Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-20-2018, 02:23 PM
54ny77 54ny77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,989
because they came with the bike.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-20-2018, 02:31 PM
fogrider's Avatar
fogrider fogrider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: fogtown
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Given the clear performance weight/aero performance parity of hybrid carbon/alloy rims, as well as their superior braking, I don't understand the apparent snobbery about this rims. Is it because they typically cost less than full carbon rims, and people just assume that price = performance?
I think it's more of a holdover from when they first did this. Then it really didn't save much weight and it came apart. Not sure how well it's going to hold up in the new formulation. I have buddy that broke a spoke and the wheel (rear) went out of true. It had to be rough trued to get home. Last month I broke a spoke on a carbon rim, also on a rear wheel. It barely went out of true. I was able to continue and finish my ride, no problem. I did have to bend my the broken spoke to wrap around another spoke so it didn't hit my frame.


Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-20-2018, 02:33 PM
pasadena pasadena is offline
DELETE ACCNT
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Given the clear performance weight/aero performance parity of hybrid carbon/alloy rims, as well as their superior braking, I don't understand the apparent snobbery about this rims. Is it because they typically cost less than full carbon rims, and people just assume that price = performance?
It's because they are ugly and the two piece design lacks a certain elegance of design.
Superficially, they just don't look as nice. That's probably the largest factor.

Other companies with similar designs don't sell as well either.

I agree, HED makes good stuff
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-20-2018, 03:04 PM
NYCfixie NYCfixie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 10065
Posts: 932
If you are going to add hybrid into this thread, Shimano wheels should be added. The DuraAce and RS80/81/700 hybrid Carbon/Alloy are really hard to beat at their price points. They are damn good clincher wheels.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-20-2018, 05:36 PM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
Why clinchers

Aesthetics: They look great on modern race bikas

Value/High Opportunity Cost: Spending $60/wheelset or 1 hour gluing tires to rims is a waste of my financial resources (and I ain't Carlos Slim, but an hour spent doing something productive is, ya know...)

Resale: The punters aren't trying to buy tubulars. Compare resale between enve clincher with r45 and enve tubular with r45. One is essentially unsaleable

That said, I did win a race once on a flat tubular. Ya, great for me and my retirement fund.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-20-2018, 05:39 PM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCfixie View Post
If you are going to add hybrid into this thread, Shimano wheels should be added. The DuraAce and RS80/81/700 hybrid Carbon/Alloy are really hard to beat at their price points. They are damn good clincher wheels.
Shimano ones are very different from HED's though. The HED's are literally a piece of flimsy plastic that looks easily destroyed and can fill up with water/dirt.. The Shimano ones are very sturdy and structural - at least the one's I've seen.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-20-2018, 06:06 PM
NYCfixie NYCfixie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 10065
Posts: 932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clean39T View Post
Shimano ones are very different from HED's though. The HED's are literally a piece of flimsy plastic that looks easily destroyed and can fill up with water/dirt.. The Shimano ones are very sturdy and structural - at least the one's I've seen.
I rode the RS-81 C24 and C35 for over a year and loved them. Difficult to compare because everything I owned or rode before them was 32 spoke alloy - most recently DT Swiss 350 hubs to DT Swiss R440 rims before the Shimanos wheels. I only got rid of the Shimano wheels because they were not going wide anytime soon so I got a pair of Boyd Altamonts. And, I only recently sold my BNIB "backup set" of RS-81s to a friend of a forum member.

Shimano, Campagnolo, and Fulcrum wheels are amazing but those Shimano Carbon/Alloys do take it up a notch (apologies to Emeril). Lighter weight and great braking.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-21-2018, 09:14 AM
ltwtsculler91 ltwtsculler91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Greenwich / Nashville / Florida
Posts: 1,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clean39T View Post
Shimano ones are very different from HED's though. The HED's are literally a piece of flimsy plastic that looks easily destroyed and can fill up with water/dirt.. The Shimano ones are very sturdy and structural - at least the one's I've seen.
I believe on the Shimano clinchers the carbon is structural and the aluminum brake track is the add on, whereas for HED it is the opposite: an aluminum rim plus a carbon add on
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-21-2018, 09:42 AM
biker72's Avatar
biker72 biker72 is offline
Older Than You
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dallas TX Suburb.
Posts: 2,416
Is there such a thing as a quiet carbon clincher?? I can hear those coming a mile away.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.