has anyone seen a more beautiful bike than this? - Page 5

colker · #61 04-19-2020, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robertbb

Why the dislike for Thomson seat-post on the first page?

(Not that I particularly like them... just know that plenty of ppl seem to swoon on them)

I like it. The fact it is light, tough and works w/ micro adjust letting you find the exact seat position makes it look right to me. The stems otoh have a bad rep so i dislike it.

IJWS · #62 04-19-2020, 10:00 PM

His had me rethinking “everything” all weekend long

https://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=250226

macaroon · #63 04-20-2020, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nmrt

i do not think i have ever seen a more beautiful bike.

Disc brakes look better on these modern carbon frames, steel suits rim brakes IMO. Same goes for the new Shimano groupsets. Steel and Campagnolo is a good match. Thomson finishing kit is not the most elegant, and that saddle is a bit of a minger. Still a very nice bike though.

macaroon · #64 04-20-2020, 02:13 AM

That De Rosa is very nice, but the stem is too short and if a bike has a level top tube, then the stem should be the same angle (-17).

Velocipede · #65 04-20-2020, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macaroon

That De Rosa is very nice, but the stem is too short and if a bike has a level top tube, then the stem should be the same angle (-17).

I disagree. The stem length looks fine. Looks like a 100mm. Angle wise, I don't see an issue with it either. Whatever fits is key.

FlashUNC · #66 04-20-2020, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robertbb

Why the dislike for Thomson seat-post on the first page?

(Not that I particularly like them... just know that plenty of ppl seem to swoon on them)

Because rather than make a proper setback seatpost they made some sort of dog's crooked red rocket. It's atrocious.

And to answer the OP, yes, I have.

macaroon · #67 04-20-2020, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Velocipede

I disagree. The stem length looks fine. Looks like a 100mm. Angle wise, I don't see an issue with it either. Whatever fits is key.

Yes, but the thread is about aesthetically pleasing bikes, not whatever fits is key.

Velocipede · #68 04-20-2020, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashUNC

Because rather than make a proper setback seatpost they made some sort of dog's crooked red rocket. It's atrocious.

And to answer the OP, yes, I have.

The started making a post with real setback. But everyone was like why?

Velocipede · #69 04-20-2020, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macaroon

Yes, but the thread is about aesthetically pleasing bikes, not whatever fits is key.

I am fine with the looks. If it were me buying it, I'd be fine with it. It's not like a 135 degree stem or anything.

d_douglas · #70 04-20-2020, 09:40 AM

That is a beautiful bike. Ive never seen one in the flesh, but it is no doubt finely detailed and exquisitely finished.

I would ride that with great joy!

FlashUNC · #71 04-20-2020, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Velocipede

The started making a post with real setback. But everyone was like why?

Did they ever actually release if? I've never seen one in the wild and it doesn't appear to be on their site.

And even that version is ugly.

Velocipede · #72 04-20-2020, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashUNC

Did they ever actually release if? I've never seen one in the wild and it doesn't appear to be on their site.

And even that version is ugly.

No, they never did. I have a few of the prototypes here but there aren't many floating around in general. Maybe a dozen made? It's funny how many people used to ask about one and saying they'd buy it but when they did, everyone was like, WHY? It was really odd. I have prototype Masterpiece Carbons as well. And carbon cradles.

FlashUNC · #73 04-20-2020, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Velocipede

No, they never did. I have a few of the prototypes here but there aren't many floating around in general. Maybe a dozen made? It's funny how many people used to ask about one and saying they'd buy it but when they did, everyone was like, WHY? It was really odd. I have prototype Masterpiece Carbons as well. And carbon cradles.

Thomson can't get alloy bits right, no way I'd ever trust them with carbon.

madsciencenow · #74 04-20-2020, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashUNC

Thomson can't get alloy bits right, no way I'd ever trust them with carbon.

Their carbon bar is ok. I’m not sure they make it but it works as well as other CF bars I own.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Velocipede · #75 04-20-2020, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlashUNC

Thomson can't get alloy bits right, no way I'd ever trust them with carbon.

You're trusting them with carbon and aluminum every time you fly a Dreamliner or Boeing plane. The 787 Dreamliner wing spar was made in China and then shipped to the US(Washington). Boeing found out that China screwed up the placement of some holes on the wing. Thomson had to do the refitting. They rearranged the shop floor and made a special section for them to get worked on. They had to drill holes and fit new pieces they were making in-house for the wings. They also had to do carbon lay-up on them.

Thomson has been doing carbon for 20 years. The first carbon bars and seatposts were designed and made in-house. Same with the ti bars and posts. Then it was Lynskey making the ti parts Then the carbon and ti parts shifted to Asia. Lynskey couldn't do the bars and post consistently without issues/failure and the carbon parts, they ruled they didn't have the time to do it. They started the carbon stuff at the time the wing spars came in. They didn't have the space and manpower to do both. So they shifted it overseas. It is a proprietary design though.

They do do things right. There is a ton of Thomson made parts on planes we scoot around on.