Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Yesterday, 08:21 AM
djg21 djg21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 5,454
Ray Ban Meta Smart Glasses?

Is anyone using Ray Ban Meta smart glasses as cycling glasses? I’m not a social media person, but these could be an alternative to Cycliq safety cameras, which in my experience have had quality issues with lousy customer support. It could be interesting to have the ability to shoot photos and videos from an eye-level perspective with audible, hands-free commands, and to also have open-ear audio capability to listen to music and receive calls if necessary.

I’ve always used Rudy Project with photochromatic progressive lenses on my bike. I’ve collected a few pair over the years. It’s time for new lenses. Oddly, it costs the same to purchase a new set of RP glasses with lenses as it does to purchase just lenses. I’m thinking the Metas won’t cost much more and they look interesting. I’m thinking this technology is going to find its way into a cycling-specific eyewear soon, but the Ray Bans don’t look bad and aren’t outrageously priced. Any experiences?

https://www.ray-ban.com/usa/ray-ban-meta-smart-glasses

https://youtu.be/WG0AhMoFGyQ

https://youtu.be/spAx64uvI34

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIVRmDDChiA

https://www.wired.com/review/review-...smart-glasses/

Last edited by djg21; Yesterday at 01:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 10:08 AM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,860
Well, those are interesting
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Yesterday, 11:04 AM
NHAero NHAero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,178
Amazing.
__________________
Bingham/B.Jackson/Unicoi/Habanero/Raleigh20/429C/BigDummy/S6
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Yesterday, 11:21 AM
MikeD MikeD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,110
How's the picture quality though? and non-wrap around sunglasses are not as good for cycling.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Yesterday, 12:27 PM
djg21 djg21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 5,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeD View Post
How's the picture quality though? and non-wrap around sunglasses are not as good for cycling.
Watch the YouTube reviews. It looks pretty decent. Maybe not as high resolution as possible with a Go Pro, but the stabilization looks pretty solid.

Last edited by djg21; Yesterday at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Yesterday, 06:14 PM
flying flying is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,211
Like something Q would give James Bond
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Yesterday, 06:22 PM
AngryScientist's Avatar
AngryScientist AngryScientist is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northeast NJ
Posts: 34,021
Wow. Very interesting.

I am also pleasantly shocked when I clicked and looked at the price. Much less expensive than I would have guessed.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Yesterday, 06:32 PM
redir's Avatar
redir redir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,115
I agree with the glasshole part of the article.

What kind of storage does it have? Battery life? would it really work for a cycling dashboard cam? Didn't seem to be prescription friendly either. I would think light responsive lenses would be a must too for cycling. Finally, they are essentially Wayfarers which are classic in design but probably not the best cycling glasses. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Yesterday, 06:48 PM
djg21 djg21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 5,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by redir View Post
I agree with the glasshole part of the article.

What kind of storage does it have? Battery life? would it really work for a cycling dashboard cam? Didn't seem to be prescription friendly either. I would think light responsive lenses would be a must too for cycling. Finally, they are essentially Wayfarers which are classic in design but probably not the best cycling glasses. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer
Specs are here: https://www.ray-ban.com/usa/discover...rt-glasses/clp. Scroll to bottom of the page. If you read the links I provided, you have seen that it’s prescription friendly (even progressives), and available with dark, clear or transitions lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Yesterday, 06:57 PM
mstateglfr's Avatar
mstateglfr mstateglfr is offline
Sunshine
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Des Moines IA
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeD View Post
How's the picture quality though? and non-wrap around sunglasses are not as good for cycling.
Eh, after using cycling wrap around glasses for years, in smaller styles and even obnoxiously large style, I moved away from them during the pandemic and haven't missed em one bit.

$25 gives me Tifosi Swick sunglasses in a bunch of colors and they work perfectly for me on paved roads, grafel, and in the woods. I wear em when driving and then when riding.
They reduce glare, keep stuff out of my eyes, and don't fog up. Basically exactly what I expect glasses to do.
I've used em in countless gravel races and can confidently say the glasses weren't what kept me off the podium.

Its been over 4 years now and I have yet to come across a situation where I am like 'damn, I wish I had some oversized wraparound sunglasses right now!'.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Yesterday, 10:13 PM
vertr vertr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstateglfr View Post
$25 gives me Tifosi Swick sunglasses in a bunch of colors and they work perfectly for me on paved roads, grafel, and in the woods.
Those glasses are quite large lol
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Today, 12:03 AM
54ny77 54ny77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13,261
no thanks.

it's creepy enough that cell phones pick up on convos already.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Today, 09:26 AM
redir's Avatar
redir redir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 7,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by djg21 View Post
Specs are here: https://www.ray-ban.com/usa/discover...rt-glasses/clp. Scroll to bottom of the page. If you read the links I provided, you have seen that it’s prescription friendly (even progressives), and available with dark, clear or transitions lenses.
Well that is quite impressive for what it is. If you ever decide getting them let us know how they work. I've been wanting those Cycliq cameras for a long time now but have heard too many stories as you mentioned about them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Today, 09:54 AM
MikeD MikeD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,110
If you're getting them for audio, they ain't as good as the Bose glasses that were discontinued, and those lacked bass unless you wear earwarmers over them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Today, 11:28 AM
mstateglfr's Avatar
mstateglfr mstateglfr is offline
Sunshine
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Des Moines IA
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by vertr View Post
Those glasses are quite large lol
Are they? They are definitely larger than the smaller style Swank, but I havent viewed Swicks as quite large.
Interesting.


Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.