|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I look forward to other innovative world firsts like:
first spoked wheel first pickleball paddle first alcoholic seltzer first avocado toast |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You can't have avocado toast and this fork, unless you're a boomer.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"It's the avocado toast of gravel forks"
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Or perhaps the pineapple pizza?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Oh good, another amateur philosopher watched Idiocracy for the first time
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
50% of my point. What do you weigh?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Give it a rest or take it to Reddit
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Question: Is this fork intended for aftermarket sales, or are gravel bike makers designing around (this or other) short travel suspension forks? Even a short travel suspension fork is substantially taller than a rigid fork, and retrofitting one in place of a rigid fork will result in a significant change in the geometry, and therefore the fit and handling, of a gravel bike.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Right now the industry loves slacker and more stability. End users seem to downplay the differences. The first time I rode a gravel fork on a frame designed without intent for it I was pretty blown away by the handling difference but the owner was nonchalant and said he hardly noticed anything. I mean look at how regular Joes struggle to talk about trail - changing that along with reach etc, while also adding suspension is a lot to internalize and structure mentally to discuss with someone else. For most riders it's probably going to be a good thing anyway. There does seem to be indications fork height is increasing. For "normal" rigid fork designs 395-400 atc is becoming less common with more forks 410+. Tire clearance and fork compatibility both benefits. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I have an Enve gravel fork on my LiteSpeed Watia gravel bike.
It's light, naturally damping, disk-ready and takes wide tires.
__________________
Colnagi Seven Moots Sampson HotTubes LtSpeed SpeshFat |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
They've shot themselves in the foot with the "no damper" sound byte. Their target market didn't know what that was but now they're confused about why it's missing because every MTB guy from the 90s says it sucks bc it doesn't have one.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
That is definitely a damper on the right side, and it sure looks complicated enough to force the price up over $1000.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
So, r u saying it has a damper or that forks actually don’t need dampers? I don’t understand
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
can someone please quote that picture again? I haven't seen it enough times.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Has air damper not oil damper, as noted earlier by mickey d. Once we get a service manual we’ll see what they decided to call it. I think this was a marketing mistake. Suspension forks don’t need an oil damper to function acceptably, Suntour has several air damper only forks that are indistinguishable from oil damper forks at the mid/low end. How well this works for the CC compared to other gravel forks is up for debate but if they said riders couldn’t tell the difference I find that compelling. I’d have a hard time believing they don’t already have the performance metrics for all the other gravel forks on the market to compare.
|
|
|