originally Posted by Aaron O

I don't know how to feel about this. I don't want to challenge/attack transgender...but I think it's also unfair competition.

Science disagrees. There are rigorous standards for hormonal levels of trans participants that are set by the IOC - many, in fact, feel that they are an extremely conservative overreach to more than ensure that it's NOT unfair competition. The 101 version is that hormonal transition results in loss of physiological benefits (bone density and musculature) that are associated with previous exposure to male hormones.

[velomateo]

Originally Posted by nooneline

Science disagrees. There are rigorous standards for hormonal levels of trans participants that are set by the IOC - many, in fact, feel that they are an extremely conservative overreach to more than ensure that it's NOT unfair competition. The 101 version is that hormonal transition results in loss of physiological benefits (bone density and musculature) that are associated with testosterone and androgen (male hormones).

Are these levels tested just like a PED test?

[nooneline]

Originally Posted by velomateo

Are these levels tested just like a PED test?

Not exactly - a PED test involves USADA approaching you after an event. For this purposes, athletes submit tests from qualified medical personnel.

Despite that difference, trans women are subjected to far more testing than other participants. Nobody else has to prove what their hormone levels are before being allowed to compete. USAC's policy, which is based on the IOC's, states:

• The athlete must demonstrate that her total testosterone level in serum has been below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months prior to her first competition (with the requirement for any longer period to be based on a confidential case-by-case evaluation, considering whether or not 12 months is a sufficient length of time to minimize any advantage in women’s competition).
• The athlete's total testosterone level in serum must remain below 10 nmol/L throughout the period of desired eligibility to compete in the female category.
• Compliance with these conditions may be monitored by random or for-cause testing. In the event of non-compliance, the athlete’s eligibility for female competition will be suspended for 12 months.

[MattTuck]

Sex determination is complicated, and the biological causes of transsexuality are not completely understood. I'd expect that as we understand more about the causes, we'll have a better idea whether hormone levels should be the gold standard for ruling an individual out of competition.

I think it is all we've got right now, but it seems (to me) to be a fairly blunt instrument given that every situation has its own biological and psychological underpinnings, and seems quite complex.

[daker13]

The transgender person competing in sports thing is a dog whistle topic that usually just serves to rile people up.

[earlfoss]

Eyeroll at that podium pic. Sure, great job there.

[yinzerniner]

The article the OP linked to is a disgrace.

For a better and more nuanced view on the situation at hand read this article which compares the differing views of two transgender female cyclists, one of whom was the UCI winner:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ess/995434001/

My $.02, which counts for even less than that, is if the rules were followed as set by the UCI congrats on her victory. And for those who are confused about the UCI's transgender rules, read below:

https://www.usacycling.org/about-us/...thletes-policy