Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:20 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,439
Age... Compact or triple?

Knees are getting older... The time has come.

Triple or compact? Change crank arm length? Just curious what everyone else has done with success. At present, I run 172.5 52/36 with 13/29 or 12/25 Campy 10.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:22 PM
jtakeda jtakeda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 707
Posts: 5,904
Personally I’d go compact but if you go triple for the lower gears I have a chorus 10 triple crank I’m ready to list
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:24 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtakeda View Post
Personally I’d go compact but if you go triple for the lower gears I have a chorus 10 triple crank I’m ready to list
PM me I am looking for a triple. Square taper?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:28 PM
ultraman6970 ultraman6970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22,852
I have an edco triple moving around with the edco triple sealed BB (italian)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:34 PM
Dave Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,898
Triples are no longer made by Campy and their shifters no longer support a triple FD. Consider that latest Chorus 12 with a 48/32 and 11-34 cassette. I switched both of my bikes recently and it works great. Having a low gear of 32/34 is lower than the triples I used in the past.

I've had a triple with a 28/29 low, but the new compact is just a bit lower.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:35 PM
buddybikes buddybikes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 4,026
What's your chainstay length? 410 would be bit too much angle, longer chainstay will help that issue.

Of course what riding type, kind of roads you ride etc all affect the decision
It's not just the crankset of course if going down that road. Compact double will probably slam on their without other investments.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:37 PM
redir's Avatar
redir redir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 6,837
Triples can be very fussy with shifting. I think they are a thing of the past now. With 11-speed, long cage RD, you can get just about all the gears that a triple can. And if you come to the worlds steepest climb then just walk
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:43 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,439
Just one of those old farts who rides mostly solo. Hills all around my house.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:50 PM
jtakeda jtakeda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 707
Posts: 5,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by redir View Post
Triples can be very fussy with shifting. I think they are a thing of the past now. With 11-speed, long cage RD, you can get just about all the gears that a triple can. And if you come to the worlds steepest climb then just walk
I never had any issues with setting up a triple. Everything worked perfect.

My only gripe was I had a 3rd bottle cage and the smallest ring would interfere with water bottles
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2019, 02:58 PM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,047
I've never had a problem shifting triples from Campy or Shimano. The only compact I had was 50-34 Ritchey cranks with 9 speed Veloce/Chorus/Record mix with 12-26 9 speed Campy cassette and it worked fine too. I also enjoyed a 48-38-28 TA Zephyr with 10 speed Chorus and 13-29 cogs. I still have the 24 tooth cog in the original package because I didn't need to go that low. Most of my bikes with triples had longish chainstays and they probably helped by reducing chain angles.

My last remaining road bike is my Riv. Rambouillet with 6503 Ultegra triple 52-42-30 and 12-27 cassette. I spend a lot of time spinning along in the 42 ring and the middle of the cassette saving the 52 for downhills and tailwinds and the 30 for steeper hills than I can manage in the 42.

With 50-34 and 11-26 9 speed I found some gaps and/or slightly awkward shift points but I wasn't racing so that didn't really matter. Maybe a compact with 11 or 12 cogs would eliminate those gaps but I haven't tried any of that new-fangled stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:06 PM
thwart's Avatar
thwart thwart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wisco
Posts: 10,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveandbarb1 View Post
What's your chainstay length? 410 would be bit too much angle, longer chainstay will help that issue.
400 mm chainstays. Couldn't fit anything larger than a 23 mm tire without rubbing the FD band. And yet that Record triple worked great.

The upturned stem, not so much.

With 10 spd Campy, I thought the front shifting was actually very good and surprisingly easy to master. We've all become accustomed to a 16 tooth chainring difference in the typical compact drivetrain... a 10 or even 13 tooth difference makes for better shifting performance.

__________________
Old... and in the way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:07 PM
zmudshark's Avatar
zmudshark zmudshark is offline
Small ring
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ in Winter A2 in Summer
Posts: 5,823
Old guy here. If you are sticking with 10s, go triple, if 11-12, compact.

I do not like the double shifting on a compact that I seem to have to do.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:12 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,439
My last experience with a compact was a long time ago - I think it was Campy 9 speed with a FSA compact. It sucked.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:13 PM
Dekonick's Avatar
Dekonick Dekonick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Howierd County, Maryland
Posts: 6,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by thwart View Post
400 mm chainstays. Couldn't fit anything larger than a 23 mm tire without rubbing the FD band. And yet that Record triple worked great.

The upturned stem, not so much.

With 10 spd Campy, I thought the front shifting was actually very good and surprisingly easy to master. We've all become accustomed to a 16 tooth chainring difference in the typical compact drivetrain... a 10 or even 13 tooth difference makes for better shifting performance.

Sharp looking bike.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-16-2019, 03:14 PM
donevwil's Avatar
donevwil donevwil is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Petaluma, CA
Posts: 4,986
I put a triple on my wife's bike (Campy 10). It has the same range as her previous 2x did, but with much smaller jumps (obviously). She is now more likely to have the right gear which has enabled her to more consistently hold a pace.

I love triples, unfortunately my bum knee can't tolerate the increased Q factor.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.