#16
|
|||
|
|||
You'll remember the failed QR on the original rather non-standard thru axle, tightened with vice grips.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
photos and info is on the Enve website now. Including tire capacity.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting design, but apparantly it is more than just a rake adjustment. It also changes the fork length and maximum tire clearance. From what I read into the specs, the two options are:
Option 1: 55.5mm offset, 406mm axle to crown, 29x2.3/27.5x2.6 maximum tire clearance. Option 2: 49mm offset, 398mm axle to crown, 29x2.1/27.5x2.4 maximum tire clearance. On a typical bike, a 7mm fork length change will change the head and seat tube angles by almost 1/2 degree, and change the BB drop by about 3mm. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
The flip shift is significant. It makes sense to me. Having Option 1 with more offset, clearance and length (stack) when adventuring with a bigger tire and fork bags sounds about right. Then you have Option 2 for everyday riding.
The clearance is intriguing. Is it 1.5 at the crown race? Quote:
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Nah, tapered steerer.
Mr Varley has a road bike with a tapered steerer coming, but the MCD and Road Plus use 1 1/8” head tubes that are incompatible with this fork. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If a frame had a 73 degree HTA and wore 700x48 tires with the fork in Option 2 configuration (49mm rake, 398mm A-C) then I believe if you switched to Option 1 configuration (55.5mm rake, 406mm A-C) the HTA would then be 72.73 degrees and the front-center increased by about 8mm. Mechanical trail would drop from about 57mm to about 52mm. If the bike was designed with a 72 degree HTA for a fork with Option 2 specs then the change would be about the same if a touch less. But, I am an accountant not an engineer. |
|
|