Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:16 PM
2oldTi 2oldTi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: New York City
Posts: 32
drivetrain advice needed

as above....the specifics are:
70 years old, lifelong rider still rides 100-150 miles/week
Current setup is Shimano Octalink triple (?6503) with 11-28 9 speed cluster and Ultegra rear mech with long cage. This is tolerable, but it would be great to have one more lower gear.
so....

30 or 32 tooth on the rear or 30 tooth chainring (if that exists and is obtainable) or new mini (48-32) crankset and 30 or 32 tooth on the rear? What is your recommendation for obtaining a slightly lower ratio?

(If it matters, the bike is an early Calfee (Italian bottom bracket, minimal chainstay clearance.)

Thank you for your wisdom.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:25 PM
deluz deluz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Encinitas, CA
Posts: 1,669
Don't you already have a 30T chainring on the triple?
Are you looking to change out the whole drive train?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:30 PM
AngryScientist's Avatar
AngryScientist AngryScientist is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northeast NJ
Posts: 33,137
Swap to one of the many available now subcompact doubles in the front for 46/30 in the front and get one of the many available 11-34 9 speed rear cassette. Easy peesey. Doubt you’ll miss the bigger chainring at all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:32 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,054
my 6503 crankset came with 52-42-30 rings. I have been sitting on an American Classic 9 speed cassette that has a 28 cog but I have been satisfied with Ultegra 12-27 so far. I think you could change to a 9 speed rear derailer and use a cassette with 32 or 34 cog and keep the rest of your group as is.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:35 PM
batman1425 batman1425 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryScientist View Post
Swap to one of the many available now subcompact doubles in the front for 46/30 in the front and get one of the many available 11-34 9 speed rear cassette. Easy peesey. Doubt you’ll miss the bigger chainring at all.
^^^ This

Honestly this in any speed (9, 10, 11 or 12) is IMO what pretty much everything other than a no compromises crit bike should be sold stock with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:36 PM
cp43 cp43 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
my 6503 crankset came with 52-42-30 rings. I have been sitting on an American Classic 9 speed cassette that has a 28 cog but I have been satisfied with Ultegra 12-27 so far. I think you could change to a 9 speed rear derailer and use a cassette with 32 or 34 cog and keep the rest of your group as is.

I have done this on one of my bikes. In the 9-speed era Shimano MTB and road rear derailleurs had the same pull ratio. You can get a nice big cassette, and a MTB RD, and keep the cranks.

You can also get a smaller small ring, I think down to 24 teeth. I have gone from the 30 small ring to a 26 on that same bike, and I really like having the really low gears sometimes.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:39 PM
donevwil's Avatar
donevwil donevwil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 4,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by cp43 View Post
I have done this on one of my bikes. In the 9-speed era Shimano MTB and road rear derailleurs had the same pull ratio. You can get a nice big cassette, and a MTB RD, and keep the cranks.

You can also get a smaller small ring, I think down to 24 teeth. I have gone from the 30 small ring to a 26 on that same bike, and I really like having the really low gears sometimes.

Chris
This is the simplest path and has been the go to since 9 spd was new, just make sure you get a long cage not medium cage.

Last edited by donevwil; 07-01-2022 at 02:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2022, 02:47 PM
fried bake fried bake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by batman1425 View Post
^^^ This

Honestly this in any speed (9, 10, 11 or 12) is IMO what pretty much everything other than a no compromises crit bike should be sold stock with.

Agreed!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2022, 03:03 PM
palincss palincss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 5,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by cp43 View Post
I have done this on one of my bikes. In the 9-speed era Shimano MTB and road rear derailleurs had the same pull ratio. You can get a nice big cassette, and a MTB RD, and keep the cranks.

You can also get a smaller small ring, I think down to 24 teeth. I have gone from the 30 small ring to a 26 on that same bike, and I really like having the really low gears sometimes.

Chris
Put that nice 9 speed MTB rear derailleur on there and you can use a Shimano 9 speed 12-36 cassette. If your big ring x 12 is too high a gear, you can replace the 1st position 12 with a 1st position 13 and make a custom 13-36 cassette.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2022, 03:27 PM
buddybikes buddybikes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 4,035
11-32 https://www.amazon.com/Shimano-HG400...a-569992532131

new chain with 2 more links added and be done. Cheap try, then go to something more nuclear
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-01-2022, 04:19 PM
Peter P. Peter P. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Meriden CT
Posts: 7,234
Wide spaced double cranks SUCK. The change between the two chainrings is drastic. I'd rather have a triple any day.

I'd try to find an older, 9 speed triple ATB crank such as a 22-32-44 or 24-34-46. Put a 28-34T large tooth cassette on there, whatever you prefer. That should be plenty low enough.

A cheaper alternative would be to just buy the largest 9 speed cassette you can find. The rest of your drivetrain would not need to be touched, but replace the chain to avoid any skipping issues between the old chain and new cassette.

Since your current drivetrain clears the chainstay, changing to even smaller chainrings should not cause any clearance issues.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-01-2022, 04:33 PM
rice rocket's Avatar
rice rocket rice rocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter P. View Post
Wide spaced double cranks SUCK. The change between the two chainrings is drastic.
Meanwhile, nobody buys anything BUT compact/mid-compact cranks nowadays...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-01-2022, 04:41 PM
Louis Louis is offline
Boeuf Chaîne
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 25,464
Rear 9-spd cassette with 32 or 34 T big cog - works very well for me with my Octalink triple front and long-cage R-der.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-01-2022, 09:15 PM
Ralph Ralph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 6,321
As above said....Put a 26 or 28 tooth small ring on crank. It's a 74 BCD ring, and any BCD ring 74 will fit. Check E Bay. TA makes a nice one.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-01-2022, 09:51 PM
charliedid's Avatar
charliedid charliedid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,938
I'd go for one of the new Madones.

Problem solved, you are welcome.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.