#46
|
|||
|
|||
that's why the two numbers -- frame setback and saddle height. unless someone is doing something really stupid with the saddle (all the way forward on a zero setback post, for instance), one would get an idea "within the acceptable range" of what saddle setback would be if one has frame setback and saddle height.
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
where you sit on it. as an example, if the "R" is 8cm but the "I" is 14cm, it will tell an enlightened viewer that your saddle is shoved rearward on -that- frame. since all the tubes are connected, it is likely that a poorly thought out frame setback distance with have adverse affects on resultant measurements elsewhere, be they cg, or front wheelbase (handling issues), etcetera. conversely, if the "R" is 5cm and the "I" is 17cm, it is likely that the saddle is shoved forward. same problem - different resultant issues. if someone states that their "R" measurement is "X" and it works for them and their lower body output is "fine", then the measurement is a good starting point when a new sheet of paper is used to draw the next bicycle. one could either incorporate or ignore the "I" measurement on the existing bicycle depeding on the feedback of the user and/or the experiences-in-the-field of the constructor. e-RICHIE©™® |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
WOW!
This thread is heading towards the Cycling Museum Hall of Fame. |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If my "I" is 17.5 and my "R" is 8cm, and the scoopy part of the saddle aligns with the seattube, am I e-RICHIE approved? Thanks for the tips on locks btw, I had lox/cream cheese on pumpernickel at Zabar's Cafe yesterday afternoon. Mmmm. - Christian |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
you're cool. from now on you are christian©™® your's truly - e-RICHIE©™® |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
e-RICHIE©™®
I measure R = 3.5 cm and I = 14 cm. What is the implication?
Thanks, Chief
__________________
Chief One does what one does best. "Life is like a bicycle. To Keep your balance you must keep moving." A. Einstein, Feb. 5, 1930 |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
i'm thinking 'bout a randy newman song...
banasasas! |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Bump for a seven year old epic discussion. Learned a lot and still can learn from this. So, is Round the same round from the salon???
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Yup, he builds only with round tubes.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Dave, were you just kidding? I'd have to go downstairs to check to be 100% sure, but I believe my Duende DT is not a cylinder.
Louis |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Mine was the last time I looked!
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Do we have an ophthalmologist in house for Louis?
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Golden gem all the old heavyweights are here in this post
Cheers
__________________
Life is perfect when you Ride your bike on back roads |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Before Dario went "Round", he experimented with many different shaped tubes. The earliest Duendes (as well as the Team Customs) had teardrop shaped tubes. These were the first frames to be marketed under the Pegoretti name. When he was building for Pinarello, he built the Radius, which actually had some square sections of tubing. Dario once told me that he went round because a round tube always had the best strength-to-weight ratio and that it was much easier to determine how a round tube will react under different conditions than a non-round tube.
Nelson Frazier Gita Sporting Goods, Ltd. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
This thread is one of the reasons I bought...and kept...my Duende.
|
|
|