#16
|
|||
|
|||
Given the state of the industry, especially in the US, I would state the opposite. Prices for bikes, parts and accessories are probably too low
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
There are so many different bike brands on the market, and so many different outlets to buy them, it is hard to believe that bikes are overpriced. If there were a cheaper way to make a bike with a particular feature set (and at a particular production volume), surely someone would do it in order to take a larger portion of market volume.
Well, at least that should be the case for most bikes on the market. But the bikes that are being discussed here are really high-end specialty niche products. The law of supply and demand and its affect on pricings starts to break down in the specialty market. But this basic axiom still holds true: A product is worth as much as people are willing to pay for it. If people are buying these high-end niche products, then they must be priced right. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
There are overpriced bikes IMHO. I think that manufacturers need high end bikes and discounting them too much will kill their perceived quality. The halo bikes. In the minds of buyers there has now been established a price range for the best of the best. If a maker offers their best at 40% less than the others then people will think that it is not as good as the more expensive offerings. This is a buyers psychology issue not a supply demand issue. How do you sell the idea that you best bike is as good as the others in every way yet costs so much less? DO you come out and say that you have lowered your 1000% margin to 500%? Buyers have been long convinced that the tech in the high end bikes is so advanced that it has to cost that much. This is my speculation and not a claim of fact.
__________________
Cheers...Daryl Life is too important to be taken seriously |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
To get more back on the topic, another thing with the bike industry is that it doesn't seem as economically efficient as autos. The percentage difference between what it costs to build a bike part (or even complete bike) at a factory versus what it sells for at a shop is a lot different than what it costs to make a car at the factory and what it sells for at a shop. I know there are variations in vehicles at different levels in terms of profit margins, but I'm talking on an overall basis. Another thing with bikes is that since the overall dollar amount is lower than cars, it's mentally easier to just pay more for the "best" (DA over Ultegra) than it is with a car. Granted, you're still paying twice the price for something that works basically the same, but it's easier to do that when the dollar figure is lower and you're buying something that's a passion. The price difference between a base Camry and one with some nicer options covers a pretty nice bike. Now I'll get back to the work that affords me the ability to have some nice bikes. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
These banal justifications and half-witted rationales from crass capitalists justifying their excessive luxury purchases reminds me of hyenas on the savannah. Gathered as the scavengers they are, tearing at the carcass of a dead antelope brought down by some nobler beast, eating that which they have not earned while laughing all the while.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The economics and psychology of purchasing niche bike stuff is one thing to consider, the reality in the trenches is another
The originator of the bike product is doing ok and the buyer of the product is getting a fair deal. The guy selling it to you is getting squeezed, the value to the consumer comes out of their end. The halo and niche stuff margins are particularly bad. Interesting times |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Dura ace stomach on a 105 budget
Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Pivot doesn't sell direct to customer;
https://www.pivotcycles.com/en/dealers What percentage of the sale price of a $10K bike is the bike itself?
__________________
Old'n'Slow |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Disclaimer: I played the Porsche and Ferrari flip game for a few years - eventually it got to be a pretty big headache, but below is a high-level overview of how it works.
Quote:
Best way to stay on the list is to not take every allocation, which drives more business for the dealer. To get into the allocation game, it just takes knowing people more than an established history. I got my roommate in college into the Porsche game after he graduated Law School. He started with a GT4 at MSRP, and went from there. Quote:
A Porsche dealer can lose their franchise for selling a new car for more than MSRP. Lots of people (myself included) have received an allocation for a new "halo" (read GT/Speedster etc), and never taken physical delivery. Just titled it and immediately sold it back to the dealer for our cash cost + some return. At this point it's "Pre-Owned," and can be sold for whatever the market dictates. Ferrari works the same way. Go into a Ferrari dealer and try to buy a new one - most won't sell you one, because there's more margin in them selling to an existing customer to drive it for a year (and 1500 miles or so), and then sell it back to the dealer, who can turnaround and sell it for over sticker. If you want a new Ferrari, you buy a used one, and then buy the next model (or the one after that, depending on your dealer) new. If you're willing to take the "risk" you can sell on your own, but often, dealers will stop putting you at the top of their allocation list if you don't throw them a bone when you sell the car. That's why/how I got out of the Ferrari game, I simply wasn't invited back when I sold my Scud with delivery miles on it. (And yes, I regret not driving it, but I didn't buy it as a car, I bought it as a rolling bank account) I'm not sure I entirely agree with that, in general, absolutely, specialist stuff, not so much. Go into your local Specialized dealer and try to get a new Shiv TT...they made 250 for the global non-team market for 2020. The only way you're getting one is if you have an existing relationship with the shop AND the rep. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Mikej; 02-27-2020 at 12:01 PM. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
the whole sleight of hand thing via ten grand bikes vs the 100 thousand buck Ducatti thing is flat out silly...I mean, be serious... and I have no idea via the new mountain bike/gravel stuff and whatever that involves....but via road stuff...when tiagra loaded bikes go for 2 grand or so new, you know that there is a big problem with these things...
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Riding bikes generally requires leisure time, and jobs that grant leisure time tend to be at the higher end of the pay scale. These high paying jobs have increased in pay in the past 10 years while most other lower-paying jobs remain stagnant. Bike companies are designing bikes for what their customers can afford. With increased revenues they can also now pay their staff more. Trickle down at work!
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My concept of a halo bike when I wrote that was just the highest end stuff versus something super limited production from one of the big boys priced at a premium over the standard version of basically the same thing. There are always people willing to pay a premium for exclusivity of pretty much anything and sometimes they need help rationalizing. |
|
|