#16
|
|||
|
|||
That whippy Vitus he rode is probably worth at least 3-4 more grand tours if he rode a bike that actually transferred his massive Watts to pavement.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
King Kelly is arguably the second or third greatest rider of all time.
Sagan probably doesn't crack the top 25.
__________________
©2004 The Elefantino Corp. All rights reserved. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Preach!
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
OK, so I looked up ProCyclingStats and he's listed 21st all time.
The point is, there are light years between Sagan (who I like, BTW), and Kelly. Sagan's English is easier to understand, though.
__________________
©2004 The Elefantino Corp. All rights reserved. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that Sagan is no Kelly. My only point is that there appear to be parallels in their talents. Sagan is Sagan and that’s all. He is his own thing, but interesting to many cycling fans.
I like him. I won’t be surprised if he’s done with cycling in a couple years. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
He is never going to compete in a grand tour though. Jeff |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
switch teams Pete
Ineos nee Sky can make anyone a GC contender
most money best doctors and lawyers Wiggo-track to GC Froome—no talent to geeky freak with “asthma” Thomas—stout Welshman need I say more? |
|
|