#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://nyti.ms/1opl7cC |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
only slightly OT: jersey-pocketable film camera?
Re my Nikon Ti35... is there an actual market for something like that these days? I’ll put it up for sale if there is. Like I said, I used it on one cycling trip through the UK one summers. Shot slides. That was it. It is a bit big and heavy for carrying in a jersey pocket for sure. I also had a Yashixa T4. Thought I still had it but couldn’t find it. Maybe I have it to someone. Like many, my iPhone serves as my main camera on rides these days.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Ti35 is a $500+ camera these days.
I used to flip cameras (to buy bikes) but the camera market is insane right now. I sold a Contax t2 data back for a friend the week after one of the Jenner’s was on Jimmie kimmel or something and mentioned that’s the camera they use—sold it in 24 hours for $750 to someone in LA. WITH A BURNT FLASH FILM |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Same goes for the Yashica T4 and several others mentioned. 35mm compacts are having a real renaissance. Some like the Contax T2 or Minolta TC-1 regularly top $1000. On the other hand anything with a zoom lens usually won't fetch more than fifty bucks.
__________________
明日は明日の風が吹く |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
only slightly OT: jersey-pocketable film camera?
But now I use a mirrorless fujifilm X-M1 with 35mm f/2 or pancake 27mm f/2.8. You can find the body very cheap (185$ on EBay). Fuji pro models from around the same year have the same sensor/processor, it takes excellent photos. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by ckamp; 06-16-2018 at 01:01 AM. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Having cut my teeth on film, I second the Fujis. (Some ppl use the Panasonic equivalent, etc)
The reason I say this, is that the Fuji's are the most "film-ey" of the digital cameras, and are calibrated off of their Provia film stock. The X100 will even simulate different black and white film grain... |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
only slightly OT: jersey-pocketable film camera?
Yes, a good point! It's why I went with Fuji and the processing it offers.
My other setup is a Pentax KP with some of the 'legendary' limiteds (77, 43 etc.). I also feel I can can get some film-feel from this setup. (Too big for a jersey pocket, but I felt like talking about it anyway.) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by ckamp; 06-17-2018 at 06:53 PM. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Years later when I discovered and embraced digital I knew I would never go back to film. I sold my Leicas without a whimper. So, in good faith, I have to ask, why are you getting more into film? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
So you’re saying your days, and nights, with film were totally worth it after all.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
.... ..
. . Last edited by cadence90; 07-20-2018 at 09:57 PM. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
I prefer to imagine the best.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
We really should get back to cameras. Bottomline is that as much as I enjoyed film photography, it sucks compared to digital. I can understand how there might be situations when film is still best, but only if you are taking aerial shots from a U2.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-2...but-1528382700 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Back to the original question, I'd only recommend retractable-lens or clamshell design camera. Anything with a lens protruding too much may catch in the jersey pocket.
Or OP can get a "feed bag" and store the camera there. |
|
|