Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:14 AM
Rada Rada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
And pre-steroids Barry Bonds was still the best position player and hitter in the game.

His pre-1998 stats, when he says he started hitting the juice, were still good enough for the 10th best OPS of all time. So if you strip out his greatest years during the height of the steroid era, he was still one of the 10 best offensive players ever.

There's a reason the Giants gave him pretty much all the money to leave Pittsburgh.
Using that logic Pete should be in. Pete never cheated on the field, as Bonds did, but as a manager. On the field Pete had more hits that anyone in MLB history. Personally I don't think any of those guys should ever get in, including Pete, and I am a life long Reds fan who saw Pete play at Crosley Field.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:17 AM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rada View Post
Using that logic Pete should be in. Pete never cheated on the field, as Bonds did, but as a manager. On the field Pete had more hits that anyone in MLB history. Personally I don't think any of those guys should ever get in, including Pete, and I am a life long Reds fan who saw Pete play at Crosley Field.
He broke the one cardinal rule baseball has had for decades: Don't bet on the game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:32 AM
Rada Rada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
He broke the one cardinal rule baseball has had for decades: Don't bet on the game.
I get that and why I said he should never get in. Bonds and the rest cheated for years on the field in an era that was corrupt from the top down and why I don't think they should ever get into the HOF. Now with these new scandals and the slap on the wrist punishments handed down the integrity of the game itself is completely dead, at least to me. I don't think I will ever watch a game again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:40 AM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rada View Post
I get that and why I said he should never get in. Bonds and the rest cheated for years on the field in an era that was corrupt from the top down and why I don't think they should ever get into the HOF. Now with these new scandals and the slap on the wrist punishments handed down the integrity of the game itself is completely dead, at least to me. I don't think I will ever watch a game again.
Eh, with Bonds and Clemens, they made sure fire Hall of Famers all the more Hall of Famer-y.

The line gets blurrier with guys like McGwire and Sosa and Palmeiro and the like. I don't think they compile the stats needed to get there without the help.

I get that's where things get sticky, but Bonds and Clemens? Totes should be in.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-07-2020, 11:53 AM
Rada Rada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
Eh, with Bonds and Clemens, they made sure fire Hall of Famers all the more Hall of Famer-y.

The line gets blurrier with guys like McGwire and Sosa and Palmeiro and the like. I don't think they compile the stats needed to get there without the help.

I get that's where things get sticky, but Bonds and Clemens? Totes should be in.
I get that is the line many people take, erase the juiced seasons and they still put up the numbers. To me the bottom line is they cheated. Multiple seasons. Period.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2020, 07:13 AM
fiamme red's Avatar
fiamme red fiamme red is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,436
It was all the fault of the video replay guy!

https://nypost.com/2020/04/22/red-so...red-to-astros/
__________________
It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi.
--Peter Schickele

Last edited by fiamme red; 04-23-2020 at 07:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2020, 08:57 AM
wc1934 wc1934 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 3,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiamme red View Post
It was all the fault of the video replay guy!

https://nypost.com/2020/04/22/red-so...red-to-astros/
Cora was exonerated regarding the Sox, but not so re: Houston. Thus, we wont ever again see him in a Sox uniform.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-23-2020, 01:15 PM
T-Crush's Avatar
T-Crush T-Crush is offline
Are you thinking....
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 657
Did it change the game?

As far as the Astros and the 2017 WS, here is an interesting observation -

From an article about Clayton Kershaw in Axios Sports –

Perhaps no team has lost as much (from the Astros cheating scandal) as the Dodgers, and perhaps no Dodger was damaged as much as Kershaw. He is a first-ballot Hall of Famer, a three-time Cy Young Award winner, a once-in-a-generation talent, and he will also be remembered for bad luck and bad outings in the playoffs. The biggest of those failures -- there's a compilation video online that has about 100,000 views -- was against the Astros in Game 5 of the 2017 World Series. Sports Illustrated's Tom Verducci found a single statistic that tells the story of that game better than any commissioner's investigation. Clayton Kershaw is known for his devastating curveball, and an equally weaponized slider, and he threw 51 breaking pitches to the Astros that night and they swung and missed at exactly zero.


Picking signs the old fashioned way is a tradition in baseball, and if you get caught, you get a 90+ mph heater in the ribs. Also a tradition. Using the replay camera/monitor is out of bounds. Vacate the title, and take the overs on how many Astros get plunked (assuming we ever get back to baseball).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-07-2020, 08:50 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
You think these two guys aren't in the Hall just due to steroids? Noted pricks. Having said that, they were both HOFers before flaxseed oil, etc.. They should be in.
Pricks that doped..along with McGuire, Sosa and others..disagree, they are cheaters on the same scale as Rose..HOW could they be in the HOF as demonstrated cheaters? Scumbags..big thumb's down.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2020, 07:21 PM
cgolvin's Avatar
cgolvin cgolvin is offline
#RYFB
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Boss Basin
Posts: 5,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattTuck View Post
well, the Red Sox have traded away Mookie Betts (assuming it goes through), ushering in another 86 year drought in Boston championships.

It was a good run for a few years there.
I'm not implying he will be on par with Betts (few are), but I think you will enjoy watching Verdugo play. Check out some defensive highlights from last year -- his arm is elite (some teams wanted to sign him as a pitcher).

That is, unless you Boston fans eat him alive.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-23-2020, 07:15 AM
soulspinner soulspinner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: rochester, ny
Posts: 9,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by saab2000 View Post
when people start getting year-long bans, or longer, it’ll change.
this
__________________
chasing waddy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-09-2020, 10:39 AM
madsciencenow's Avatar
madsciencenow madsciencenow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N. Chicago area.
Posts: 4,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceOdyssey View Post
Connect the dots



Houston followed by Red Sox = Alex Cora


Hate to admit it but I think you are right.

This said, I wonder if everyone isn’t doing this and these two teams are the easiest targets? The reason I say this is that when you look into how they were doing this it seems so easy that you’d have to try not to do this (corporate world calls this a firewall). In addition, the last year or two has seen an increase in hitting numbers. People have speculated that MLB is juicing the ball but how exactly would they do this? I mean how’s a pitcher not going to notice? MLB has admitted they changed the stitching which resulted in a decrease in seam size but I don’t believe this alone explains better hitting numbers.

A couple other thoughts. Does this impact what a team might be willing to offer for Betts? He’s a great fielder but most teams are likely interested in his bat. If his numbers are partially a result of cheating then what will his productivity look like going forward? This said, he was good before Cora arrived but I still wonder.

One other thing I wondered about is if teams are routinely stealing signs, doesn’t this favor pitchers who work rapidly on the mound or are hitters able to get the signal regardless of how fast a pitcher tries to work?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kirk MRB, Alliance G-road, & Top Fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-09-2020, 10:49 AM
72gmc 72gmc is offline
what's a little rust?
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the home of the Huskies
Posts: 5,093
I'd guess people have been doing this since signs were invented.

And while I tend to agree with you, Saab, I'm not sure one- or two-year bans are going to change things that much. MLB let the Barry Bonds fiasco go on until they'd made a pile of money off of him, these investigations are happening after lucrative World Series runs ... maybe I have leftover cynicism from the Bud Selig years but I feel the Lance comparison is apt: get away with it until the business is satisfied, then become an example.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-09-2020, 11:08 AM
MattTuck's Avatar
MattTuck MattTuck is offline
Classics Fan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grantham, NH
Posts: 12,265
It is probably blasphemy, but why not give the pitcher and catcher a little ear piece like the QB gets in football.

Have the pitches come in from the coach, and allow the pitcher or catcher to shake them off. Combine this with a faster pitch clock, and maybe the game would speed up a bit.
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-09-2020, 11:17 AM
VTCaraco VTCaraco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattTuck View Post
It is probably blasphemy, but why not give the pitcher and catcher a little ear piece like the QB gets in football.
That's one of the proposed adaptations, but pitchers found the earbud to be distracting. I've read a few recent pieces about exploring a solution for this, but it will be interesting to see how the game changes...

The other related evolution being discussed is electronic ball/strike calls. My son shared a stat with me yesterday that over 34,000 ball/strike calls were erroneous in 2018. By my calculation, that's just under 5% error or about 15 missed ball/strikes per game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.