Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2017, 02:27 PM
MattTuck's Avatar
MattTuck MattTuck is offline
Classics Fan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grantham, NH
Posts: 12,265
Cyclist Hit & Killed by a Tesla in the UK

I know we discussed Tesla and their autopilot before, so this seemed relevant, if still a tragedy.

Still investigating whether autopilot was engaged.

http://road.cc/content/news/232332-d...lear-if-it-was
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2017, 02:33 PM
Tickdoc's Avatar
Tickdoc Tickdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: TUL
Posts: 5,786
oof. I worry about this with just lane assist.
__________________
♦️♠️
♣️♥️
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2017, 03:47 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Does lane assist have trouble seeing cyclists?

Human drivers certainly seem to have trouble seeing cyclists.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2017, 04:43 PM
marciero marciero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Portland Maine
Posts: 3,108
As always, Tragic. Also disturbing to read the claims/estimates of poor performance classifying objects- 1% of cyclists, 30% of cars- from the Stanford robotics researchers in the linked article. My thinking has always been that self-driving cars will make the roads safer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2017, 04:49 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by marciero View Post
As always, Tragic. Also disturbing to read the claims/estimates of poor performance classifying objects- 1% of cyclists, 30% of cars- from the Stanford robotics researchers in the linked article. My thinking has always been that self-driving cars will make the roads safer. But getting ahead of myself. We dont know if auto-pilot was engaged.
Engineering of the "new" always requires some real world testing to fine tune the parameters of the designs. There's always something there that you can't accurately predict until exposed to actual conditions. This is part of the reason why the large automakers have off-road test facilities. Although lately with many different products it appears that the end users are becoming the beta testers.
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2017, 04:50 PM
tuscanyswe tuscanyswe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobO View Post
Engineering of the "new" always requires some real world testing to fine tune the parameters of the designs. There's always something there that you can't accurately predict until exposed to actual conditions. This is part of the reason why the large automakers have off-road test facilities. Although lately with many different products it appears that the end users are becoming the beta testers.
Hey its only lives
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2017, 04:53 PM
ultraman6970 ultraman6970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22,852
If the idiot was playing or looking at the phone at that minute... of course the driver was going to have problems looking at the road.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
Does lane assist have trouble seeing cyclists?

Human drivers certainly seem to have trouble seeing cyclists.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2017, 04:59 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuscanyswe View Post
Hey its only lives
There's always going to be a failure rate. The objective of engineering and testing is to bring that failure rate within acceptable tolerances, which again, is greater than zero. They question here is, has Tesla narrowed their failure rate acceptably prior to unleashing their product into the wild? If not, the ramifications in terms of liability could be quite extreme.
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:02 PM
zetroc zetroc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 475
I'm not interested in participating in an experiment that could cost me my life without giving my consent.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:19 PM
pasadena pasadena is offline
DELETE ACCNT
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,382
...

Last edited by pasadena; 11-17-2017 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:35 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
Does lane assist have trouble seeing cyclists?

Human drivers certainly seem to have trouble seeing cyclists.
A link in the article: http://road.cc/content/news/230853-s...asses-cyclists

It appears that it will fight the driver trying to give enough room. Wonderful.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:38 PM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
A link in the article: http://road.cc/content/news/230853-s...asses-cyclists

It appears that it will fight the driver trying to give enough room. Wonderful.
The article indicates it is a Tesla problem, rather than universal to all vehicles with lane assist.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:45 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
The article indicates it is a Tesla problem, rather than universal to all vehicles with lane assist.
"A recent review of the BMW G32 640iGT 2017 by Honest John (link is external) reveals that when set to semi-autonomously follow road markings, the car will force drivers to execute close passes of cyclists unless they use their indicator."

Not only Tesla.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:49 PM
shovelhd's Avatar
shovelhd shovelhd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
Posts: 6,379
As I've said all along, I will bet that the logic in these systems will prioritize protecting the occupants at all costs. If comes down to Hal .vs. something in the way, a cyclist is no different than a squirrel, turkey, or possum.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-16-2017, 05:51 PM
Vientomas's Avatar
Vientomas Vientomas is offline
Member?
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 2,160
"Progress" will dictate that cyclists will be categorized as road hazards and will no longer be allowed to utilize roadways. Robotic vehicle trumps (no pun intended) humanoid cyclist. Hope ya'll have a nice MUT system nearby.
__________________
Member? Oh, I member.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.