Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-13-2023, 08:08 AM
simpsonn simpsonn is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: US
Posts: 127
I've had good luck for several years now using a hybrid setup. I use a Garmin sensor snapped onto a Polar Pro strap (most comfortable strap IMO). It fits without any modifications. After every ride, I take off the Garmin sensor, rinse the Polar strap, and hang to dry.

I'm using an older ANT+ Garmin sensor so I can't speak to if the newer Garmin dual HRM sensor will fit but it looks pretty similar in size.

Last edited by simpsonn; 03-13-2023 at 08:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-13-2023, 08:25 AM
Kyle h Kyle h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,267
This is why I’ve always said HR is a horrible metric for training. The technology is just too inconsistent and variable to provide reliable insight in an endurance sport scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-13-2023, 08:30 AM
madsciencenow's Avatar
madsciencenow madsciencenow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N. Chicago area.
Posts: 4,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle h View Post
This is why I’ve always said HR is a horrible metric for training. The technology is just too inconsistent and variable to provide reliable insight in an endurance sport scenario.
I've never thought that a chest strap was inconsistent. I hear you on the optical sensors but not the chest straps. I see way more variability w/ re to my PMs and the new optical sensors seem like they are getting pretty good (think of my apple watch 7). YMMV.
__________________
Kirk JKS & MRB, Alliance G-road, & Top Fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-13-2023, 09:08 AM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle h View Post
This is why I’ve always said HR is a horrible metric for training. The technology is just too inconsistent and variable to provide reliable insight in an endurance sport scenario.
RPE never lets me down.
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-13-2023, 03:29 PM
Kyle h Kyle h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsciencenow View Post
I've never thought that a chest strap was inconsistent. I hear you on the optical sensors but not the chest straps. I see way more variability w/ re to my PMs and the new optical sensors seem like they are getting pretty good (think of my apple watch 7). YMMV.
Maybe it’s my body build but the only way I ever got chest straps to stay when doing triathlon was to have them so tight it felt like it was limiting chest expansion. Optical sensors bounce around a lot but it is improving. I use optical sensors on patients on a daily basis during PT sessions and still find sensor placement to be finicky.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-13-2023, 04:34 PM
Ozz's Avatar
Ozz Ozz is offline
I need you cool.
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Swellevue, WA
Posts: 7,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle h View Post
Maybe it’s my body build but the only way I ever got chest straps to stay when doing triathlon was to have them so tight it felt like it was limiting chest expansion. .....
Definitely your body build....maybe try one of these!
__________________
2003 CSi / Legend Ti / Seven 622 SLX
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-13-2023, 05:05 PM
Old School Old School is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: West Coast
Posts: 782
My wahoo straps all ended up in the garbage. Fastest and most reliable for me has been Sigma.

Last edited by Old School; 03-13-2023 at 05:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-13-2023, 05:24 PM
Flinch Flinch is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 278
Gotta say after trying many chest straps, with crappy results, that I finally landed on the scosche rhythm+. Flawless so far, and I really like that it straps to my forearm, out of the way, and also tracks cadence (if you want it to).

Funny story re odd hearbeats: In 2018 I had an AFIB event with atrial flutter (age 66), and in the ambulance the tech said my heart rate was 250, (max rate is 157). All I could think about was, "I wonder how fast I could ride uphill at 250 bpm?". Well, I thought it was funny... No AFIB since, by the way. Cardiologist, who was also a exercise physiologist, said the AFIB was probably the result of years of endurance miles.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-13-2023, 06:18 PM
R3awak3n's Avatar
R3awak3n R3awak3n is offline
aka RAEKWON
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC // Catskills, NY
Posts: 14,688
Dude its the new garbage put there.

I had a firs gen wahoo, was amazing and lasted for year and a bazillion miles. It finally broke after basically replacing the strap 3 times. Bought anew gen one, would not connect for 10 plus minutes sometimes, the readings were erratic. So they sent me a new strap, same crap. They eventually sent a arm band one because they said they were having problems with the chest ones (this was a year ago), the arm band one is definitely better but lately I have not been wearing any
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-14-2023, 06:50 AM
Tim Porter Tim Porter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 871
Garmin HRMs have been solid for me, but occasionally one will take a while to connect to the 1030 head unit I use. I've found that they snap back into shape if I use a soft toothbrush and some isopropyl alcohol on the both parts of the snaps on the sensor unit and strap itself. Seems elementary, but it also seems to work . . . . Probably can't hurt to try to make sure there's good contact between the sensor and the strap. HTH, Tim
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-14-2023, 09:03 AM
bigbill bigbill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hackberry, AZ
Posts: 3,762
Second on the Scosche monitor. I've had mine close to ten years after having poor experiences with the Garmin straps. On the trainer, I wear it on my forearm, and since losing a ton of weight, I wear it above my bicep when riding outdoors. I'm on the third or fourth strap, but still using the original rechargeable sensor.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-14-2023, 10:18 AM
R3awak3n's Avatar
R3awak3n R3awak3n is offline
aka RAEKWON
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC // Catskills, NY
Posts: 14,688
come on guys, you know wearing HR monitors on the forearm does not look pro
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-14-2023, 01:10 PM
mjf mjf is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 469
We use Polar h10's in the lab, since they're the gold standard. They're obviously a bit more expensive, but you're paying for the validated accuracy and precision.

For myself, I have a garmin instinct watch, and occasionally use a wahoo chest strap. I've never found either of the above to be far enough out of spec where I'm having any issues or concerns, but YMMV.

That being said, if I were looking for a new watch/HR monitor, I'd probably end up buying an Apple watch. Apple watches have been tested pretty heavily and the level of agreement between the Polar H10, and the HR sensor is the Apple watch is more than enough for me to be confident that the measures that I'm getting are accurate. I'd have to go with the Ultra for the battery life, but there's obviously nothing wrong with the regular models.

https://www.jsr.org/index.php/path/article/view/662 - No significant difference between Polar H10 and Apple Watch
https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/128 - 0.99 Pearson coefficient between Polar H10 and Apple watch, very strong agreement between the two devices.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-14-2023, 02:08 PM
KJMUNC's Avatar
KJMUNC KJMUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,247
another data point: I swapped to a Wahoo about 18mo ago and since then I've had two straps die on me. One was clearly corroded on the inside (although I'd never opened it) and 2nd had similar issues.

both time Wahoo sent me a new one, but was annoying to wait the 2-3 weeks without one, especially for someone with a history of heart issues.

No issues on my 3rd strap, but by comparison, I rode my Garmin strap for at least 10yrs with no issues whatsoever.
__________________
IG: teambikecollector
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-14-2023, 03:10 PM
Sarhog's Avatar
Sarhog Sarhog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 253
I know nothing about chest strap heart monitors, but based on the responses here, I have a question… Does the strap have something to do with proper function? My arm band strap’s only function is to hold the HRM in place.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.