Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2019, 09:17 PM
tv_vt tv_vt is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Coast of Vermont
Posts: 5,690
Steel forks that look good with 1-1/8" headsets

Occasionally I'll see a steel fork on a frame with a 1-1/8" headtube. Most of the time, they look funny because the headtube and lower headset piece are so much bigger than the top of the steel fork. It's a poor transition in comparison to, say, how an Enve carbon fork looks under a 1-1/8" lower headset - the front to back depth of the Enve fork matches the diameter of the headset very well. With steel forks, the front to back depth is much shorter than the headset width and it looks weird to me.

So, can you point me to certain steel forks that work well visually with 1-1/8" headtubes and headsets? Are there certain crown lugs that work better? BTW this would be for a road frame with caliper brakes.

Just thinking ahead a bit if/when the time comes or need arises when I need to replace my current fork, which is carbon.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2019, 09:24 PM
seanile's Avatar
seanile seanile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,768
Interestingly, I’d personally say the size ratio awkwardness is less of a concern of the head tube, but more of the downtube and the top tube sizes. A skinny front end on a thick mid section looks odd to me.
Older Columbus and Reynolds tubed bikes, like Merckx, looked good because they were smaller 25.4 tubes.
Just my thoughts, though I’ll always recommend a segmented fork if you’re looking for some thickness in the front end that isnt carbon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2019, 09:36 PM
tv_vt tv_vt is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Coast of Vermont
Posts: 5,690
Segmented forks are just too clunky and overbuilt for a road bike (IMO).

It would be cool if there were some very ovalized fork blades and a matching fork crown that had a smooth visual transition with 1-1/8 headtubes. Most of the crowns seem to be designed to work with 1 inch headtubes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:00 PM
Blue Jays Blue Jays is offline
Rock Hard ~ Ride Free
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,398
Tom Kellogg and Jeff Duser of Spectrum Cycles can easily address that question. They love forks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:01 PM
seanile's Avatar
seanile seanile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by tv_vt View Post
Segmented forks are just too clunky and overbuilt for a road bike (IMO).

It would be cool if there were some very ovalized fork blades and a matching fork crown that had a smooth visual transition with 1-1/8 headtubes. Most of the crowns seem to be designed to work with 1 inch headtubes.
Columbus max forks with the samson crowns are good at that intent, but unfortunately built to a 1”. If there were a 1 1/8 version id be on that so quickly..


Sklar has also managed to add a nice touch to his segmented forks by matching the steerer tube extension to the diameter of the head tube: https://www.instagram.com/p/BIYQtIIA...=19uxv9rtbf6p3

Then winter did the best of both worlds with this:
https://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=167179
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2019, 12:09 AM
weisan's Avatar
weisan weisan is offline
ZhugeLiang
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Back in Austin, Texas
Posts: 17,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Jays View Post
Tom Kellogg and Jeff Duser of Spectrum Cycles can easily address that question. They love forks.
oh they do!

I love the fork more than the frame, to be honest.
It's so light, I couldn't believe it when I first pick it up. It makes a world of difference to the ride.




__________________
🏻*

Last edited by weisan; 02-15-2019 at 08:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2019, 12:30 AM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Foothills
Posts: 2,903
It's the top side of any 44mm HT that bothers me. I've yet to see a clean HT-to-stem transition with this spec.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 44ht.jpg (30.2 KB, 490 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2019, 06:22 AM
Peter P. Peter P. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Meriden CT
Posts: 7,237
I agree with tv_vt; I was tempted to buy a Ritchey Road Logic, but I didn't want a carbon fork. The problem is, there's no replacement fork custom or otherwise which would match the transition from the integrated lower headset cup to the fork crown.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-15-2019, 07:58 AM
ERK55 ERK55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter B View Post
It's the top side of any 44mm HT that bothers me. I've yet to see a clean HT-to-stem transition with this spec.
Couldn’t agree with this more. While the 44mm headtube may have structural advantages, it is flawed IMO asthetically. It have an otherwise very nice ti road bike but all I see is that big cylinder staring at me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:05 AM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter B View Post
It's the top side of any 44mm HT that bothers me. I've yet to see a clean HT-to-stem transition with this spec.
I'm okay with a beer can headtube look on a mtb, but on a road bike, give me a tapered head tube. Like that Winter linked up-thread. There are choices for a tapered head tube for steel, not sure about Ti.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:10 AM
ERK55 ERK55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 987
I happen to be the owner of a road bike version of the above Winter you reference. The tapered head tube is indeed beautiful. The accompanying steel fork is very stiff, and heavy, however.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:22 AM
jmoore's Avatar
jmoore jmoore is offline
bourbon!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanile View Post
Columbus max forks with the samson crowns are good at that intent, but unfortunately built to a 1”. If there were a 1 1/8 version id be on that so quickly..
Oh my. Soooooo good. ooof
__________________
Cuero - Fine leather cycling gloves - GET SOME
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:23 AM
skiezo skiezo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 1,603
This one seems to flow nicely into the HT junction. The steer tube is 1 1/8".
https://forums.thepaceline.net/showt...hlight=sketchy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:24 AM
AngryScientist's Avatar
AngryScientist AngryScientist is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northeast NJ
Posts: 33,148
the fork on my Swan is 1-1/8 and i think it looks pretty fluid with the rest of the bike...


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-15-2019, 08:38 AM
bitpuddle bitpuddle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanile View Post
Columbus max forks with the samson crowns are good at that intent, but unfortunately built to a 1”. If there were a 1 1/8 version id be on that so quickly..
That is really nice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.