#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quill Stems
This is going to sound weird. I was putting together a kids bike with a quill stem, and I couldn't help but think: this is a WAY better design than the current clamp designs. I got into riding after quills disappeared from road bikes, but the elegance of the design was remarkable to me. No cutting, etc.
What am I missing here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Shhhhh, don’t let the secret out about this. Quill stems are nice…time for a show is your quill stem thread
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A quill with a removable front plate built for current 31.6mm bars is really nice if your bike has a threaded headset. No real downsides to me. Like you said, so easy to adjust bar height. Have done it mid-ride on multiple occasions. I have two Merckx frames with threaded headsets and both have custom stems made by Ti Cycles in Portland, OR, one ti and one steel.
OTOH, older quill stems for 26.0 bars and that need to have the bars 'threaded' through the opening, requiring brake and tape to be removed, are a total PITA to me. Last edited by tv_vt; 08-09-2022 at 12:16 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Where does this animal exist (at a reasonable cost, without going custom)?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Mostly that you can't thread carbon steerer tubes.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
https://wearefactoryfive.com/products/titan-stem |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Threadless is easier to manufacture (no threading needed) and keep inventory of (one length, cut as needed). Also, threadless is a better mechanical solution in terms of clamping forces, although in practice, a properly installed quill stem works just fine. (You have to make sure the wedge or cone is in the non-threaded portion of the steerer tube.) And threadless systems are lighter than threaded.
That said, 6 of my 7 bikes have threaded HS/quill stems. And the 7th has a 1" threadless! Yes, I'm that guy |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The Nitto technomic deluxe, at 195mm and 225mm lengths, really adds a huge range of bar heights for medium-ish and up sized frames.
Last edited by RWL2222; 08-09-2022 at 01:46 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I'm riding to promote awareness of my riding |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
….Then there is the world of custom quill stems….
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
If we are throwing out custom stems...the brodie ICR is amazing
And a video as to how he makes them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muraK-wJoSk Article on them https://www.thespoken.cc/time-to-rise-brodie-icr-stems Too bad he is out of tube stock and ill. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
That second one is nice!
Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A show stopper
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
With threadless steerers, you can make one size fork with one length steerer, and then cut it down to size. With threaded forks, only the top 50mm or so of the steerer can be threaded, so to match different size frames, the fork manufacturer has to make a variety of of different models of the fork, all with different length steerer tubes. After selecting the fork with a steerer tube of the closest length, you then have to cut down the fork the last few centimeters to match the frame. So you still end up having to cut the steerer. Why not thread the entire length of the steerer, so that a single fork can be sized to any frame? Because the steerer is weaker in the threaded area, and if you tightened down the stem's expander wedge in the threaded section, you risk cracking the steerer. This is part of the reason that stem quills have minimum insertion lengths - so you don't tighten the wedge in the threaded section. You only mentioned the issue of having to cut the fork, but there are many other disadvantages of threaded steerers/quill stems as well. I say good riddance. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Deda Murex is the one I use the most now days. |
|
|