#196
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Completely agree as well. I like the examples of a complete pass and worship for some, but disdain for others that didn’t place nice with the feds. Seems like a bad double standard. Really hard for me to watch Hincape, Hamilton, Landis...etc in these interviews. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Again, it comes back to owning the screw up in a real, genuine way, rather than constant CYA about it. I don't think anyone can watch Tyler's 60 minutes interview or read his book, as two examples, and not see real internal turmoil and conflict about what he's doing. |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
When Tyler and Floyd were busted, they followed Lance's example (deny, deny, deny) and were professionally and personally destroyed. Lance lasted longer because he had a bigger firewall and war chest. He was no less guilty. Floyd peddles pot, Tyler sells training plans to MAMILs. Lance is set for multiple lifetimes of complete luxury. Seems fair. Defending Omerta is not a noble undertaking. Nor is attacking those who had a hand in its dismantling (whatever their reasons may have been). The very dirty, systematic, and institutionalized nature of doping in the "HiTest" era needed to be exposed fully for what it was. Festina and Puerto only uncovered a small part of the story. It wasn't until Floyd and Tyler opened up that it really began to take shape. That led to a flood of riders talking. Yeah, some of them got deals for their testimony, but that's part of the game. Is cycling clean now? Not by a long shot. However, at least the doping is not as overt and institutionalized as it once was. But yeah, Tyler and Floyd are the bad guys here. There is a double standard, but Lance came away ahead of everyone else.
__________________
My egocentric bike blog |
#199
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...e18-story.html https://www.velonews.com/news/lemond...andis-hearing/ Tim |
#200
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I've got much bigger things to worry about than passing judgement on these guys. |
#201
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Cheers...Daryl Life is too important to be taken seriously |
#202
|
||||
|
||||
You really think Floyd did not know? He hired the guy and told him Greg's personal story. Somewhere there was another article where Floyd was at some dinner and threatening to make Lemond's tale public.
Tim |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
I'm presuming that Greg never pressed charges against Floyd or his manager for this specific event? So I guess we'll never know who was really behind it...but it is for certain lower than low...really sickening.
|
#204
|
|||
|
|||
I watched and enjoyed it.
Over the years, I've read many of the books and articles in real time, so much of this (almost all) was not new. I pretty much made up my mind on him a while back, not so much for doping but for being a complete a-hole to everyone in his way. The bookends of seeing him as a young, talented triathlete, being a jerk to others, and then seeing him now, a guy who still doesn't get it, just confirms my point of view. He still wanted to point out the injustice of it all, triggered by discussing his visit to Jan Ullrich. But he behaved differently than the other guys in the peloton. He made more money, and he abused more people, and he was constantly in attack mode, with nothing off limits. That's why he's treated differently. Not because he was caught but because he was a jerk, so many times and to so many people. ...one time, and people forgive; twice or three times, perhaps. But constantly, no. The funny part of watching this was my wife's reaction. She just gasped when he said that he'd let his son dope if it was pro football but not college--just not worth it apparently. At that point and others, my wife's jaw just dropped. I'm jaded, I guess by all of this. She was just appalled. …and she's right. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
...and then he throws his buddy under the bus at the same time. Somewhere along the line a moral line got snapped. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Or that line never was formed in the first place. Lance would make a fascinating panel discussion at a psychology symposium. Nature, nurture, or somewhere in between...
Greg |
|
|