Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old 02-16-2018, 11:00 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachagua View Post
I guess so, thanks. What I hoped to throw some light on is that there is a component of frame flex that puts the rear axle closer to the BB (since there had been some divergence of opinion on that).
Yes, there is a component of frame flex that puts the rear axle closer to the BB. But of all the flex components, this is one of the smallest. Since strain energy is inversely proportional to stiffness, this flex component will be a very small part of the total strain energy in the frame. While the GCN video may not be an entirely realistic simulation of pedalling, it clearly shows that the majority of the strain energy in the frame is from the horizontal twisting of the BB, not from the (linear) compression of the rear triangle. Anyone who wants to claim otherwise, will need to come up with direct evidence to support their argument.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.