#31
|
||||
|
||||
My sense of it is that bicycles are very rarely “engineered” in the ways people might expect. Just like how jury’s are disappointed in the lack of forensic analysis in real court cases. Most of the design of bicycles is driven by tradition (fitting in with or reaction against) and aesthetics (fitting into the new style or pioneering a new one). I think most of the “engineering” comes when something goes wrong (won’t pass test, problems field testing, etc.) and is mostly done through simple iterative trial and error testing.
Nobody is starting a from a clean sheet using engineering principles to design the most perfect bicycle. Even more confusingly if someone did we probably wouldn’t like it. Even stranger is the fact that if we aren’t comfortable on a bike, for any reason, it will be a lower performance bicycle. This leaves the consumer and designer in the dark. They both want something new but not so new that it is “ugly” or confusing. We want comfortable changes that feel justified but don’t look or feel too different from our idea of what we want. The bowed top tube may or may not have some effect on frame performance, however, that isn’t why it was designed that way and that isn’t why you will buy it. As an example. People are still arguing about compact frames and that is a pretty simple thing to understand the benefits of. I have been designing my next bike for a while now and I am thinking of a bowed top tube for basic geometric reasons. I want a small headtube with 2 bottles on the down-tube and a lot seat post showing for free suspension. The bowed top tube will clear the top of the front bottle then curve down for a more compact seat tube. The twin six has a double bottle downtube, maybe they did it for the same reason.
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
All quantifiable explanations aside, from pre-war balloon tire bikes to Retrotec/Inglis and Blacksheep bikes, sometimes arced top-tubes just look great.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
I like it and ordered a Dean Ti frame with the curved TT.
__________________
Sonder MTB, Planet X Ti Gravel, Seven Ti, Lynskey Ti |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
100% agree
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Bleach
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
So true
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
I always liked how the arc the toptube of the Fast Boy TF5 continued down the seat stays:
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
#42
|
|||
|
|||
A rare sighting of the double humped top tube! Your bike is pretty cool.
I know I'm overthinking this x10, but it is kinda fun on a rare rainy day here. And, I've got the willing help of friendly enablers here. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Now that you've pointed that out, I really want the arc of the Twin Six to continue down the seat stays! Damn you man!
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't like the curves, then don't check out this thread...
https://forums.thepaceline.net/showthread.php?t=123274 W. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
|