Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2021, 02:58 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,527
YAY! Another "what do I want?" thread! Gravel fork edition

Getting a new bike. Front fork will take up to a 38. Thinking about upgrading it to something that can at least match the rear 42, if not exceed it. Going to be running the Fulcrum RR5 disc wheels.
I know nada about forks. Carbon preferred. Suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2021, 03:39 PM
prototoast prototoast is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 5,879
Most forks rated for a 38 tire (e.g. enve GRD, Columbus gravel) have a ~380mm axle-to-crown measurement. Most forks rated for 40+ tires have a ~395 axle-to-crown measurement. To swap one of the former for one of the latter will significantly alter the fit and handling of your bike.

If you have a 44mm external cup lower headset, you could swap to an inset headset and use a Ritchey straight steerer fork. That still has the ~395 a-c, but you'll lose ~10mm from the headset so you'll be closer. Some people aren't fond of the aesthetics of straight steerers in large headtubes, so if you're one of them, you might not like that option.

Alternatively, your current fork might be conservatively rated at 38. I know of people who have fit true 40-42mm tires, and they're fine as long as it's not too muddy.
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2021, 04:19 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by prototoast View Post
Most forks rated for a 38 tire (e.g. enve GRD, Columbus gravel) have a ~380mm axle-to-crown measurement. Most forks rated for 40+ tires have a ~395 axle-to-crown measurement. To swap one of the former for one of the latter will significantly alter the fit and handling of your bike.

If you have a 44mm external cup lower headset, you could swap to an inset headset and use a Ritchey straight steerer fork. That still has the ~395 a-c, but you'll lose ~10mm from the headset so you'll be closer. Some people aren't fond of the aesthetics of straight steerers in large headtubes, so if you're one of them, you might not like that option.

Alternatively, your current fork might be conservatively rated at 38. I know of people who have fit true 40-42mm tires, and they're fine as long as it's not too muddy.
Thank you for all this & I should have said it is being built for me. It was suggested that I consider a fork that will handle this but while I'll get suggestions from the builder, I wanted to look at things and know more about them (which I now know more than I did). So changing the handling is not an issue, since the bike will be built with the fork in mind
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2021, 05:38 PM
slowpoke slowpoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,552
Personally, I lean towards forks with a fork crown mount for a dyno light or front rack. Unfortunately this is not common, but off the top of my head I know Whisky, Spork, and Fern x Allygn have this.

This may be have mounts than you need, but Bikepacking has a list of forks with bottlecage mounts: https://bikepacking.com/index/forks-...e-cage-mounts/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2021, 06:02 PM
.RJ .RJ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NoVa
Posts: 3,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
I know nada about forks. Carbon preferred. Suggestions?
Depends on what you want out of the bike. Location says NoVa, and a 38-40mm tire is plenty for the local stuff. If you want more clearance, there's lots of options - do you need mounts of fenders? That will drive some of the choices. Whisky and Ritchey make nice forks without mounts, with mounts there's options like the Rodeo Labs spork.

I think there's likely not much difference in any of the forks and most of us would fail the pepsi challenge if we tried a couple on the same bike.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2021, 06:23 PM
prototoast prototoast is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 5,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
Thank you for all this & I should have said it is being built for me. It was suggested that I consider a fork that will handle this but while I'll get suggestions from the builder, I wanted to look at things and know more about them (which I now know more than I did). So changing the handling is not an issue, since the bike will be built with the fork in mind
If you're having it built for you, I'd talk to the builder about which forks he/she might use. Enve, Columbus, Whisky, Rodeo Labs, Ritchey all make great forks that fit 42+ tires, but there are different considerations for each. Some only come in certain rakes, which may or may not work with your desired handling characteristics. Some have extra mounts for racks/fenders, some don't. Some have different headtube/headset requirements--again, without knowing more abut the build, it's hard to know which one would be better than the others.
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2021, 06:30 PM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,957
seems to me that all the good forks are 395 A-C, so I would just pick one of them.

I usually build my own forks, but when I designed my all road fork it just naturally fell out that it was 395 A-C
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-20-2021, 06:54 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by prototoast View Post
If you're having it built for you, I'd talk to the builder about which forks he/she might use. Enve, Columbus, Whisky, Rodeo Labs, Ritchey all make great forks that fit 42+ tires, but there are different considerations for each. Some only come in certain rakes, which may or may not work with your desired handling characteristics. Some have extra mounts for racks/fenders, some don't. Some have different headtube/headset requirements--again, without knowing more abut the build, it's hard to know which one would be better than the others.
This is, of course, what will happen. He suggested I think about options, and as I said, I never really thought about forks, so looking for suggestions on what to investigate. I know we'll run into supply line issues on Ritchey, at least. I've looked at Whiskey, Lauf, and Enve so far today. I know much more about forks than I did 5 hours ago.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2021, 07:43 PM
party time party time is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 38
rodeo labs spork does it all, looks backordered forever though

https://www.rodeo-labs.com/shop/fork...abs-spork-3-0/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2021, 08:35 PM
Hilltopperny's Avatar
Hilltopperny Hilltopperny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Lassellsville NY
Posts: 9,903
Salsa makes a nice fork that has lots of clearance. I fit a 1.95 mountain tire in the one on my old Warbird. I am currently running a Whisky fork on my Firefly and it looks like it would have plenty of clearance for a 42mm tire.

Lots of good options out there, but these two forks work well and should easily have the clearance needed.

Sent from my LGL722DL using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-20-2021, 09:45 PM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hilltopperny View Post
Salsa makes a nice fork that has lots of clearance.
Salsa makes a lot of forks, are you talking about the Waxwing deluxe?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-21-2021, 05:04 AM
Hilltopperny's Avatar
Hilltopperny Hilltopperny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Lassellsville NY
Posts: 9,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
Salsa makes a lot of forks, are you talking about the Waxwing deluxe?
Yes, I believe it was a waxwing deluxe.

Sent from my LGL722DL using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.