#1
|
|||
|
|||
Merckx Geometry?
Does anyone have a link to a MXL geometry chart? Competitive cyclist had one but it's been taken down. Thanks
Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If it's the century geometry then wrenchscience.com has a chart
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I saw that but not sure if it's same? Anyone know?
Mike Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Last edited by Big Dan; 11-03-2007 at 06:20 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thats what I'm trying to figure out. I'm looking at one that has st 56 c to c and tt 57 c to c. HT is 15. Is that right?
Mike Quote:
Last edited by mike p; 11-03-2007 at 06:24 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://forums.thepaceline.net/showth...ntury+geometry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks much, big help.
Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
MX Leader geometry is...
Laid back.
(With my mind on my money and my money on my mind...) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
#10
|
|||
|
|||
really you need to measure the things because the eddys as built can be kind of different despite what the charts say.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Very true
Quote:
I also had three of them with a 1cm difference in top tube lengths from frame to frame and the spec chart, but not necessarily the same three frames. Not that there were any problems with the frames, just some different measurements from frame to frame and from than shown on the Colnago spec charts for those models. |
|
|