Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2020, 10:00 AM
Veloo's Avatar
Veloo Veloo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,216
History/ logic to seat tube and seatpost diameters?

Just wondering if there is any (historical) reasoning behind the different seat tube and resulting seatpost diameters?

Of course 27.2 being the most common, but Chain Reaction has a range of posts from 26 to 34.9 diameters.

I've owned 27.2, 31.6 and even 26.8 posts myself.

Were those diameters some standard from another industry that just found its way over to bikes?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2020, 10:12 AM
C40_guy's Avatar
C40_guy C40_guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 5,966
Historical quirk.

The Royal Shim Industry lobby was very strong in the 1970s, and advocated for a krazy mix of seat tube diameters so that the shim industry would grow and prosper.

Even today, those of us riding carbon Colnagos continue to curse that lobby as we search, usually in vain, for 27.2 to 28.0 shims, or the unobtanium 28.0 seat post.
__________________
Colnagi
Seven
Sampson
Hot Tubes
LiteSpeed
SpeshFatboy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2020, 10:23 AM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,959
they came from tubing dimensions. Not sure how they came up with .6 wall 1 1/8" tubing, but that's 27.2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2020, 10:26 AM
colker colker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,000
26.4 was common. 27.2 is already oversize. Some bikes even had 25.0.
Tubing got thinner so in order to keep stiffness they widenned the diameters. I guess that´s how it went.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2020, 10:27 AM
colker colker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by C40_guy View Post
Historical quirk.

The Royal Shim Industry lobby was very strong in the 1970s, and advocated for a krazy mix of seat tube diameters so that the shim industry would grow and prosper.

Even today, those of us riding carbon Colnagos continue to curse that lobby as we search, usually in vain, for 27.2 to 28.0 shims, or the unobtanium 28.0 seat post.
How do you sell a seatpost labelled Colnago for 3x the cost of others? Make it 28.0
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2020, 11:23 AM
Mark McM Mark McM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,020
Like Unterhausen said, seatpost diameters can from commonly used tube diameters. In the days of lugged frames, tube diameters were limited to the availability of lugs.

Still, there were a small variety of different tube inside diameters, so there are a small variety of different seatpost diameters. Fortunately, there are more restrictions on steerer tube diameter, so there is smaller number of headset and stem sizes to worry about.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2020, 01:52 PM
Hindmost's Avatar
Hindmost Hindmost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 2,117
Eddy rode 27.2. So, there's really not a lot to say.
__________________
You always have a plan on the bus...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2020, 05:06 PM
Veloo's Avatar
Veloo Veloo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,216
I believe it was on the (old) Vitus frames that used the 25.0 seatposts.

So how does a builder decide on seat tube diameter?

My Schwinn S96.2 MTB is a 26.8 seatpost.

I know the Lynskeys used 31.6 at one time but mine is a 27.2.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.