Oakleys on ebay....

[bostondrunk]

OK.....are they all fake??
There are some vendors with well over 1k in feedback, selling tons of them, most people saying they are genuine.
But how does an ebay seller get such a huge stock of both 'stock', and custom oakleys? Does Oakley sell direct to a lot of vendors?

No relation to seller, but looking at these. He has sold lots of them, so apparently has lots of stock of the same 'custom' model. I even contacted a couple of folks who bought them, and they seem to think they are genuine. Whats the deal??

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=160996166423

[Elefantino]

Originally Posted by bostondrunk

OK.....are they all fake??
There are some vendors with well over 1k in feedback, selling tons of them, most people saying they are genuine.
But how does an ebay seller get such a huge stock of both 'stock', and custom oakleys? Does Oakley sell direct to a lot of vendors?

No relation to seller, but looking at these. He has sold lots of them, so apparently has lots of stock of the same 'custom' model. I even contacted a couple of folks who bought them, and they seem to think they are genuine. Whats the deal??

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=160996166423

The quality of the current crop of Fauxkleys frames actually quite good. It's the lenses where the issues are.

[bostondrunk]

Originally Posted by Elefantino

The quality of the current crop of Fauxkleys frames actually quite good. It's the lenses where the issues are.

Agree. There are some vendors openly selling them as fake for like $30, yet they look damn real. There used to be a few tell tale signs of fakes, but some of them now look really genuine.
The link I posted, those radars have a frame color that isn't even available (even in custom) on either the US or Canada website. And how this vendor can have so many of them, in various lenses....thats a lot different than a bike shop clearing out a little bit of inventory....

The ****ty thing is that I just went to the Canadian Oakley website, and configured a pair of radars. Iridium lens, but not polarized. $265 + shipping plus tax, came to just over $300. Ouch!

[BumbleBeeDave]

. . . like most sports optics.

Unless I'm trying to read microfilm with them while riding, I can't imagine that the Oakley optical quality is superior enough that it makes any material difference for the huge increase in cost.

I know I'll probably get plenty of pushback, but that's how I feel.

BBD

[Llewellyn]

Originally Posted by BumbleBeeDave

. . . like most sports optics.

Unless I'm trying to read microfilm with them while riding, I can't imagine that the Oakley optical quality is superior enough that it makes any material difference for the huge increase in cost.

I know I'll probably get plenty of pushback, but that's how I feel.

BBD

I agree BBD - Oakleys have always seemed ridiculously over-priced for what you get, which to me is a pair of glasses primarily to keep the sun, wind and insects out of my eyes while I'm riding. My $30 Kuota's do the same job quite adequately

More of a fashion statement for the wearer in most cases IMO

[gavingould]

you can usually spot the fake Jawbones by looking for the little foam/rubber pads in the upper channel that help hold the lenses in place, fakes won't have them. the little "O" icons will fall out pretty quickly...
also pretty much all the fake Jawbones will have Livestrong branded ear pads no matter what color they are, as far as i know the real livestrong ear pads were only made in yellow?
i'm no expert, but i did end up with a pair of fauxkleys from a seller on the forum here a year or so ago, we did come to a fair agreement as they're actually not bad sunglasses. i won't be having anyone shoot a bb gun at them to test or anything, but they do work as sunglasses, and fit/finish is pretty good for fake. everyone who sees them thinks they're legit (not that it matters - i like the look and the ease of lens changes)

[bostondrunk]

OK.....my 7 cents....

If you are talking -value-, it is always hard to make an argument for Oakleys. I agree that a $15 pair of glasses from any department store will work.
But I gotta say, I've tried so many brands/models. Giro, RP, Briko, Nike, Specialized, Tifosi, Smith...
None of them have ever compared to Oakley in terms of fit and quality IMHO. Not even close.
Believe me, it kills me to drop 300 on a pair, but if I want to wear what truly feels and fits the best it is Oakley.
I've owned at least 6 or 7 pair (radars, M-frames, Gascan, Sub zeros, scars, etc) and all were great quality. Don't know why, but Oakley somehow produces a better product.

We could all be riding walmart bikes too for the value....

[thirdgenbird]

Originally Posted by bostondrunk

OK.....my 7 cents....

If you are talking -value-, it is always hard to make an argument for Oakleys. I agree that a $15 pair of glasses from any department store will work.
But I gotta say, I've tried so many brands/models. Giro, RP, Briko, Nike, Specialized, Tifosi, Smith...
None of them have ever compared to Oakley in terms of fit and quality IMHO. Not even close.
Believe me, it kills me to drop 300 on a pair, but if I want to wear what truly feels and fits the best it is Oakley.
I've owned at least 6 or 7 pair (radars, M-frames, Gascan, Sub zeros, scars, etc) and all were great quality. Don't know why, but Oakley somehow produces a better product.

We could all be riding walmart bikes too for the value....

X2

My casual Oakleys ($180) have been one of the best purchases I've ever made. They are going on 5 years of nearly daily use. 3 of those summers they spent a lot of time in hay fields working in the dirt and dust underneath equipment. They most certainly saved my eyes.

After 5 years, they have two very small scratches that don't effect performance and the earpieces fell apart but Oakley replaced them 100% free of charge.

The glasses are still going strong but I'm close to buying another pair before they discontinue them on me.

Edit:did I mention they fit great and the lenses work in most lighting conditions?

[thirdgenbird]

After making the post above I went over to oakley and found out they had been discontinued. Lots of searching revealed one vendor that claimed to have one pair (differ color) in stock. I sure hope their inventory is correct...

[oldpotatoe]

Originally Posted by BumbleBeeDave

. . . like most sports optics.

Unless I'm trying to read microfilm with them while riding, I can't imagine that the Oakley optical quality is superior enough that it makes any material difference for the huge increase in cost.

I know I'll probably get plenty of pushback, but that's how I feel.

BBD

$169?? And the OP implies that's some sort of great deal...YGBSM..I'm with ya, not gonna pay $169 for sunglasses.

I'll spend my $169 on 3 tires, thanks.

[bostondrunk]

Originally Posted by oldpotatoe

$169?? And the OP implies that's some sort of great deal...YGBSM..I'm with ya, not gonna pay $169 for sunglasses.

I'll spend my $169 on 3 tires, thanks.

Well, a lot of people would think 169 is a lot for 3 tires is CRAZY when you can buy 3 clincher tires of xxx brand for $75. Or three vittoria Rally tubies for $55. Hey, they'll get the job done. Why on earth would I spend 169 on tires??!!? That's crazy talk!
Oh, and Bumblebeedave, that Serotta you ride.......talk about overpriced items...a few tubes welded together....I could have found you something that would have gotten the job done for less than 1/5th the price.



Next up......isn't Assos clothing great?!

[Mikej]

I love my Oakley transitions and polarized radars. I get a deal, but it seems the more I pay for glasses the longer I have them and the better I take care of them. I would never use anything but radars (cheaper led non polarized) for Mtb they fit awesome.

[GeekBoy]

I have a big head. Finding helmets and sunglasses is a major pain in the rear, and so far Oakley is the only thing that fits well for all day rides, so I'll happily pay the price. I wore glasses for 20 years before getting contact lenses, so I'm good about taking care of them (not dropping, etc.). My 2 year old Jawbones are as good as new.

That being said a friend of mine got a pair of the fake jawbones. Frames looks to be identical (and doesn't have the annoying creak mine has), but lenses are noticeably cheaper. Not 100% sure anymore (it was a while ago), but I think the lenses did fit from one to the other FWIW.

[Fishbike]

So true that there is room to negotiate. I went to an optical shop and priced out a pair of perscription Oakleys. It came to $485! I declined and the shop immediately took $100 off. I bought them and I love the optics but still dismayed by the retail gamesmanship. Of course Oakley is owned by Luxottica, the giant Italian company that owns most eyewear brands and most retail eyewear stores. This near monopoly is why eyeglasses are so expensive.

[beestee]

They look legit. It's hard to tell without actually having them in hand, but these would be really good knockoffs, if they were. And yes, there is a difference--in both lens and frame quality.

Shops I've worked for over the years have sold tons of these, but there's also a lot that didn't sell. We had some pink radars on the shelf for over 2 years. The sticker price can be a bit high, so larger retailers may opt to move new stock in and unload a bunch at below full retail after they've been on the shelf long enough to mark down. Sunglasses displays usually have limited room, so putting current inventory in there is a priority.