ENVE 5.6 Experience?

[earlfoss]

I'm getting a new-gen Trek Madone and need to get a new wheelset for it. I'm planing to use this for crits and some road races, so I'm not interested in getting the AR rims. I have the AR4.5 for my RoadMachine and they're great, but not good for hard cornering in a race situation.

I'm going back and forth on whether to get the 3.4 or the 5.6. I'm interested in the 5.6 but fear that the rear might be heavy enough to be a liability in races in situations where accelerations on hills are called for. Reviews are sparse, but one mentioned that they take a little effort to wind up. I had some Bontrager Aeolus 5 TLR, raced on them for 2 years and they were excellent deeper profile wheels so maybe I'm overthinking this.

The 3.4 are great, but not quite as aero. I understand they'd make an excellent all around set, but yeah, I'm having a hard time deciding.

Does anyone here have any experiences with their 5.6 wheelset they'd be willing to share?

Thanks!

[kramnnim]

have used 3.4s and 6.7s a lot and honestly can't tell a difference other then when there are big crosswinds

[KarlC]

I would have a HARD look at the Bontrager Aeolus XXX6 wheels, ask around you will not be sorry.

.

[Spdntrxi]

there should be only a difference of 20g between your 4.5AR rear and a 5.6disc rear.. I doubt you notice. I have both and would race both. Tire choice would be the important factor and 4.5AR cant run every tire and you are limited to 28mm and up.

[echappist]

the difference is 100 grams (btwn the 5.6 and the 3.4). The attributable difference due to that 100 grams per se, on a 8% climb is ~0.02 kph; one would need to apply ~0.5 watt more to keep pace. Were that climb to go on for two miles, one would be slower by 0.6 seconds.

absolutely minuscule weight increase for a 20 mm increase in wheel depth

I can understand about worrying about a pound of difference in wheel mass. 100 grams is nothing

Not to mention, no race close to Madison averages 8% for two miles...

[Velocipede]

To the OP, mismatch pairs can be ordered or built. So if you wanted a 4.5, 5.5, 4.6 or whatever, that can be done. I built a pair of 4.4's for someone with Powertap front and rear hubs.

[uber]

I have had 3.4's, and still ride 6.7's and 4.5's on rim brake bikes. Never loved the 3.4's as I never felt they were giving me the aero benefit of the other wheels. 4.5's are absolutely fine in cross winds, but I don't race and I am sure I dont put demands on wheels as you do. I too am ordering a new Madone and am going with the Bontrager 60mm wheels in tubular. Reviews seem to be very good and I am willing to give them a try. I have no experience with 5.6's, sorry. I have gotten some
good info from customer service at Enve.

[veloduffer]

I just got my new Madone and put on the Aeolus XXX 4, which are as good as my Enve and Campy Bora wheelsets.

You can mix and match depths with them too. I would also ask if your Trek dealer for a discount with the bike purchase.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[oldpotatoe]

Originally Posted by echappist

the difference is 100 grams (btwn the 5.6 and the 3.4). The attributable difference due to that 100 grams per se, on a 8% climb is ~0.02 kph; one would need to apply ~0.5 watt more to keep pace. Were that climb to go on for two miles, one would be slower by 0.6 seconds.

absolutely minuscule weight increase for a 20 mm increase in wheel depth

I can understand about worrying about a pound of difference in wheel mass. 100 grams is nothing

Not to mention, no race close to Madison averages 8% for two miles...

Reality, what a concept but as has been mentioned..crosswinds? A Big Deal with Big rims..

[Mark McM]

Originally Posted by echappist

the difference is 100 grams (btwn the 5.6 and the 3.4). The attributable difference due to that 100 grams per se, on a 8% climb is ~0.02 kph; one would need to apply ~0.5 watt more to keep pace. Were that climb to go on for two miles, one would be slower by 0.6 seconds.

absolutely minuscule weight increase for a 20 mm increase in wheel depth

I can understand about worrying about a pound of difference in wheel mass. 100 grams is nothing

Not to mention, no race close to Madison averages 8% for two miles...

The difference in power is probably less than 0.5 W, because the 5.6 wheels will have lower aerodynamic drag. Depending on the speed and wind angle, the heavier 5.6 wheels might even require less power to climb an 8% grade than the 3.4 wheels.

[Tony]

Originally Posted by KarlC

I would have a HARD look at the Bontrager Aeolus XXX6 wheels, ask around you will not be sorry.

.

I've mounted tires on both the XXX6 and XXX4, excellent workmanship, flawless in comparison to ENVE.

[echappist]

Originally Posted by oldpotatoe

Reality, what a concept but as has been mentioned..crosswinds? A Big Deal with Big rims..

thankfully, I think the modern wheels can deal with crosswinds relatively well

in my more foolish days, I once raced on an old school 404 front with a Stinger 6 rear (the Stinger 6 front was out of service). There wasn't even that much wind, but on a 2-mile long descent that averaged -8%, it was truly frightening when we passed the more exposed sections of the descent.

Originally Posted by Mark McM

The difference in power is probably less than 0.5 W, because the 5.6 wheels will have lower aerodynamic drag. Depending on the speed and wind angle, the heavier 5.6 wheels might even require less power to climb an 8% grade than the 3.4 wheels.

you raise a good point, at least when one is attacking those sections. Those speeds may just be high enough to tip the scale in favor of the 5.6 wheels.

As a cat-3 with better than average w/kg, I was never fast enough on the steep ramps (even while attacking the short, minute-long ones) where the aero benefit would offset 150g of add'l rim mass. Might be different for the OP.

[ltwtsculler91]

Originally Posted by Tony

I've mounted tires on both the XXX6 and XXX4, excellent workmanship, flawless in comparison to ENVE.

I just picked up a set of XXX2s after loving my older Aeolus3s. A buddy has gone to XXX6's after using almost everything else out there and think's they're great even as a bigger guy.

If you're going Madone and liked your Aeolus, why go to Enve?
Of the people I know with both sets of wheels, the folks with the Bontrager ones have been happier overall. Enve has more cache, but more issues, and its not a better product

[duff_duffy]

I regret selling my Bontrager wheels mentioned above, never tried ENVE but second those that liked the Bontragers.

[lavi]

I like Enve over other carbon. My opinion.

I had the 4.5s for a few years along with the older "Edge" tubulars prior to that. I'm on board with what Enve, as a company, does. Great wheels. Zero issues (I'm 6'2", ~190-200).

I have heard folks mention they think the Enves (SES gen) in general are soft or flex under aggressive riding. I never, not once, experienced any brake rub or anything to give me the idea the wheels were flexing. Yes, I raced them too.

These wheels are in the Pro Tour...so there's that. I don't think a pro team would tolerate soft, flex-y wheels.