|
|
|
|
#76
12-09-2021, 07:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#77
12-09-2021, 07:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
nothing fake on that one.
|
|
#78
12-09-2021, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wish Fuji would do a Monochrom version of the x100… I typically have my XPro2 set to run the electronic viewfinder preview and write jpgs in their Acros B&W film simulation along with the raw files.
I haven’t used any of the current Canon stuff but I can’t imagine you’d be disappointed with an R6 or an X-T4. My advice… find a camera shop that has them, get them in your hands and see how they feel.
|
|
#79
12-09-2021, 08:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Somewhat tangential, but for a hobbyist photographer is there a consensus for best photo editing software with the least steep learning curve?
Coming from the film world, where I used to sell landscape shots to calendar companies, it was more about careful composition and settings prior to shooting rather than darkroom process, since I was selling Ektachrome slides to the vendors.
|
|
#80
12-09-2021, 08:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
It's not a new bike, it's another bike.
|
|
#82
12-09-2021, 09:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And will also say that Ricoh GR is hands down my favorite camera to use ever. I also have an Olympus Pen F with a few nice lenses for lower light and fast moving kids, but even if I shot 50/50 between that and the Ricoh, the GR would probably win75% of my better shots.
|
|
#83
12-09-2021, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm riding to promote awareness of my riding
|
|
#84
12-10-2021, 04:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C.
|
|
#85
12-10-2021, 05:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C.
|
|
#86
12-10-2021, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#87
12-10-2021, 07:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#88
12-10-2021, 09:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's still faking it to make B&W in digital after the fact just cause the camera has already thrown out a lot of information.
B&W Film or a pure monochrome camera capture everything they can at every mm of the film or every pixel on the sensor. A Bayer filter sensor has thrown out a very large amount of what comes into the camera to generate its idea of color and there is nothing that can ever bring that information back because the filter threw it out. The Foveon sensor was so interesting because it worked differently. (I've never seen a Foveon camera though.) More types of cameras that are actually fundamentally different is much more interesting than everything being the same IMO. I would much rather actually have an IR camera instead of faking it with a filter in software too... all this stuff is just more interesting and more in the spirit of photography. We could easily end up in a world where every single camera in the world has a Sony sensor of a similar design. How boring would that be.
|
|
#89
12-10-2021, 09:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not boring at all. Boring to me would be walking around with an expensive system that only results in greyscale data.
I consider digital photography collecting data. The more, the better in every click, then I take that data and make prints from them by using my digital darkroom at home. If Sony made the best sensor that also enabled an easy method of shooting (lightweight, functional gear), then, fine. Just give me that sensor with good glass, and I'll take care of the rest.
__________________
It's not a new bike, it's another bike.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
