Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 06-02-2023, 10:56 AM
rothwem rothwem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 328
So is anyone a little surprised that SRAM/Shimano/Campy haven't come out with pre-waxed chains? I know there are the $$$ graphene super duper extra space polymer ones sold, but it seems like a hole in the market, given how popular chain waxing has become.

I'd probably get one if I could get a pre-waxed chain for ~$40 or so from shimano and just dunk it in a melted wax bucket for a few minutes every couple weeks. And that's coming from a current non-waxer.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-02-2023, 10:58 AM
benb benb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 9,862
Yes totally. If this is so great, and I'm sure Shimano/SRAM/Campy have pretty serious testing, why are they not pre-selling chains setup this way?

They could even do it both ways for people who don't want to pay the upcharge.

And if Silca could do it effectively at scale it would make sense for them to sell chains that they already did it for.

Definitely a business opportunity to completely eliminate the time/chemicals arguments completely.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:00 AM
benb benb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eastern MA
Posts: 9,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by .RJ View Post
ok boomer
Off by basically 2 generations, but thanks for being offensive to all the older members.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:08 AM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
Yes totally. If this is so great, and I'm sure Shimano/SRAM/Campy have pretty serious testing, why are they not pre-selling chains setup this way?

They could even do it both ways for people who don't want to pay the upcharge.

And if Silca could do it effectively at scale it would make sense for them to sell chains that they already did it for.

Definitely a business opportunity to completely eliminate the time/chemicals arguments completely.
Silca does sell new chains that it has stripped and waxed.
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:09 AM
.RJ .RJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NoVa
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
Off by basically 2 generations, but thanks for being offensive to all the older members.
has nothing to do with age
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:13 AM
fourflys's Avatar
fourflys fourflys is offline
Back At It!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 7,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
Yes totally. If this is so great, and I'm sure Shimano/SRAM/Campy have pretty serious testing, why are they not pre-selling chains setup this way?
my guess is because they don't need to, market-wise, and the set-up to make this happen would be quite expensive.. I'm not going to debate if I should or shouldn't wax my chain, but my feeling is the number of riders who do take the time is extremely small in the grand scheme of cyclists.. and unless Shimano/SRAM/KMC can come out a with a pre-waxed chain that's only a few dollars more, they would never sell enough to make it worth the production costs..

Also, Silca sells a pre-waxed chain if you are looking for that..
https://silca.cc/collections/chain-l...xed-race-chain
__________________
Be the Reason Others Succeed
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:16 AM
fredd fredd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post

A bottle of this + a bag of the Silca chain lube costs almost as much as a top end chain too.
Cheap waxed chain > top of the line chain that never got factory grease flushed

Faster, cleaner, longer lasting.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:19 AM
fredd fredd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourflys View Post
my guess is because they don't need to, market-wise, and the set-up to make this happen would be quite expensive.. I'm not going to debate if I should or shouldn't wax my chain, but my feeling is the number of riders who do take the time is extremely small in the grand scheme of cyclists.. and unless Shimano/SRAM/KMC can come out a with a pre-waxed chain that's only a few dollars more, they would never sell enough to make it worth the production costs..
This is an interesting proposition to be honest. If the biggest hassle with waxed chains is the factory grease, manufacturers are the players positioned to never apply factory grease in the first place and wax the chains instead.

Still probably not realistic as they'd need entirely new tooling and processes in factories they don't own, only to meet a very small fraction of the market. But interesting nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:23 AM
tomato coupe tomato coupe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregL View Post
Agree 100% on both assertions. Since I started waxing chains, I spend less time on bike maintenance. The wax lasts longer than my previous lubes AND the bike stays far cleaner. I find this especially noticeable on my gravel bike, after a muddy or dusty ride. It cleans up so much faster because chain lube hasn't been dispersed all over the back half of the bike. Post-ride bike cleaning takes 1/3 the time it previously required.

Greg
Maybe you were using too much chain lube? If I clean my gravel bike after a muddy or dusty ride, it's to clean off the mud and dust, not chain lube that has been "dispersed over the back half of the bike."
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:30 AM
BRad704's Avatar
BRad704 BRad704 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredd View Post
This is an interesting proposition to be honest. If the biggest hassle with waxed chains is the factory grease, manufacturers are the players positioned to never apply factory grease in the first place and wax the chains instead.

Still probably not realistic as they'd need entirely new tooling and processes in factories they don't own, only to meet a very small fraction of the market. But interesting nonetheless.
I've always thought of the factory coating as more of a long-term rust inhibitor than an actual lubricating grease. Chains are something that's going to sit on a shelf or in a LBS drawer for years (maybe) and still needs to look brand new coming out of the package.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:33 AM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRad704 View Post
I've always thought of the factory coating as more of a long-term rust inhibitor than an actual lubricating grease.
That's exactly what it's meant to be. If that stuff was such great chain lube, why wouldn't the chain manufacturers sell it aftermarket? If it was so great, they'd be able to sell oodles of it.
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-02-2023, 11:37 AM
fourflys's Avatar
fourflys fourflys is offline
Back At It!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 7,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomato coupe View Post
Maybe you were using too much chain lube? If I clean my gravel bike after a muddy or dusty ride, it's to clean off the mud and dust, not chain lube that has been "dispersed over the back half of the bike."
I would agree.. as a more inexperienced cyclist, I know I was using way too much lube back in the day.. I didn't understand the idea that the lube was for the inside of the chain (rollers, pins, etc) and NOT for where the chain meets the teeth..

#themoreyouknow (insert theme music)
__________________
Be the Reason Others Succeed
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-02-2023, 01:23 PM
GregL GregL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Posts: 3,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomato coupe View Post
Maybe you were using too much chain lube? If I clean my gravel bike after a muddy or dusty ride, it's to clean off the mud and dust, not chain lube that has been "dispersed over the back half of the bike."
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourflys View Post
I would agree.. as a more inexperienced cyclist, I know I was using way too much lube back in the day.. I didn't understand the idea that the lube was for the inside of the chain (rollers, pins, etc) and NOT for where the chain meets the teeth..
Appreciate the suggestions, but no, the mess isn't from too much lube on the chain. Prior to waxing, I only lubed the appropriate parts of the chain (pins/rollers) and wiped off excess lube prior to riding. During wet rides, every part the chain touched (chainrings, cogs, derailleur pulleys) would get some small amount chain lube washed on to them. That in turn would get onto the rear wheel, derailleurs, and frame. Since I switched to chain wax, I find all drivetrain components stay much cleaner and wash off easier after a muddy or dusty ride. Chain wax is a win-win for me. Longer lubrication intervals, easier cleanup, and (if you believe the hype) maybe a bit less friction. The latter is immaterial to me.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-02-2023, 01:37 PM
lavi's Avatar
lavi lavi is offline
Deconditioned!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: pdx
Posts: 3,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by benb View Post
This whole wax thing just boggles me. How does anyone actually have the time and money to want to deal with this to save 5w or whatever they claim?
For me, waxxing has zero to do with performance.

The only reason I'm interested is that with cassettes now costing ~$200, I want them to last as long as possible. Waxing allegedly extends drivetrain life by 3-4-5x. That's cool with me.

@JoshSilca, THANK YOU for posting. Welcome to the jungle here of naysayers and constant pissing and moaning. Most here would likely protest being handed a glass of water in hell if the ice were missing on not the proper type (everyone knows that "hosiptal ice" is best and saves watts).
__________________
Peg Mxxxxxo e Duende|Argo RM3|Hampsten|Crux

Last edited by lavi; 06-02-2023 at 01:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-02-2023, 01:55 PM
NHAero NHAero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,589
Guys, if you don't want to wax chains or use Silca products, that's fine!!! It's your bike, do it your way! Sheesh.

Cleanliness and component lifetime are my reasons. And if there is an easy one step new chain prep product that works, it got even easier.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.