Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2020, 11:17 PM
eddief eddief is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 11,849
Specialized / Roval ditches tubeless with its new Rapide and Alpinist CLX wheels

interesting change of direction:

https://cyclingtips.com/2020/06/rova...st-clx-wheels/

the second set mentioned in the article are nicely light weight. maybe they think they'll sell more wheels by going for grams over the alleged advantages of heavier tubeless ready wheels. i'd think most roadies would be quick to choose lighter over tubeless given that choice.
__________________
Crust Malocchio, Turbo Creo

Last edited by eddief; 06-04-2020 at 11:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2020, 11:21 PM
robt57 robt57 is offline
NJ/NashV/PDX
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 8,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddief View Post
That is interesting and posy/noteworthy. Should we stock up on latex tube again?
__________________
This foot tastes terrible!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2020, 01:29 PM
eBAUMANN's Avatar
eBAUMANN eBAUMANN is offline
Imshi Cycles
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Saxtons River, VT
Posts: 9,631
Truly bizarre.
__________________
For Sale --- Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2020, 01:37 PM
robt57 robt57 is offline
NJ/NashV/PDX
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 8,440
I guess they have to decide which is the lesser of the evils. To limit a buyer pool due to that sticker, or to loose a big part of said buyer pool if pros/races are not bill boarding the gear.
__________________
This foot tastes terrible!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2020, 01:43 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,518
Why would you do this? How big a difference did it make to the wheel to be TLready?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2020, 02:01 PM
madsciencenow's Avatar
madsciencenow madsciencenow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N. Chicago area.
Posts: 4,259
Are these rims really almost 35 mm wide for a front rim? That seems extreme, even for disc?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Kirk JKS & MRB, Alliance G-road, & Top Fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2020, 02:01 PM
eBAUMANN's Avatar
eBAUMANN eBAUMANN is offline
Imshi Cycles
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Saxtons River, VT
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoti View Post
Why would you do this? How big a difference did it make to the wheel to be TLready?
They picked aerodynamics over tubeless...adding weight in pursuit of one thing and had to give up another to keep it competitive for the gram counters.

The only way the industry survives is by convincing people the thing they bought last year is no longer "cutting edge tech." with enough "i need all the help i can get at my age" rich folks out there, the strategy seems to be working, for now...

Quote:
Originally Posted by madsciencenow View Post
Are these rims really almost 35 mm wide for a front rim? That seems extreme, even for disc?
The only logical reason I can think for doing this would be to "fill" the fork, breaking wind (heh) more effectively around the downtube/frame.
__________________
For Sale --- Instagram

Last edited by eBAUMANN; 06-05-2020 at 02:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2020, 08:40 PM
jc031699 jc031699 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 967
The inner rim profile looks like they made this to be tubeless but somehow it wasn’t up to spec to be used for that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2020, 09:16 PM
GimmeSerotta GimmeSerotta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 108
Interested to see if this has any effect on the current traction road tubeless seems to have. I have no plans to go back to tubes after a year of loving tubeless.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2020, 10:25 PM
vincenz vincenz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 855
I applaud that the decision was made purely from a performance/weight perspective. No compromises. Good on spesh.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-07-2020, 10:29 PM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc031699 View Post
The inner rim profile looks like they made this to be tubeless but somehow it wasn’t up to spec to be used for that.
if you showed me a pic of that rim that didn't have the sticker, I would have thought it was tubeless. Really curious what is going on. Why have the bead troughs if it's not tubeless?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2020, 06:06 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by eBAUMANN View Post
They picked aerodynamics over tubeless...adding weight in pursuit of one thing and had to give up another to keep it competitive for the gram counters.

The only way the industry survives is by convincing people the thing they bought last year is no longer "cutting edge tech." with enough "i need all the help i can get at my age" rich folks out there, the strategy seems to be working, for now...

The only logical reason I can think for doing this would be to "fill" the fork, breaking wind (heh) more effectively around the downtube/frame.
ayup..before ya know it, there will be a novel way to secure the BB bearings into the frame....with threads..
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-08-2020, 02:29 PM
dddd dddd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
if you showed me a pic of that rim that didn't have the sticker, I would have thought it was tubeless. Really curious what is going on. Why have the bead troughs if it's not tubeless?
It would seem to me that if the tire went flat while at speed, that the better bead retention could better allow the rider to stay in control as he/she slowed for a tire repair or wheel/tire replacement.
Maybe even stay in the race until the rider gets where they need to go for a wheel? I know that I've ridden on a flat tire for some distance during a race.

It would be good to see tube-type rims evolve with what has been learned over the past few years with tubeless rims.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2020, 03:42 PM
makoti makoti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
ayup..before ya know it, there will be a novel way to secure the BB bearings into the frame....with threads..
Don't forget that bearings will be loose to allow freedom of movement and easier maintenance
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-08-2020, 06:12 PM
Waldo62 Waldo62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Oakland, now I may have a problem with that...
Posts: 1,082
Nice start. Next, they should ditch disks...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.