Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-30-2022, 07:40 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
So-called "triple butted" spokes have been around for many years. For example, Sapim Force spokes are similar at 2.18/1.8/2.0, and DT Alpine spokes are even more extreme at 2.34/1.8/2.0. They have been primarily marketed toward tandems and loaded touring. As you note, they can be a tight fit through some flange spoke holes (which are often 2.4mm), and which is why many tandem/touring hubs have slightly larger spoke holes (2.5mm - 2.6mm).
I have built many wheels with Sapim Force spokes but the .2mm fatter just at elbow is new to me. The Pillars are really 'quad butted' tho...2.2mm to 2mm to 1.8mm back to 2mm...
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-30-2022, 08:12 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
I have built many wheels with Sapim Force spokes but the .2mm fatter just at elbow is new to me. The Pillars are really 'quad butted' tho...2.2mm to 2mm to 1.8mm back to 2mm...
Yeah, that is a bit odd. Pillar calls these spokes "PSR triple butted", where the PSR apparently refers to their process to make them thicker only in the elbows. They also have more traditional triple butted spokes, where the entire neck/elbow is 2.2mm, I'm not sure that the advantage of the PSR spokes is.

They also have other spokes they call quadruple butted which which are even more extreme. These are 2.5mm elbows that squeeze down to a 2.3mm neck, then down further to 1.8mm for the long middle section, then back to 2.0mm at the elbows. I can't imagine there are too many applications for these spokes.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-31-2022, 06:26 AM
sleepyfelix sleepyfelix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 97
I've not had this problem with Ekar, but have only been using it on Campy wheels. However I have had a similar problem with Campy 12 sp cassettte (Chorus in this case) sometimes clipping the spokes on some Ritchey Zeta wheels I had. The larger cassette sizes i.e. 30 teeth and above seem to have extra matal tabs on the back which protude inboard. I've heard of some people taking a Dremel to them to remove them as they seem to serve little function and I assume they are part of the manufacturing process.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-13-2023, 04:32 PM
alvinholbrook alvinholbrook is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 25
hate to resurrect this, but has anyone seen if Campagnolo has actually released a bolt update? I would love to run an Industry Nine hub if possible but would still need a lower-profile set of bolts.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2023, 04:50 PM
Peter P. Peter P. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Meriden CT
Posts: 7,232
Are those bolt heads meant to be serviceable i.e., to disassemble the cassette?

If not and they're technically rivets, how about a few strokes with a file to gain clearance? That way, there would be no issues with the small cog/chain/dropout.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-13-2023, 07:59 PM
aaronf aaronf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: atlanta
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by alvinholbrook View Post
hate to resurrect this, but has anyone seen if Campagnolo has actually released a bolt update? I would love to run an Industry Nine hub if possible but would still need a lower-profile set of bolts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter P. View Post
If not and they're technically rivets, how about a few strokes with a file to gain clearance?
If you'd prefer a bit cleaner look than hand filing I'd be happy to help you. No problem to sort on one of my mills or lathes.
And I fully recognize there is no functional difference
pm if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-13-2023, 11:50 PM
carlucci1106's Avatar
carlucci1106 carlucci1106 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Frozen Tundra, Minnesota
Posts: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter P. View Post
Are those bolt heads meant to be serviceable i.e., to disassemble the cassette?

If not and they're technically rivets, how about a few strokes with a file to gain clearance? That way, there would be no issues with the small cog/chain/dropout.
They are removable; we used a titanium H2O cage bolt set with a low-profile head. That got the clearance we needed, and no issues with 100-kilo-ish, powerful rider with high torque/low cadence style. Used a lot of blue loctite on bolt threads and torqued to at least 12Nm.

Filing down wouldn't have worked on our setup. There was at least 1.5mm of overlap (with CX-rays, even). I envisage that there would not be enough meat left for the Torx tool, if we attempted it. Nothing special about the bolts, except they are about 4mm in length vs 10mm for cage bolts (both rough est), so we had to shear the bolts down and chase their threads through a spare braze on. Worth it, ATMO. https://www.amazon.com/Terske-Ultra-...310&th=1&psc=1

Last edited by carlucci1106; 03-13-2023 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.