#61
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Are you okay, maybe take a step back and look at the choices you make and adjust accordingly? No equivalency here, I ride road all the time and don't have any fears or trouble with humans piloting automobiles. I'm not afraid to ride my bike but I'd never get on a rocket ship. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yeah I get it, I don't care either. I do think it's kinda amazing. Actually I thought it was more amazing until I read some of the more intellectual comments in this thread regarding where Nasa states something like 50 nautical miles straight up from sea level as being space and that's as far as these too love birds will get give or take a few more miles. Then the peanut gallery further added on that this has been accomplished by NASA like over sixty years ago. I dunno just what's been stated in previous comments and I'll believe it as there are smarter people than myself here, I think it's still amazing that some filthy rich guys are trying to do it themselves. I just think it's kinda gross in a way that it adversely contributes to global warming and I just wish some would come up with a way to to reverse it's affects, you know something way more amazing from a science fiction novel kinda concept only for real. Just remember Paceline forum= Peanut gallery...so it's OK to disagree |
#63
|
||||
|
||||
I don't have time to go into the wage analyses of CEO versus worker pay over the last 3 decades and it would cause this thread to be shut down so I won't.
In short, while they pay less and less of the fair share their boats keep getting bigger while we who pay more into the fair share, our dwellings keep getting smaller. |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Right. That sickening TV show that CNN put on yesterday was nuts, trying to make this into another [echo] Step Into The Future [echo] thing, with a smiley happy team of joy riders being hailed as innovators or something, when, I was thinking, didn't we do this fifty years ago, and they decided that rockets were a better idea?
__________________
It's not a new bike, it's another bike. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My real point is that if you intellectualize bike riding too much you run the risk of taking the joy completely out of the picture. Choosing where you live and ride is in your hands. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
A little perspective. Red is Earth, blue is Sir Richard and crew, green is space station. This is using 4000 miles as Earth radius.
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
more perspective
Defining "space" in terms of gravity is problematic because the force decreases continuously- no abrupt cutoff. Hence arbitrary definitions.
As stated in the article, no significant difference in gravity at 50 miles. Again using 4000 miles as earth radius 50% gravity at about 1600 miles from earth surface. 10% at about 8600 miles One is never outside the influence of gravity due to any heavenly body, so "zero gravity" does not exist. But you could think of zero gravity as where the gravitational effects of various heavenly bodies cancel each other out. For example, earth and moon would pull equally if you were about 215 thousand miles between earth and moon, assuming moon is about 240,000 miles and radius about 1000 miles. So even at the space station (altitude of 254 miles) the gravity is still about 88% of earth. It just feels like zero gravity because both the space station and occupants are orbiting Last edited by marciero; 07-12-2021 at 08:53 AM. |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
I'd be willing to bet he was referring to the first airlines as we know them today...which would be absolutely true.
Even outside of that flight is and was the hobby of means. The Wright's may have been the first, but from there it quickly became something that one needed a steady supply of cash to be able to buy, maintain, and constantly fuel to use. Certainly not the hobby of the average Jane/John Doe, never was and never will be. IMHO of course. W. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Steinbeck would be preferable. Burroughs would be more fun. And Celine would be more appropriate. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
And, as always, Karl Marx.
__________________
It's not a new bike, it's another bike. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Things that are in orbit are constantly falling towards earth, it's just that they are going so fast, they miss.
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Bet there were plenty of serfs that defended Henry VIII too and never thought to question the divine right of kings. Glad we've made progress, but think we could do better.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Virgin Galactic files to sell $500mm in equity.
Thanks suckers |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Well, they just fall more slowly. Unless energy is added, orbiting objects will eventually fall. The nearer the orbit, the greater the drag they experience, and the sooner they will fall.
|
Tags |
conspicuous consumption, veblen goods |
|
|