Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-09-2017, 09:26 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
No, just use these, mount CR on middle position. Short chainring bolts, for single rings, used in track also. Done this bunches of times for shimano and Campag triples..
Unfortunately, a typical 110 BCD 46 tooth chainring will be intended to be mounted in the outer position (middle position is typically 38 teeth or less), so the bolt holes will be countersunk on the wrong side for mounting in the middle position. For a single crank, this would be fine - the chainring bolts would just be protruding a bit. But when using the small (74 BCD), the chain may rub against the chainring bolts - particularly with such a large chainring size difference, and what will may be a skewed chainline with a short BB.

Only a few companies make 110 BCD chainring larger than 40 teeth with the pins and countersinks on the correct sides to be mounted in the "middle" position. Sugino makes them for their OX series dual BCD mico-compact cranks, and IRD makes them for their similar Lobo dual BCD micro-compact crank.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11-09-2017, 10:48 AM
stien's Avatar
stien stien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 3,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geekonbike View Post
For those that are running the 48t big ring. How do you like it?

For me the 50t was a weird size. I ended up liking a 52t better. Not sure why but I seemed to be able to push 52x16 ~86" gear more comfortably that a 50x14 ~94" too tall and a 50x16 ~83" too short.
Sounds like you want a 15t cog.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-09-2017, 11:07 AM
RobJ RobJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NoVA
Posts: 3,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geekonbike View Post
For those that are running the 48t big ring. How do you like it?

For me the 50t was a weird size. I ended up liking a 52t better. Not sure why but I seemed to be able to push 52x16 ~86" gear more comfortably that a 50x14 ~94" too tall and a 50x16 ~83" too short.
I am running the 48T on a Praxis Zayante. Typically I used a 52/36 on my road bikes but thought I would try out the 48/32 for the winter and while I am getting back into shape. I really like the 48T and a lot of people seem to concur on the use of the 48T over the 50T. I find the combinations to be very good. And if you don't want the low 32t, they also have a set of 48/36 that they sell.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11-10-2017, 07:28 PM
fa63's Avatar
fa63 fa63 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Unfortunately, a typical 110 BCD 46 tooth chainring will be intended to be mounted in the outer position (middle position is typically 38 teeth or less), so the bolt holes will be countersunk on the wrong side for mounting in the middle position. For a single crank, this would be fine - the chainring bolts would just be protruding a bit. But when using the small (74 BCD), the chain may rub against the chainring bolts - particularly with such a large chainring size difference, and what will may be a skewed chainline with a short BB.

Only a few companies make 110 BCD chainring larger than 40 teeth with the pins and countersinks on the correct sides to be mounted in the "middle" position. Sugino makes them for their OX series dual BCD mico-compact cranks, and IRD makes them for their similar Lobo dual BCD micro-compact crank.
Thanks for this info. I inquired with Sugino about their chainrings, and they want $250 for the 46-30 combo... I also contacted IRD but haven't heard back yet.

I have been scouring the web for the past few days, and I think I have found an alternate combination that will work. TA Specialties makes a 46T middle chainring for 110 BCD. They are hard to get, but Peter White Cycles seems to have the silver version in stock. The silver color might clash with the black Dimension crank arms, but oh well. I also found some chainring tab shims that will cover the outer bolt hole to make things look a little tidier. I should have all the parts by middle of next week; I will post the results here.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11-11-2017, 02:57 AM
zzy's Avatar
zzy zzy is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Unfortunately, a typical 110 BCD 46 tooth chainring will be intended to be mounted in the outer position (middle position is typically 38 teeth or less), so the bolt holes will be countersunk on the wrong side for mounting in the middle position. For a single crank, this would be fine - the chainring bolts would just be protruding a bit. But when using the small (74 BCD), the chain may rub against the chainring bolts - particularly with such a large chainring size difference, and what will may be a skewed chainline with a short BB.

Only a few companies make 110 BCD chainring larger than 40 teeth with the pins and countersinks on the correct sides to be mounted in the "middle" position. Sugino makes them for their OX series dual BCD mico-compact cranks, and IRD makes them for their similar Lobo dual BCD micro-compact crank.
This is correct. You cannot just put a outer chainring in the middle position, even with single ring bolts. The bolts need to sit flush against the ring. I;ve tried it with a number of rings - no luck.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 11-11-2017, 06:33 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
Unfortunately, a typical 110 BCD 46 tooth chainring will be intended to be mounted in the outer position (middle position is typically 38 teeth or less), so the bolt holes will be countersunk on the wrong side for mounting in the middle position. For a single crank, this would be fine - the chainring bolts would just be protruding a bit. But when using the small (74 BCD), the chain may rub against the chainring bolts - particularly with such a large chainring size difference, and what will may be a skewed chainline with a short BB.

Only a few companies make 110 BCD chainring larger than 40 teeth with the pins and countersinks on the correct sides to be mounted in the "middle" position. Sugino makes them for their OX series dual BCD mico-compact cranks, and IRD makes them for their similar Lobo dual BCD micro-compact crank.
Get a 'simple' chainring w/o pins and ramps and mount it backwards..it'll work fine.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 11-11-2017, 07:47 AM
Clancy Clancy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulasaab View Post
I've pondered this question a few times over the last several years and the answer I come up with every time is White Industries. I've now bought three VBC setups (with WI BB).

I have been thoroughly pleased with the VBC crank in every way. I dis have one chainring that had defective shift-ramp pins. I contacted WI and had a new one in my hands a couple of days later, no questions asked. I even met the guy who took care of me a few months later at the Philly Bike Expo and he remembered me and we chatted. Nice people.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just installed a WI VBC crankset with a 30/46. Although the workmanship is brilliant, the shifting has been pretty poor, so much so that I'd like to toss 'em I'm so frustrated.

Shifting from small to big - if I have the cage adjusted correctly, the big chainring does not pick the chain up, slips and slips and slips. To get the chainring to pick up the chain I have to adjust the derailleur cage such that it's adjusted too far out and ends up throwing the chain off.

Adjusted correctly, won't shift or takes forever ( slipping and grinding)
Adjusted so it will shift, ends up throwing the chain off.

There's no machined shift ramps on the 46T outer chainring.

I've been pretty disappointed.

Suggestions?

Last edited by Clancy; 11-11-2017 at 01:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11-11-2017, 07:56 AM
bikinchris bikinchris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,327
I haven't read this whole thread, but what about SRAM XX?
__________________
Forgive me for posting dumb stuff.
Chris
Little Rock, AR
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11-11-2017, 08:38 AM
Andy340 Andy340 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 303
Initially had front derailleur issues with a 10 speed campy compact front mech: cage was issue so used a newer 2015 chorus front mech (cage shape is different) and aligned with one of these : https://www.universalcycles.com/shop...RoCg4YQAvD_BwE

Works a lot better now - not as good as with chorus crank but more than good enough for what I need
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-11-2017, 04:55 PM
Formulasaab's Avatar
Formulasaab Formulasaab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE USA
Posts: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clancy View Post
I just installed a WI VBC crankset with a 30/46. Although the workmanship is brilliant, the shifting has been pretty poor, so much so that I'd like to toss 'em I'm so frustrated.

Shifting from small to big - if I have the cage adjusted correctly, the big chainring does not pick the chain up, slips and slips and slips. To get the chainring to pick up the chain I have to adjust the derailleur cage such that it's adjusted too far out and ends up throwing the chain off.

Adjusted correctly, won't shift or takes forever ( slipping and grinding)
Adjusted so it will shift, ends up throwing the chain off.

There's no machined shift ramps on the 46T outer chainring.

I've been pretty disappointed.

Suggestions?


Which derailleur?

Best to use a derailleur designed specifically for compact or triple cranksets. I use Campy myself and it works a treat on a bigger jump than that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
-STEFAN
BUY FROM YOUR LBS or from Paceline members
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 11-11-2017, 06:13 PM
Clancy Clancy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulasaab View Post
Which derailleur?

Best to use a derailleur designed specifically for compact or triple cranksets. I use Campy myself and it works a treat on a bigger jump than that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Using SRAM Force, same set-up that I had with the SRAM Force crankset w/ 50/34.

I've readjusted the height of the derailleur of course, and proper cable tension, etc.

The shifting is no where as quick or clean.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.