#16
|
||||
|
||||
the doors are longer and sometimes harder to open fully in tight spots. you get no more interior room and a bigger hassle to get rear passengers in.
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe it's just me. To me you are just taking a sedan and making it less convenient. They are simply more practical and that seems to be at the heart of your desire/necessity of purchasing a car. Maybe if you think you will never put anything in the backseat or ever carry passengers, but I still come back to "better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it". The car is going to drive the same all other things equal.
And if you are looking specifically a coupe you just narrowed your search big time. There are pretty solid reasons why very few non-sports car coupes have been produced since the 1970s. Assuming you're content with the size of your junk and won't be looking to put $10k worth of Fast & Furious parts on it, you'll be happier with a sedan. I know I would and every friend I've had who has owned a coupe past the age of 21 has wished for the rear doors at some point. If you do look for Corollas, I personally think the S models are worth the premium. Last edited by ColonelJLloyd; 02-17-2017 at 12:46 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
A couple people mentioned the Fit. How tall are you? I drive a Fit, and at 6'3", I wish the seat went a little farther back, but otherwise, it's roomy enough. Chris |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
As much as I like our Fit, it's not very powerful. 75mph up a hill is pushing it a bit in the Fit. OP mentioned this as a consideration, albeit a low priority one.
They're great, practical cars, but not fast. Chris |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Element
cx-5 etc Slightly bigger both inside and out M |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Definitely not fast and furious...ha! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
That's a little different. A coupe is not a hatchback. Some companies call the latter a 3-door.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I loved my Fit as well. But safe? It was rated among the worst in category, unfortunately. But it had a TON of room, especially for its size.
My pick would be an HR-V. Has the same Magic Seat config that makes the Fit such an awesome car. A ton of utility space, in a variety of configurations to fit a ton of cargo. Basically a Fit, but bigger. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Accord or Camry as suggested above is what I'd go with. Enough room, good gas mileage, ability to store things and low maintenance. I've owned both over the years and with regular scheduled maintenance I got well over 200k on both. A subaru impreza hatch would also do all these and my wifes 2014 averages 32 mpg and can more than hold its own in bad northeast winters
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Subaru Forester.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I recently purchased a Certified 2013 Honda Fit. I'm 6 ft 2" and have plenty of head and leg room. I was pleasantly surprised that I can put 2 bikes inside and still have a little room for luggage.
I'd put the power level on par with my old 2008 Honda CRV. Probably not the best choice for mountains. So far I'm averaging around 40 mpg. The 2015 and newer models have a CVT transmission. My 2013 is a 5 speed automatic. I did drive a new 2017 Fit and found it to be OK but really liked the 2013 better. I also own a 2015 Honda Accord that is very nice but doesn't have the room the Fit has. Last edited by biker72; 02-17-2017 at 01:30 PM. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Anyway...will also check out Fit, Camry and Accord. Also the HRV. Philly used to have a program where if you got an electric and put in a charger, you'd get a reserved for electric spot in front of it. Council is apparently getting rid of the rule (was hoping to go that route for my parking). Last edited by Aaron O; 02-17-2017 at 01:34 PM. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Mazda 3 hatch. Drive one, you'll see.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rp7zDpk2-9E
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I just went through this exercise and found the previous FiT iteration to be a bit underpowered (112hp?), even with a 5-speed. The newest variant (from 2015?) was a bit better with 130hp and a 6-speed, although it was a bit buzzy spinning 4000rpm @ 70mph. Fantastic city car though with incredibly intelligent interior packaging.
Loved the 2015 Accord Sport 6-speed I sampled. I thought the asking of $17.2, for a 2.5yo, 25k mile, extremely clean, certified pre-owned was reasonable, although more than I was willing to spend for a secondary vehicle. Nice handling, surprisingly good seats, and plenty of get up and go. Ended up with a bit of an oddball, a 2011 Volvo c30 6-speeed, which probably isn't what you want, but with 225hp, it is fun. Drives a bit different than the Honda's, as there is gobs of low-end torque. Not a terribly roomy hatch, though. Will add a Class 1 receiver to make the occasional bike transport less of a chore. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you're driving a lot you might as well enjoy it.
__________________
明日は明日の風が吹く |
|
|