Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2021, 04:29 PM
Chicago Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
Waterford praise

I wanted to pass on my impressions of a custom Waterford I received about 5 months ago. This is my 3rd custom bike, the first ffrom Waterford. I am not a racer, I’m not interested in the lightest bike, and my main focus with this bike was comfort and fun. As you can see in the picture, the bike is set up with platform pedals, which is consistent with the type of riding I do. The geometry of the frame is very relaxed, with a long wheelbase. The geometry is similar to what you would find on a Rivendell. I also have the handlebars about 40 mm above the saddle. Again, this is consistent with the type of riding I do. Now for the review: I can’t overstate how comfortable the ride is. It rides like a Cadillac. It is by far the most comfortable bike I have ever ridden. The ride has that distinct steel feel that many love. For anyone looking for a custom steel frame, I would strongly consider Waterford, especially if you are looking for an extremely comfortable ride. I forgot to mention, this frame was built to take up to 40 mm tires. Thanks for looking!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 226BE58E-6A31-46FA-A5A4-84EC95F4B991.jpg (144.8 KB, 1121 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2021, 05:03 PM
oliver1850's Avatar
oliver1850 oliver1850 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: northern IL
Posts: 9,212
Three Waterford built frames here. Would love to have one custom built to take 40 mm tires one day. Photo from a ride early last March, sounds like we may get snow this week.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mini-Saul Trail Sign 2.jpg (92.5 KB, 1083 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2021, 05:14 PM
weisan's Avatar
weisan weisan is online now
ZhugeLiang
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Back in Austin, Texas
Posts: 17,457
Most excellent!

Know thyself.

Know thybike.

Ride.

Ride More.
__________________
🏻*
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2021, 05:27 PM
Indy Indy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 176
Beautiful frame and a great build to go along! Congrats!

I too am considering a Rivendell like custom frame, but want to have shorter chai stays. Would you mind posting the geo?
If you don’t mind, could you share what a custom frame like that would cost?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2021, 06:10 PM
sokyroadie sokyroadie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, KY
Posts: 2,937
Really nice bike, but why so many spacers and positive rise stem on a custom frame. Just curious if that was your choice?
__________________
Sonder MTB, Planet X Ti Gravel, Seven Ti, Lynskey Ti
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2021, 06:23 PM
duff_duffy duff_duffy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: southern NJ
Posts: 2,721
I think the alternative (longer head tube/headtube extension) would not look good…I don’t mind the spacer stack - most of my bikes have one as well so am biased

Quote:
Originally Posted by sokyroadie View Post
Really nice bike, but why so many spacers and positive rise stem on a custom frame. Just curious if that was your choice?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2021, 07:02 PM
Chicago Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy View Post
Beautiful frame and a great build to go along! Congrats!

I too am considering a Rivendell like custom frame, but want to have shorter chai stays. Would you mind posting the geo?
If you don’t mind, could you share what a custom frame like that would cost?
Hi Indy,
Thanks for your comments. I tried to upload the geo sheet, but was unable to for some reason. But here are the numbers:

Stack: 659 mm
Reach: 382 mm
Front Center: 643.9 mm min =590.0
Trail: 62.7
Headtube: 222m
Center to top: 565 mm
Ctr to Ctr: 550.6 mm
Theo Ctr to Ctr: 632 mm
Effective Ctr to Ctr: 632.5
Chainstay: 445 mm
Wheelbase: 1076.7
Theo TT: 585 mm
Actual TTL 566.5
TT Slope: 7.9 deg
BB drop: 80 mm
SA: 73.0 deg
HA: 71.0 deg
Saddle height: 775mm
Saddle top to bars: 662 mm
Saddle tip to bars: 511 mm
Bar to Saddle Drop: plus 45 mm
Rake: 55.0

I will continue to try to upload the geo sheet.

In terms of the cost, The frame (Waterford Artisan 22 lugged) with fork was $2700. But I believe the prices have gone up since I purchased it in April. I believe the frame and fork would now be $3625.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2021, 07:04 PM
Chicago Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by sokyroadie View Post
Really nice bike, but why so many spacers and positive rise stem on a custom frame. Just curious if that was your choice?
Hi Sokyroadie,
Thanks for your comments. In terms of the spacers and positive rise stem, I left all the design features to Richard Schwinn. As most of you know, he certainly knows what he is doing, so I left all those types of decisions to him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2021, 07:44 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago View Post
Hi Indy,
Thanks for your comments. I tried to upload the geo sheet, but was unable to for some reason. But here are the numbers:

Stack: 659 mm
Reach: 382 mm
Front Center: 643.9 mm min =590.0
Trail: 62.7
Headtube: 222m
Center to top: 565 mm
Ctr to Ctr: 550.6 mm
Theo Ctr to Ctr: 632 mm
Effective Ctr to Ctr: 632.5
Chainstay: 445 mm
Wheelbase: 1076.7
Theo TT: 585 mm
Actual TTL 566.5
TT Slope: 7.9 deg
BB drop: 80 mm
SA: 73.0 deg
HA: 71.0 deg
Saddle height: 775mm
Saddle top to bars: 662 mm
Saddle tip to bars: 511 mm
Bar to Saddle Drop: plus 45 mm
Rake: 55.0

I will continue to try to upload the geo sheet.

In terms of the cost, The frame (Waterford Artisan 22 lugged) with fork was $2700. But I believe the prices have gone up since I purchased it in April. I believe the frame and fork would now be $3625.
This bike sounds like it was made for me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2021, 08:45 PM
Indy Indy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
This bike sounds like it was made for me.
Same here.
The new F/F cost is a bit out of my reach right now though.

This is a standout geo for the purpose of casual riding. Love it! I am going to bookmark for future reference.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-05-2021, 08:58 PM
Chicago Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indy View Post
Beautiful frame and a great build to go along! Congrats!

I too am considering a Rivendell like custom frame, but want to have shorter chai stays. Would you mind posting the geo?
If you don’t mind, could you share what a custom frame like that would cost?
Hi Indy,
Thanks for your comments. I tried to upload the geo sheet, but was unable to for some reason. But here are the numbers:

Stack: 659 mm
Reach: 382 mm
Front Center: 643.9 mm min =590.0
Trail: 62.7
Headtube: 222m
Center to top: 565 mm
Ctr to Ctr: 550.6 mm
Theo Ctr to Ctr: 632 mm
Effective Ctr to Ctr: 632.5
Chainstay: 445 mm
Wheelbase: 1076.7
Theo TT: 585 mm
Actual TTL 566.5
TT Slope: 7.9 deg
BB drop: 80 mm
SA: 73.0 deg
HA: 71.0 deg
Saddle height: 775mm
Saddle top to bars: 662 mm
Saddle tip to bars: 511 mm
Bar to Saddle Drop: plus 45 mm
Rake: 55.0

I will continue to try to upload the geo sheet.

In terms of the cost, The frame (Waterford Artisan 22 lugged) with fork was $2700. But I believe the prices have gone up since I purchased it in April. I believe the frame and fork would now be $3625.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-05-2021, 09:32 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,048
Wow, that's a big increase in such a short time! Lucky for me I still have my stock 62cm Rambouillet. I still miss my stock Waterford RS11.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2021, 07:40 AM
vaughn vaughn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Congratulations on the lovely bike. Count me in for the Waterford praise choir as well. Mine is a mid 90’s 1250 built with Reynolds 753 as a “Century bike”… slightly more relaxed geometry and taller head tube than the 2200 series. Uber comfy on long rides, though unlike yours, mine can only handle 28’s.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2021, 08:54 AM
Plum Hill Plum Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mascoutah, Illinois
Posts: 1,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by sokyroadie View Post
Really nice bike, but why so many spacers and positive rise stem on a custom frame. Just curious if that was your choice?
Please don’t take this the wrong way, but what would you do?
I can only assume the owner has either, or both, a long leg/short torso body or back issues, necessitating a high bar position. A taller head tube would mean raising the top tube, thereby compromising stand over height.
I fit in both of those classifications. As others have said, that frame would be a good fit for me, too, but I could go for a lower handlebar height.
Not everyone can do the long/low/slammed.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2021, 10:15 AM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by oliver1850 View Post
Three Waterford built frames here. Would love to have one custom built to take 40 mm tires one day. Photo from a ride early last March, sounds like we may get snow this week.

Was wondering who got that tall beauty last year!
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.